Camila Ferreira Vorkapic, Heloisa Alves, Larissa Araujo, Claudio Joaquim Borba-Pinheiro, Renato Coelho, Eugenio Fonseca, Ana Oliveira, Estelio H M Dantas
{"title":"Does Physical Activity Improve Cognition and Academic Performance in Children? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Camila Ferreira Vorkapic, Heloisa Alves, Larissa Araujo, Claudio Joaquim Borba-Pinheiro, Renato Coelho, Eugenio Fonseca, Ana Oliveira, Estelio H M Dantas","doi":"10.1159/000514682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the last decades, different studies have investigated the effects of exercise or physical activity (PA) on cognitive functions and academic performance in children and adolescents. But given the inconsistencies regarding methodologies and the fact that many studies do not have controlled or randomized designs, a more recent review is needed in order to summarize the different outcomes and methodologies employed and correlate them from an applied perspective.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of the present review is to systematically review and analyze the effects of acute and chronic PA interventions exclusively from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on cognitive functions and academic performance of children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases for all RCTs published between January 2014 and July 2020. Authors searched these databases using controlled vocabularies, keywords, and Boolean logic, and data were later extracted from the studies. Effect sizes were calculated based on means and SDs at posttest using Hedge's g formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. They were assessed for eligibility and later included in the review. Although most of the articles did not show any robust effect size and had significant methodological differences, 80% of the studies analyzed showed positive results, indicating a significant impact of exercise or PA on cognition.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Due to the heterogeneity in the design of the interventions and the variables analyzed, most of the studies showed small or medium effect sizes. Studies with big effect size in all variables had in common the fact that they involved team game variations and coordination activities. The combination of physical exertion (high intensity) and cognitive engagement with social interactions seems to have the strongest effect on executive functions. This ecological and attractive model reflects children's typical PA and might represent an ideal model for exercise in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although grouping different studies based on PA type, control groups, and comparison treatments is a limitation and results should be interpreted with caution, this review suggests that PA interventions, in particular, team game variations and coordination activities, have positive effects on children's cognitive functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19239,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychobiology","volume":"80 6","pages":"454-482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000514682","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000514682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Introduction: In the last decades, different studies have investigated the effects of exercise or physical activity (PA) on cognitive functions and academic performance in children and adolescents. But given the inconsistencies regarding methodologies and the fact that many studies do not have controlled or randomized designs, a more recent review is needed in order to summarize the different outcomes and methodologies employed and correlate them from an applied perspective.
Objectives: The purpose of the present review is to systematically review and analyze the effects of acute and chronic PA interventions exclusively from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on cognitive functions and academic performance of children and adolescents.
Methods: A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases for all RCTs published between January 2014 and July 2020. Authors searched these databases using controlled vocabularies, keywords, and Boolean logic, and data were later extracted from the studies. Effect sizes were calculated based on means and SDs at posttest using Hedge's g formula.
Results: A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. They were assessed for eligibility and later included in the review. Although most of the articles did not show any robust effect size and had significant methodological differences, 80% of the studies analyzed showed positive results, indicating a significant impact of exercise or PA on cognition.
Discussion: Due to the heterogeneity in the design of the interventions and the variables analyzed, most of the studies showed small or medium effect sizes. Studies with big effect size in all variables had in common the fact that they involved team game variations and coordination activities. The combination of physical exertion (high intensity) and cognitive engagement with social interactions seems to have the strongest effect on executive functions. This ecological and attractive model reflects children's typical PA and might represent an ideal model for exercise in this population.
Conclusions: Although grouping different studies based on PA type, control groups, and comparison treatments is a limitation and results should be interpreted with caution, this review suggests that PA interventions, in particular, team game variations and coordination activities, have positive effects on children's cognitive functions.
在过去的几十年里,不同的研究调查了运动或体育活动(PA)对儿童和青少年认知功能和学习成绩的影响。但考虑到方法上的不一致性,以及许多研究没有对照或随机设计的事实,需要进行更近期的综述,以总结不同的结果和采用的方法,并从应用的角度将它们联系起来。目的:本综述的目的是系统地回顾和分析随机对照试验(rct)中急性和慢性PA干预对儿童和青少年认知功能和学习成绩的影响。方法:使用MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、EMBASE、Web of Science和PsycINFO数据库检索2014年1月至2020年7月间发表的所有rct。作者使用受控词汇表、关键字和布尔逻辑搜索这些数据库,然后从研究中提取数据。效应量根据后验均值和标准差计算,采用Hedge's g公式。结果:共有20项研究符合纳入标准。他们被评估为合格,随后被纳入审查。尽管大多数文章没有显示出任何强大的效应大小,并且在方法上存在显著差异,但80%的研究分析显示出积极的结果,表明运动或PA对认知有显著影响。讨论:由于干预设计和分析变量的异质性,大多数研究显示小或中等效应。所有变量效应量大的研究都有一个共同点,即它们都涉及团队游戏变化和协调活动。体力消耗(高强度)和认知参与与社会互动的结合似乎对执行功能有最强的影响。这种生态和有吸引力的模式反映了儿童典型的PA,可能代表了这一人群中锻炼的理想模式。结论:尽管基于PA类型、对照组和比较治疗的不同研究分组存在局限性,结果应谨慎解释,但本综述表明PA干预,特别是团队游戏变化和协调活动,对儿童认知功能有积极影响。
期刊介绍:
The biological approach to mental disorders continues to yield innovative findings of clinical importance, particularly if methodologies are combined. This journal collects high quality empirical studies from various experimental and clinical approaches in the fields of Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology. It features original, clinical and basic research in the fields of neurophysiology and functional imaging, neuropharmacology and neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology and neuroimmunology, genetics and their relationships with normal psychology and psychopathology. In addition, the reader will find studies on animal models of mental disorders and therapeutic interventions, and pharmacoelectroencephalographic studies. Regular reviews report new methodologic approaches, and selected case reports provide hints for future research. ''Neuropsychobiology'' is a complete record of strategies and methodologies employed to study the biological basis of mental functions including their interactions with psychological and social factors.