The Evolution of Consanguineous Marriages in the Archdiocese of Granada, Spain (1900-1979).

4区 生物学 Q2 Medicine Human Biology Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.13110/humanbiology.90.2.02
Juan F Gamella, Ana María Núñez-Negrillo
{"title":"The Evolution of Consanguineous Marriages in the Archdiocese of Granada, Spain (1900-1979).","authors":"Juan F Gamella, Ana María Núñez-Negrillo","doi":"10.13110/humanbiology.90.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract In the 20th century Spain maintained some of the highest rates of consanguineous marriage in Europe. In many regions these rates were still high in the 1950s and 1960s but then decreased rapidly, and by the 1970s a generalized transformation in mating patterns was under way. In the following decades the marriage of persons closely related by birth became rare. Consanguinity and inbreeding have been much studied in Spain but almost exclusively in the central and northern regions of the country. This is the first study of a whole large diocese in the southern region of Andalusia. This article is based on the analysis of 15,440 records of consanguineous unions registered between 1900 and 1979 in the Archbishopric of Granada in Andalusia. In this period, the rate of consanguinity up to second cousins was 5.51%, and the mean coefficient of inbreeding, α, was 2.04 × 10–3. There is a high range of variability within the research area: the rate of consanguinity was more than three times higher in rural areas (6.74%; α = 2.44 × 10–3) than in the capital city (2.03%; α = 0.93 × 10–3). There was a high frequency of unions between first cousins and first cousins once removed. These amounted to 35.3% and 13% of all consanguineous marriages, respectively, and contributed to 70% of α-values. Consanguinity here has been strongly related to local endogamy. Thus, 76% of all consanguineous couples were born in the same locality, and 89% resided in the same locality at marriage. By the end of the 1960s premarital migration increased and local endogamy started to decrease. On the other hand, inbreeding is inversely related to spatial endogamy. The more inbred couples, such as uncles-nieces (C12) or first cousins (C22), show significantly higher exogamy rates than second cousins (C33) and third cousins (C44), and higher rates of premarital migration. Neither males nor females in intrafamily unions seem to be significantly younger than those in nonconsanguineous unions. Considering their temporal evolution, consanguinity rates increased in the first third of the century, reaching a maximum in the late 1920s, when over 7.4% of all marriages were consanguineous (8.3% for the rural areas), and the resulting α-value was the highest of the century (α = 2.71 × 10–3 for the whole diocese; α = 3.00 × 10–3 for the rural areas). Rates of inbreeding remained high until the 1950s and decreased thereafter in a period of accelerated emigration to cities, urbanization, industrialization, and social modernization. Overall, levels of inbreeding are similar and sometimes larger than those found in dioceses in the northwest of Spain, although marriages between uncle and niece were less common. Some of the counties in the diocese had very high consanguinity levels, not only the isolated area of La Alpujarra, previously studied, but also other ecological and historical microregions (comarcas). These results indicate that the widely accepted north-south divisions of the Iberian Peninsula in terms of consanguinity and inbreeding patterns require considerable reevaluation.","PeriodicalId":13053,"journal":{"name":"Human Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13110/humanbiology.90.2.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

abstract In the 20th century Spain maintained some of the highest rates of consanguineous marriage in Europe. In many regions these rates were still high in the 1950s and 1960s but then decreased rapidly, and by the 1970s a generalized transformation in mating patterns was under way. In the following decades the marriage of persons closely related by birth became rare. Consanguinity and inbreeding have been much studied in Spain but almost exclusively in the central and northern regions of the country. This is the first study of a whole large diocese in the southern region of Andalusia. This article is based on the analysis of 15,440 records of consanguineous unions registered between 1900 and 1979 in the Archbishopric of Granada in Andalusia. In this period, the rate of consanguinity up to second cousins was 5.51%, and the mean coefficient of inbreeding, α, was 2.04 × 10–3. There is a high range of variability within the research area: the rate of consanguinity was more than three times higher in rural areas (6.74%; α = 2.44 × 10–3) than in the capital city (2.03%; α = 0.93 × 10–3). There was a high frequency of unions between first cousins and