Nanoparticles Determination by Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry.

Wenhe Luo, Tao Li, Meng Wang, Wanqin Dai, Chunlei Jiao, Yuhui Ma, Yayun Ding, Fang Yang, Xiao He, Zhiyong Zhang
{"title":"Nanoparticles Determination by Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry.","authors":"Wenhe Luo,&nbsp;Tao Li,&nbsp;Meng Wang,&nbsp;Wanqin Dai,&nbsp;Chunlei Jiao,&nbsp;Yuhui Ma,&nbsp;Yayun Ding,&nbsp;Fang Yang,&nbsp;Xiao He,&nbsp;Zhiyong Zhang","doi":"10.1166/jnn.2021.19476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitatively studying the biodistribution and transformation of nanomaterials is of great importance for nanotoxicological evaluation. Recently, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry has been employed to distinguish nanoparticles (NPs) with their dissolved ions in biological samples. The principle of the proposal is based on a hypothesis that the intact NPs sampled by laser ablation will generate discrete sharp pulses of signals in ICP-MS measurement, being totally different from the continuous, relatively lower signals generated by ions. However, it is still a controversy whether NPs could maintain their intactness during the laser ablation. This work found a way to exactly determine the number of NPs sampled for each LA-ICP-MS measurement. It made possible to reveal the signal profile of a single NP in LA-ICP-MS analysis. The results suggest that AuNR, AgNP and TIO₂ NP were broken into much smaller secondary NPs during the laser ablation, therefore generating continuous signals in the analyzer. There was a certain probability that the fragmentation of large-sized NP or multiple NPs by laser ablation was not sufficient, leaving some NPs unbroken or some secondary NPs with relatively large sizes to generate discrete pulses of signals in the analyzer. When the intactness of NPs during laser ablation cannot be assured, it is impossible to determine the attribution of mass spectrum signals. These findings compromise the reliability of distinguishing NPs from their dissolved ions by LA-ICP-MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology","volume":"21 11","pages":"5436-5442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2021.19476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Quantitatively studying the biodistribution and transformation of nanomaterials is of great importance for nanotoxicological evaluation. Recently, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry has been employed to distinguish nanoparticles (NPs) with their dissolved ions in biological samples. The principle of the proposal is based on a hypothesis that the intact NPs sampled by laser ablation will generate discrete sharp pulses of signals in ICP-MS measurement, being totally different from the continuous, relatively lower signals generated by ions. However, it is still a controversy whether NPs could maintain their intactness during the laser ablation. This work found a way to exactly determine the number of NPs sampled for each LA-ICP-MS measurement. It made possible to reveal the signal profile of a single NP in LA-ICP-MS analysis. The results suggest that AuNR, AgNP and TIO₂ NP were broken into much smaller secondary NPs during the laser ablation, therefore generating continuous signals in the analyzer. There was a certain probability that the fragmentation of large-sized NP or multiple NPs by laser ablation was not sufficient, leaving some NPs unbroken or some secondary NPs with relatively large sizes to generate discrete pulses of signals in the analyzer. When the intactness of NPs during laser ablation cannot be assured, it is impossible to determine the attribution of mass spectrum signals. These findings compromise the reliability of distinguishing NPs from their dissolved ions by LA-ICP-MS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光烧蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定纳米颗粒。
定量研究纳米材料的生物分布和转化对纳米毒理学评价具有重要意义。近年来,激光烧蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱法被用于生物样品中纳米粒子及其溶解离子的鉴别。该提议的原理是基于一个假设,即激光烧蚀采样的完整NPs将在ICP-MS测量中产生离散的尖锐脉冲信号,与离子产生的连续的、相对较低的信号完全不同。然而,在激光烧蚀过程中,纳米粒子能否保持其完整性仍存在争议。这项工作找到了一种精确确定每次LA-ICP-MS测量取样的np数量的方法。这使得在LA-ICP-MS分析中揭示单个NP的信号谱成为可能。结果表明,在激光烧蚀过程中,AuNR、AgNP和TIO₂NP被分解成更小的二次NPs,从而在分析仪中产生连续的信号。存在一定的概率,即激光烧蚀对大尺寸NP或多个NP的碎片化不够充分,导致部分NP未被破坏或部分次级NP尺寸较大,在分析仪中产生离散脉冲信号。当不能保证激光烧蚀过程中纳米粒子的完整性时,就无法确定质谱信号的归属。这些发现损害了LA-ICP-MS区分NPs及其溶解离子的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology
Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology 工程技术-材料科学:综合
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: JNN is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal covering fundamental and applied research in all disciplines of science, engineering and medicine. JNN publishes all aspects of nanoscale science and technology dealing with materials synthesis, processing, nanofabrication, nanoprobes, spectroscopy, properties, biological systems, nanostructures, theory and computation, nanoelectronics, nano-optics, nano-mechanics, nanodevices, nanobiotechnology, nanomedicine, nanotoxicology.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Guihuang Formula in Treating Type III Prostatitis Patients with Dampness-Heat and Blood Stasis Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Unveiling degradation mechanism of PAHs by a Sphingobium strain from a microbial consortium. Modifier pathways in polyglutamine (PolyQ) diseases: from genetic screens to drug targets. Preparing and Applying Silver Nanoparticles in Conductive Ink and Inkjet Painting. Observation of Dominant Nuclei and Magic-Sized CdS Nanoparticles in a Single-Phase System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1