{"title":"Treating Fetal Pain: Standard of Care for Some, But Not for All.","authors":"Robin Pierucci","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fetal pain is a hot topic of debate, but not amongst the neonatologists who daily treat premature babies. The uncontroversial medical standard of care for this population's treatment includes avoiding, minimizing, or intentionally treating pain, and this standard has evolved due to the data of multiple lines of research. While it is true that unsettled debate over how to best define \"pain\" continues, this debate does not change the fact that premature babies' outcomes are better when what seems to be painful stimuli is removed or treated. Thus there is an uncomfortable paradox between the current standard of care for neonatologists, and what remains legal for obstetricians to do to the same patient. While this article is not an all-inclusive literature review, it is a brief presentation of the information that informs current neonatal practice but does not equally inform national law.</p>","PeriodicalId":48665,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Law & Medicine","volume":"34 2","pages":"153-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Law & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fetal pain is a hot topic of debate, but not amongst the neonatologists who daily treat premature babies. The uncontroversial medical standard of care for this population's treatment includes avoiding, minimizing, or intentionally treating pain, and this standard has evolved due to the data of multiple lines of research. While it is true that unsettled debate over how to best define "pain" continues, this debate does not change the fact that premature babies' outcomes are better when what seems to be painful stimuli is removed or treated. Thus there is an uncomfortable paradox between the current standard of care for neonatologists, and what remains legal for obstetricians to do to the same patient. While this article is not an all-inclusive literature review, it is a brief presentation of the information that informs current neonatal practice but does not equally inform national law.
期刊介绍:
Issues in Law & Medicine is a peer reviewed professional journal published semiannually. Founded in 1985, ILM is co-sponsored by the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc. and the Watson Bowes Research Institute.
Issues is devoted to providing technical and informational assistance to attorneys, health care professionals, educators and administrators on legal, medical, and ethical issues arising from health care decisions. Its subscribers include law libraries, medical libraries, university libraries, court libraries, attorneys, physicians, university professors and other scholars, primarily in the U.S. and Canada, but also in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Italy, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.