first cousins once removed. These amounted to 35.3% and 13% of all consanguineous marriages, respectively, and contributed to 70% of α-values. Consanguinity here has been strongly related to local endogamy. Thus, 76% of all consanguineous couples were born in the same locality, and 89% resided in the same locality at marriage. By the end of the 1960s premarital migration increased and local endogamy started to decrease. On the other hand, inbreeding is inversely related to spatial endogamy. The more inbred couples, such as uncles-nieces (C12) or first cousins (C22), show significantly higher exogamy rates than second cousins (C33) and third cousins (C44), and higher rates of premarital migration. Neither males nor females in intrafamily unions seem to be significantly younger than those in nonconsanguineous unions. Considering their temporal evolution, consanguinity rates increased in the first third of the century, reaching a maximum in the late 1920s, when over 7.4% of all marriages were consanguineous (8.3% for the rural areas), and the resulting α-value was the highest of the century (α = 2.71 × 10–3 for the whole diocese; α = 3.00 × 10–3 for the rural areas). Rates of inbreeding remained high until the 1950s and decreased thereafter in a period of accelerated emigration to cities, urbanization, industrialization, and social modernization. Overall, levels of inbreeding are similar and sometimes larger than those found in dioceses in the northwest of Spain, although marriages between uncle and niece were less common. Some of the counties in the diocese had very high consanguinity levels, not only the isolated area of La Alpujarra, previously studied, but also other ecological and historical microregions (comarcas). These results indicate that the widely accepted north-south divisions of the Iberian Peninsula in terms of consanguinity and inbreeding patterns require considerable reevaluation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙格拉纳达大主教管区近亲婚姻的演变(1900-1979)。
在20世纪,西班牙保持着欧洲最高的近亲结婚率。在许多地区,这些比率在1950年代和1960年代仍然很高,但随后迅速下降,到1970年代,交配模式正在发生普遍转变。在接下来的几十年里,近亲结婚变得罕见了。亲属关系和近亲繁殖在西班牙有很多研究,但几乎只在该国的中部和北部地区。这是对安达卢西亚南部地区整个大教区的首次研究。本文基于对1900年至1979年间安达卢西亚格拉纳达大主教区登记的15440份近亲婚姻记录的分析。二表亲缘率为5.51%,近交平均系数α为2.04 × 10-3。研究区域内存在很大的变异性:农村地区的血亲率是农村地区的三倍多(6.74%;α = 2.44 × 10-3)比首都地区(2.03%;α = 0.93 × 10-3)。堂表亲和堂表亲之间的结合频率很高。这些分别占所有近亲婚姻的35.3%和13%,贡献了70%的α值。这里的血缘关系与当地的内婚制密切相关。因此,76%的近亲夫妇出生在同一个地方,89%的人在结婚时居住在同一个地方。到20世纪60年代末,婚前移民增加,当地的内婚制开始减少。另一方面,近亲繁殖与空间内婚制呈负相关。近亲交配较多的夫妇,如叔侄关系(C12)或堂表亲关系(C22),其异族通婚率明显高于堂表亲关系(C33)和堂表亲关系(C44),婚前移民率也较高。家庭内结合的男性和女性似乎都不明显比非近亲结合的年轻。考虑到它们的时间演变,近亲婚姻率在本世纪前三分之一时期上升,在20世纪20年代末达到最大值,当时超过7.4%的婚姻是近亲婚姻(农村地区为8.3%),由此产生的α-值是本世纪最高的(整个教区的α = 2.71 × 10-3;α = 3.00 × 10-3(农村地区)。近交率一直保持在高水平,直到20世纪50年代,此后在加速移民到城市、城市化、工业化和社会现代化的时期下降。总体而言,近亲交配的水平与西班牙西北部教区相似,有时甚至更大,尽管叔叔和侄女之间的婚姻不太常见。教区内的一些县有非常高的血缘水平,不仅是以前研究过的La Alpujarra孤立地区,还有其他生态和历史微区(comarcas)。这些结果表明,广泛接受的伊比利亚半岛在血缘和近亲繁殖模式方面的南北划分需要进行相当大的重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Biology
Human Biology 生物-生物学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Biology publishes original scientific articles, brief communications, letters to the editor, and review articles on the general topic of biological anthropology. Our main focus is understanding human biological variation and human evolution through a broad range of approaches. We encourage investigators to submit any study on human biological diversity presented from an evolutionary or adaptive perspective. Priority will be given to interdisciplinary studies that seek to better explain the interaction between cultural processes and biological processes in our evolution. Methodological papers are also encouraged. Any computational approach intended to summarize cultural variation is encouraged. Studies that are essentially descriptive or concern only a limited geographic area are acceptable only when they have a wider relevance to understanding human biological variation. Manuscripts may cover any of the following disciplines, once the anthropological focus is apparent: human population genetics, evolutionary and genetic demography, quantitative genetics, evolutionary biology, ancient DNA studies, biological diversity interpreted in terms of adaptation (biometry, physical anthropology), and interdisciplinary research linking biological and cultural diversity (inferred from linguistic variability, ethnological diversity, archaeological evidence, etc.).
期刊最新文献
A Review of Anthropological Adaptations of Humans Living in Extreme Conditions and Health Implications Dimensional Changes in the Skulls of Ancient Children with Age in Xinjiang, China More than Ethics: Changing Approaches to Research in Human Biology Mitochondrial DNA Variation in Southern Tunisian Populations The Origin and Dispersal of Austroasiatic Languages from the Perspectives of Linguistics, Archeology, and Genetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1