Effectiveness of a Novel Sleep Clinical Pathway in an Inpatient Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Cohort: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jason Hsu, Kirk Kee, Andrew Perkins, Alex Gorelik, Jeremy Goldin, Louisa Ng
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Novel Sleep Clinical Pathway in an Inpatient Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Cohort: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Jason Hsu,&nbsp;Kirk Kee,&nbsp;Andrew Perkins,&nbsp;Alex Gorelik,&nbsp;Jeremy Goldin,&nbsp;Louisa Ng","doi":"10.2340/20030711-1000029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sleep disturbance in hospital is common. This pilot randomized controlled trial assessed a sleep clinical pathway compared with standard care in improving sleep quality, engagement in therapy and length of stay in musculoskeletal inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 51) were randomized to standard care (\"control\", <i>n</i> =29) or sleep clinical pathway (\"intervention\", <i>n</i> = 22). Outcome measures included: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale (HRERS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Patient Satisfaction with Sleep Scale, and actigraphy. Assessment time-points were at admission and before discharge from rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between groups for any outcome measure. As a cohort (<i>n</i> = 51), there were significant improvements from admission to discharge in sleep quality (PSQI (-2.31; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -3.33 to -1.30; <i>p</i> <0.001)], fatigue (FSS (-8.75; 95% CI -13.15 to -4.34; <i>p</i> <0.001)], engagement with therapy (HRERS-Physiotherapists (+1.37; 95% CI 0.51-3.17; <i>p</i> =0.037), HRERS-Occupational Therapists (+1.84; 95% CI 0.089-2.65; <i>p</i> = 0.008)), and satisfaction with sleep (+0.824; 95% CI 0.35-1.30; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Actigraphy findings were equivocal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sleep clinical pathway did not improve sleep quality compared with standard care. Larger studies and studies with alternate methodology such as \"cluster randomization\" are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","volume":"3 ","pages":"1000029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/1d/JRMCC-3-1000029.PMC8008738.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/20030711-1000029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Sleep disturbance in hospital is common. This pilot randomized controlled trial assessed a sleep clinical pathway compared with standard care in improving sleep quality, engagement in therapy and length of stay in musculoskeletal inpatient rehabilitation.

Methods: Participants (n = 51) were randomized to standard care ("control", n =29) or sleep clinical pathway ("intervention", n = 22). Outcome measures included: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale (HRERS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Patient Satisfaction with Sleep Scale, and actigraphy. Assessment time-points were at admission and before discharge from rehabilitation.

Results: No significant differences were found between groups for any outcome measure. As a cohort (n = 51), there were significant improvements from admission to discharge in sleep quality (PSQI (-2.31; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -3.33 to -1.30; p <0.001)], fatigue (FSS (-8.75; 95% CI -13.15 to -4.34; p <0.001)], engagement with therapy (HRERS-Physiotherapists (+1.37; 95% CI 0.51-3.17; p =0.037), HRERS-Occupational Therapists (+1.84; 95% CI 0.089-2.65; p = 0.008)), and satisfaction with sleep (+0.824; 95% CI 0.35-1.30; p = 0.001). Actigraphy findings were equivocal.

Conclusion: The sleep clinical pathway did not improve sleep quality compared with standard care. Larger studies and studies with alternate methodology such as "cluster randomization" are needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的睡眠临床途径在住院患者肌肉骨骼康复队列中的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
目的:医院睡眠障碍较为常见。该试点随机对照试验评估了与标准护理相比,睡眠临床途径在改善睡眠质量、参与治疗和肌肉骨骼住院康复的住院时间方面的效果。方法:51名参与者随机分为标准治疗组(对照组,n =29)和睡眠临床途径组(干预组,n = 22)。结果测量包括:匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、霍普金斯康复参与评定量表(hrs)、疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)、患者睡眠满意度量表和活动记录仪。评估时间点为入院和康复出院前。结果:两组之间的任何结果测量均无显著差异。作为一个队列(n = 51),从入院到出院,睡眠质量有显著改善(PSQI (-2.31;95%置信区间(95% CI) -3.33 ~ -1.30;p p =0.037), hrs -职业治疗师(+1.84;95% ci 0.089-2.65;P = 0.008))、睡眠满意度(+0.824;95% ci 0.35-1.30;P = 0.001)。活动描记结果不明确。结论:与标准护理相比,睡眠临床路径没有改善睡眠质量。需要更大规模的研究和采用“聚类随机化”等替代方法的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHARACTERIZATION OF BASELINE SYMPTOMS AND FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS IN A LARGE COHORT OF OUTPATIENTS ATTENDING A LONG COVID REHABILITATION CLINIC IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. EFFECTIVENESS OF RADIAL EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN THE LOCAL MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTONIA (SPASTICITY AND DYSTONIA) IN PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL PALSY. INPATIENT REHABILITATION AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF A CASE OF ANTI-SRP IMMUNE-MEDIATED NECROTIZING MYOPATHY. EXPLORING THE FEASIBILITY OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA INJECTIONS FOR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCOPATHY: A PILOT STUDY. FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH POST COVID-19 CONDITION AFTER A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM ASSESSMENT: A PILOT STUDY.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1