Comparative performance of extreme learning machine and Hammerstein-Weiner models for modelling the intestinal hyper-motility and secretory inhibitory effects of methanolic leaf extract of Combretumhypopilinum Diels (Combretaceae).

In Silico Pharmacology Pub Date : 2021-04-12 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s40203-021-00090-1
Mubarak Hussaini Ahmad, A G Usman, S I Abba
{"title":"Comparative performance of extreme learning machine and Hammerstein-Weiner models for modelling the intestinal hyper-motility and secretory inhibitory effects of methanolic leaf extract of <i>Combretumhypopilinum</i> Diels (Combretaceae).","authors":"Mubarak Hussaini Ahmad,&nbsp;A G Usman,&nbsp;S I Abba","doi":"10.1007/s40203-021-00090-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, three data-driven approaches were explored, including two artificial intelligence (AI) based models namely; Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) and Hammerstein-Weiner (HW) models and a trivial linear model namely; multilinear regression (MLR). In this context, the models were developed using the onset of diarrhoea, the total number of wet faeces, total number of faeces, weight of intestinal content (g) and length of the small intestine (cm) as the independent variables. In contrast, distance travelled by charcoal meal (C) and volume of intestinal content (I) were considered as the dependent variables for the prediction of the intestinal hypermotility and secretory inhibitory effects of the methanol leaf extract of <i>Combretum hypopilinum</i> (MECH). Three different performance indicators including; mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and Root mean square error (RMSE) were employed in this research to calculate and determine the performance skills of the models. The obtained results indicated the reliable capability of ELM and HW over MLR model having NSE-values higher than 0.90 in both the calibration and verification stages. The results further demonstrated that, in terms of MAPE and RMSE, ELM and HW models showed higher performance efficiency than the MLR model. Even though HW outperformed the ELM and MLR models in the prediction of I. Whereas, ELM outperformed HW and MLR models in the prediction of C. Overall; the results proved the satisfactory ability of the AI-based models (HW and ELM) for modelling the Intestinal hypermotility and secretory inhibitory effects of MECH.</p>","PeriodicalId":13380,"journal":{"name":"In Silico Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40203-021-00090-1","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Silico Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40203-021-00090-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In this article, three data-driven approaches were explored, including two artificial intelligence (AI) based models namely; Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) and Hammerstein-Weiner (HW) models and a trivial linear model namely; multilinear regression (MLR). In this context, the models were developed using the onset of diarrhoea, the total number of wet faeces, total number of faeces, weight of intestinal content (g) and length of the small intestine (cm) as the independent variables. In contrast, distance travelled by charcoal meal (C) and volume of intestinal content (I) were considered as the dependent variables for the prediction of the intestinal hypermotility and secretory inhibitory effects of the methanol leaf extract of Combretum hypopilinum (MECH). Three different performance indicators including; mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and Root mean square error (RMSE) were employed in this research to calculate and determine the performance skills of the models. The obtained results indicated the reliable capability of ELM and HW over MLR model having NSE-values higher than 0.90 in both the calibration and verification stages. The results further demonstrated that, in terms of MAPE and RMSE, ELM and HW models showed higher performance efficiency than the MLR model. Even though HW outperformed the ELM and MLR models in the prediction of I. Whereas, ELM outperformed HW and MLR models in the prediction of C. Overall; the results proved the satisfactory ability of the AI-based models (HW and ELM) for modelling the Intestinal hypermotility and secretory inhibitory effects of MECH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极端学习机模型和Hammerstein-Weiner模型在模拟Combretumhypopilinum Diels (combretacae)甲醇叶提取物肠道超蠕动和分泌抑制作用方面的比较性能。
本文探讨了三种数据驱动的方法,包括两个基于人工智能(AI)的模型,即;极限学习机(ELM)和Hammerstein-Weiner (HW)模型以及平凡线性模型,即;多元线性回归。在这种情况下,以腹泻发病、湿粪便总数、粪便总数、肠道内容物重量(g)和小肠长度(cm)作为自变量建立模型。相比而言,炭粉移动距离(C)和肠道内容物体积(I)被认为是预测Combretum hypopilinum (MECH)甲醇叶提取物肠道高动和分泌抑制作用的因变量。三个不同的绩效指标包括;本研究采用平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)、Nash-Sutcliffe效率(NSE)和均方根误差(RMSE)来计算和确定模型的绩效技能。结果表明,在校正和验证阶段,ELM和HW对nse值大于0.90的MLR模型都具有可靠的能力。结果进一步表明,在MAPE和RMSE方面,ELM和HW模型比MLR模型表现出更高的性能效率。尽管HW在i的预测上优于ELM和MLR模型,但在c的预测上,ELM优于HW和MLR模型。结果表明,基于人工智能的模型(HW和ELM)对MECH的肠道运动亢进和分泌抑制作用的模拟能力令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting phase-I metabolism of piceatannol: an in silico study Exploring isoindolin-1-ones as potential CDK7 inhibitors using cheminformatic tools Investigation of alpha amylase inhibitors from Bidens pilosa L. by in silico and in vitro studies Network pharmacology reveals the potential of Dolastatin 16 as a diabetic wound healing agent. RND pump inhibition: in-silico and in-vitro study by Eugenol on clinical strain of E. coli and P. aeruginosa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1