Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2021-05-04 eCollection Date: 2021-05-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671211007401
Yoichi Murata, Naomasa Fukase, Maitland Martin, Rui Soares, Lauren Pierpoint, Grant J Dornan, Soshi Uchida, Marc J Philippon
{"title":"Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yoichi Murata,&nbsp;Naomasa Fukase,&nbsp;Maitland Martin,&nbsp;Rui Soares,&nbsp;Lauren Pierpoint,&nbsp;Grant J Dornan,&nbsp;Soshi Uchida,&nbsp;Marc J Philippon","doi":"10.1177/23259671211007401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment for borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH) has historically been arthroscopic surgery or periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). As orthopaedic surgery is constantly evolving, a lack of comparison of outcomes for these 2 treatment methods could potentially be stalling the progression of treatment for patients with BDDH.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the existing literature on patient characteristics, procedures, clinical outcomes, and failure rates for patients with BDDH and to determine whether PAO or hip arthroscopic surgery is a better treatment method for patients with BDDH.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies included were found using the following search words: \"hip\" and \"borderline dysplasia,\" \"osteotomy\" or \"arthroscopy,\" and \"outcome\" or \"procedure.\" Articles were included if they detailed participants of all sexes and ages, reported on isolated hips, and had patients diagnosed with BDDH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A search was conducted across 3 databases, resulting in 469 articles for consideration, from which 12 total studies (10 on arthroscopic surgery and 2 on PAO) were chosen for a review. There were 6 studies that included patients with a lateral center-edge angle of 18° to 25°, while the remainder included patients with a lateral center-edge angle of 20° to 25°. All the studies reviewing arthroscopic surgery reported concomitant/accessory procedures, while the articles on the topic of PAO did not. It was determined that, whether treated using arthroscopic surgery or PAO, outcomes improved across all patient-reported outcome measures. Revision surgery was also common in both procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a lack of consensus in the literature on the best treatment option for patients with BDDH. Preoperative patient characteristics and concomitant injuries should be considered when evaluating which surgical procedure will result in the most favorable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"9 5","pages":"23259671211007401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/23259671211007401","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211007401","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: The treatment for borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH) has historically been arthroscopic surgery or periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). As orthopaedic surgery is constantly evolving, a lack of comparison of outcomes for these 2 treatment methods could potentially be stalling the progression of treatment for patients with BDDH.

Purpose: To evaluate the existing literature on patient characteristics, procedures, clinical outcomes, and failure rates for patients with BDDH and to determine whether PAO or hip arthroscopic surgery is a better treatment method for patients with BDDH.

Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: Studies included were found using the following search words: "hip" and "borderline dysplasia," "osteotomy" or "arthroscopy," and "outcome" or "procedure." Articles were included if they detailed participants of all sexes and ages, reported on isolated hips, and had patients diagnosed with BDDH.

Results: A search was conducted across 3 databases, resulting in 469 articles for consideration, from which 12 total studies (10 on arthroscopic surgery and 2 on PAO) were chosen for a review. There were 6 studies that included patients with a lateral center-edge angle of 18° to 25°, while the remainder included patients with a lateral center-edge angle of 20° to 25°. All the studies reviewing arthroscopic surgery reported concomitant/accessory procedures, while the articles on the topic of PAO did not. It was determined that, whether treated using arthroscopic surgery or PAO, outcomes improved across all patient-reported outcome measures. Revision surgery was also common in both procedures.

Conclusion: There is a lack of consensus in the literature on the best treatment option for patients with BDDH. Preoperative patient characteristics and concomitant injuries should be considered when evaluating which surgical procedure will result in the most favorable outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋关节镜手术与髋臼周围截骨术治疗髋关节边缘发育不良患者的比较:一项系统综述。
背景:治疗边缘性发育不良的髋关节(BDDH)历来是关节镜手术或髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)。随着骨科手术的不断发展,缺乏对这两种治疗方法结果的比较可能会阻碍BDDH患者治疗的进展。目的:评估现有文献中关于BDDH患者的特征、治疗方法、临床结局和失败率,并确定PAO或髋关节镜手术是BDDH患者更好的治疗方法。研究设计:系统评价;证据等级,4级。方法:纳入的研究使用以下搜索词:“髋关节”和“边缘性发育不良”,“截骨术”或“关节镜检查”,以及“结果”或“手术”。如果文章详细描述了所有性别和年龄的参与者,报告了孤立的髋关节,并有诊断为BDDH的患者,则纳入文章。结果:对3个数据库进行了检索,共纳入469篇文章,从中选择了12篇研究(10篇关于关节镜手术,2篇关于PAO)作为综述。有6项研究纳入了外侧中心棱角为18°至25°的患者,其余研究纳入了外侧中心棱角为20°至25°的患者。所有回顾关节镜手术的研究都报道了伴随/辅助手术,而关于PAO主题的文章没有报道。结果表明,无论采用关节镜手术还是PAO治疗,所有患者报告的结果指标均有改善。翻修手术在这两种手术中也很常见。结论:文献对BDDH患者的最佳治疗方案缺乏共识。在评估哪种手术方式能获得最佳结果时,应考虑患者的术前特征和伴随损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Midterm Functional Outcomes after Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization for Acute Versus Chronic Type 5 Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries. Radiographic Predictors of Excessive Lower Limb Torsion in Patients With Recurrent Patellar Dislocation. Unperceived First-Time Anterior Shoulder Subluxation: The Role of MRI in Detection and Characterization of Pathoanatomy. Reliability of Existing Measures and Classification Systems For Trochlear Dysplasia. Postoperative Effects of Depression and Anxiety in Hip Arthroscopy at 2-Year Follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1