First COVID-19 Vaccines Receiving the US FDA and EMA Emergency Use Authorization.

Andra Fortner, David Schumacher
{"title":"First COVID-19 Vaccines Receiving the US FDA and EMA Emergency Use Authorization.","authors":"Andra Fortner,&nbsp;David Schumacher","doi":"10.15190/d.2021.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On December 31, 2019, the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission reported an increase in the incidence of pneumonia from an unknown cause. Shortly after, SARS-CoV-19 was identified as the responsible coronavirus for the heavy progress of the disease, which can manifest itself distinctively in different individuals. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggered a pandemic because of its high contagiousness before COVID-19 associated symptoms actually appear. In response to the rapid and continuous spread of the virus around the globe governments have mobilized their forces to restrict contact and thus avoid further infection and invested significant resources in treatment and prevention strategies to tackle COVID-19. As a result, US FDA and EMA have granted emergency use authorization for two mRNA-based vaccines, namely the vaccines developed by BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna, for use in the USA and Europe. Due to the existing critical situation, the stages of vaccine development and testing have probably never been gone through so fast as at present. Here, we are briefly commenting on these two vaccines with their benefits, advantages and limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72829,"journal":{"name":"Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8101362/pdf/","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15190/d.2021.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

On December 31, 2019, the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission reported an increase in the incidence of pneumonia from an unknown cause. Shortly after, SARS-CoV-19 was identified as the responsible coronavirus for the heavy progress of the disease, which can manifest itself distinctively in different individuals. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggered a pandemic because of its high contagiousness before COVID-19 associated symptoms actually appear. In response to the rapid and continuous spread of the virus around the globe governments have mobilized their forces to restrict contact and thus avoid further infection and invested significant resources in treatment and prevention strategies to tackle COVID-19. As a result, US FDA and EMA have granted emergency use authorization for two mRNA-based vaccines, namely the vaccines developed by BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna, for use in the USA and Europe. Due to the existing critical situation, the stages of vaccine development and testing have probably never been gone through so fast as at present. Here, we are briefly commenting on these two vaccines with their benefits, advantages and limitations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首批获得美国FDA和EMA紧急使用授权的COVID-19疫苗
2019年12月31日,武汉市卫生健康委通报,不明原因肺炎病例有所增加。不久之后,SARS-CoV-19被确定为导致该疾病严重进展的冠状病毒,这种病毒在不同的个体中表现出不同的特征。2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在出现相关症状之前就因其高传染性引发了大流行。为应对该病毒在全球范围内的快速和持续传播,各国政府已动员其力量限制接触,从而避免进一步感染,并在治疗和预防战略上投入了大量资源,以应对COVID-19。因此,美国FDA和EMA已经批准了两种基于mrna的疫苗的紧急使用授权,即BioNTech/辉瑞和Moderna开发的疫苗,用于美国和欧洲。由于目前的严峻形势,疫苗开发和试验的阶段可能从未像目前这样迅速完成。在这里,我们简要地评论一下这两种疫苗的优点、优点和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Dementia on Patients with Hip Fracture. Discovery that cells have plasma membrane portals called porosomes that govern secretion. Impact of the reporting source on Platelet Inhibition and Treatment Outcomes (PLATO) trial deaths. High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein as a Prognostic Indicator of Cardiovascular Disease in Severe Non-Diabetic COVID-19 Patients. Cardiac Involvement in Monkeypox Outbreak.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1