Doubling of Decipher Biopsy Genomic Score Is Related to Disease Reclassification on Subsequent Surveillance Biopsy but Not Adverse Features on Radical Prostatectomy.

Case Reports in Urology Pub Date : 2021-03-17 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/2687416
Kamyar Ghabili, Nathan Paulson, Jamil S Syed, Cayce B Nawaf, Ghazal Khajir, Darryl T Martin, John Onofrey, Michael S Leapman, Angelique Levi, Jeffrey C Weinreb, Peter A Humphrey, Preston C Sprenkle
{"title":"Doubling of Decipher Biopsy Genomic Score Is Related to Disease Reclassification on Subsequent Surveillance Biopsy but Not Adverse Features on Radical Prostatectomy.","authors":"Kamyar Ghabili,&nbsp;Nathan Paulson,&nbsp;Jamil S Syed,&nbsp;Cayce B Nawaf,&nbsp;Ghazal Khajir,&nbsp;Darryl T Martin,&nbsp;John Onofrey,&nbsp;Michael S Leapman,&nbsp;Angelique Levi,&nbsp;Jeffrey C Weinreb,&nbsp;Peter A Humphrey,&nbsp;Preston C Sprenkle","doi":"10.1155/2021/2687416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The utility of serial Decipher biopsy scores in a true active surveillance population is still unknown. In a man on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer, a doubling of the Decipher biopsy score within genomic low-risk category from first to the second biopsy related to biopsy reclassification to Gleason grade group 4 on the third biopsy. However, the final pathology at radical prostatectomy showed Gleason grade group 2 with an organ-confined disease. This case suggests that the genomic risk category of Decipher biopsy scores during active surveillance may be more informative than either the interval genomic score change or the biopsy Gleason grade group.</p>","PeriodicalId":30323,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2687416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The utility of serial Decipher biopsy scores in a true active surveillance population is still unknown. In a man on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer, a doubling of the Decipher biopsy score within genomic low-risk category from first to the second biopsy related to biopsy reclassification to Gleason grade group 4 on the third biopsy. However, the final pathology at radical prostatectomy showed Gleason grade group 2 with an organ-confined disease. This case suggests that the genomic risk category of Decipher biopsy scores during active surveillance may be more informative than either the interval genomic score change or the biopsy Gleason grade group.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
破译活检基因组评分加倍与随后监测活检的疾病重新分类有关,但与根治性前列腺切除术的不良特征无关。
在一个真正的主动监测人群中,连续破译活检评分的效用仍然未知。在积极监测低风险前列腺癌的男性中,从第一次到第二次活检中基因组低风险类别的破译活检评分翻倍与第三次活检将活检重新分类为Gleason分级4组有关。然而,根治性前列腺切除术的最终病理显示Gleason分级2组为器官局限性疾病。该病例表明,在主动监测期间,破译活检评分的基因组风险类别可能比间隔基因组评分变化或活检Gleason分级组更有信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Edema of the Scrotum and Penile Shaft: An Uncommon Initial Presentation of Acquired Angioedema With Low C1-Inhibitor. Acquired Hemophilia A Diagnosed Based on Gross Hematuria: A Case Report and Literature Review. Penetrating Posterior Urethral Injuries: Case Report and Management Strategies. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostatic Metastatic Recurrence from Testicular Cancer. Chondroma in the Urinary Bladder: An Extremely Rare Finding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1