Survey of Nursing Faculty Preparation for Guiding DNP Quality Improvement Projects.

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2021-05-20 DOI:10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00036
Debra Bingham, Margaret Hammersla, Anne Belcher, Lucy Rose Ruccio, Susan Bindon, Kathleen Buckley, Jeff Martin, Shannon Idzik
{"title":"Survey of Nursing Faculty Preparation for Guiding DNP Quality Improvement Projects.","authors":"Debra Bingham, Margaret Hammersla, Anne Belcher, Lucy Rose Ruccio, Susan Bindon, Kathleen Buckley, Jeff Martin, Shannon Idzik","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) projects comprise the majority of University of Maryland School of Nursing (UMSON) Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) projects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was completed by 51% (<i>n</i> = 38) of faculty, who teach or mentor DNP students, and was analyzed using quantitative and descriptive methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Faculty were somewhat or not familiar with developing a QI charter 68.4%, human error theory and error proofing 63.2%, driver diagrams 60.5%, characteristics of high-reliability organizations 60.5%, and Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines 55.3%. The faculty were most interested in learning more about (<i>n</i> = 97 responses) were human error theory and error proofing (28.9%), SQUIRE guidelines (26.3%), statistical process control (21.1%), and implementation strategies and tactics (21.1%). The most commonly identified challenges included identifying QI projects (24%), project time constraints (16%), keeping up-to-date on QI concepts, methods, and tools (12%), and balancing professional workload (10%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gaps in self-reported QI knowledge indicate there is a need for further development of DNP and PhD prepared faculty at the UMSON.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quality improvement (QI) projects comprise the majority of University of Maryland School of Nursing (UMSON) Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) projects.

Methods: An online survey was completed by 51% (n = 38) of faculty, who teach or mentor DNP students, and was analyzed using quantitative and descriptive methods.

Results: Faculty were somewhat or not familiar with developing a QI charter 68.4%, human error theory and error proofing 63.2%, driver diagrams 60.5%, characteristics of high-reliability organizations 60.5%, and Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines 55.3%. The faculty were most interested in learning more about (n = 97 responses) were human error theory and error proofing (28.9%), SQUIRE guidelines (26.3%), statistical process control (21.1%), and implementation strategies and tactics (21.1%). The most commonly identified challenges included identifying QI projects (24%), project time constraints (16%), keeping up-to-date on QI concepts, methods, and tools (12%), and balancing professional workload (10%).

Conclusions: Gaps in self-reported QI knowledge indicate there is a need for further development of DNP and PhD prepared faculty at the UMSON.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理学院指导 DNP 质量改进项目的准备情况调查。
背景:质量改进(QI)项目是马里兰大学护理学院(UMSON)护理实践博士(DNP)项目的主要内容:51%(n = 38)教授或指导 DNP 学生的教师完成了一项在线调查,调查采用定量和描述性方法进行分析:结果:教师们对制定质量改进章程68.4%、人为错误理论和防错63.2%、驱动图60.5%、高可靠性组织的特征60.5%和卓越质量改进报告标准(SQUIRE)指南55.3%的了解程度为 "有点了解 "或 "不了解"。教员们最想了解的内容(n = 97 个回答)是人为错误理论和防错(28.9%)、SQUIRE 准则(26.3%)、统计过程控制(21.1%)以及实施战略和战术(21.1%)。最常见的挑战包括确定 QI 项目(24%)、项目时间限制(16%)、及时更新 QI 概念、方法和工具(12%)以及平衡专业工作量(10%):结论:自我报告的质量创新知识差距表明,有必要进一步发展 UMSON 的 DNP 和博士预备教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of a Virtual Seminar Series for Doctor of Nursing Students to Promote Advanced Nursing Practice. Effect of Cold Vapor Application on Postoperative Sore Throat, Dry Throat, and Difficulty Swallowing: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Improving Person-Centered Depression Screening and Care in an Urban Faith-Based Community. Interactive Nursing Education to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding. Increasing Effective Primary Care Screenings in the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Health Community Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1