Is social function a good proxy measure of personality disorder?

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Personality and Mental Health Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-17 DOI:10.1002/pmh.1513
Peter Tyrer, Min Yang, Helen Tyrer, Mike Crawford
{"title":"Is social function a good proxy measure of personality disorder?","authors":"Peter Tyrer, Min Yang, Helen Tyrer, Mike Crawford","doi":"10.1002/pmh.1513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personality assessment may be helped by proxy measures.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the assessment of social functioning in relationship to personality disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Secondary analysis of data from three clinical studies, following deliberate self-harm (n = 460), cognitive behaviour therapy for health anxiety (n = 444) and a 30-year follow-up of 200 anxious/depressed patients. Social function and personality were assessed using the Social Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ) and the Personality Assessment Schedule, with its ICD-11 modification. A 5-item short version of the SFQ, the Short Social Functioning Questionnaire (SSFQ), was also developed. The SFQ score in the first two studies (area under curve [AUC] 0.64 and 0.65) partly predicted personality status; in the third study, this achieved close agreement (AUC SFQ 0.85 [95% CI 0.8-0.9]; AUC SSFQ 0.84 [95% CI 0.78-0.89]). In all studies, social function deteriorated linearly with increasing personality pathology. Cut-off points of 4 on the SSFQ and 7 on the SFQ had high sensitivity (SSFQ 82%-90%; SFQ 82%-83%) and acceptable specificity (SSFQ 66%-75%; SFQ 69%-75%) in identifying personality disorder in the third study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social functioning recorded in either a 5-item or 8-item self-rating is a useful proxy measure of personality disturbance and may be the core of disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":46871,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Mental Health","volume":"15 4","pages":"261-272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Personality assessment may be helped by proxy measures.

Aims: To examine the assessment of social functioning in relationship to personality disorder.

Method: Secondary analysis of data from three clinical studies, following deliberate self-harm (n = 460), cognitive behaviour therapy for health anxiety (n = 444) and a 30-year follow-up of 200 anxious/depressed patients. Social function and personality were assessed using the Social Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ) and the Personality Assessment Schedule, with its ICD-11 modification. A 5-item short version of the SFQ, the Short Social Functioning Questionnaire (SSFQ), was also developed. The SFQ score in the first two studies (area under curve [AUC] 0.64 and 0.65) partly predicted personality status; in the third study, this achieved close agreement (AUC SFQ 0.85 [95% CI 0.8-0.9]; AUC SSFQ 0.84 [95% CI 0.78-0.89]). In all studies, social function deteriorated linearly with increasing personality pathology. Cut-off points of 4 on the SSFQ and 7 on the SFQ had high sensitivity (SSFQ 82%-90%; SFQ 82%-83%) and acceptable specificity (SSFQ 66%-75%; SFQ 69%-75%) in identifying personality disorder in the third study.

Conclusions: Social functioning recorded in either a 5-item or 8-item self-rating is a useful proxy measure of personality disturbance and may be the core of disorder.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会功能是人格障碍的良好替代测量指标吗?
背景:人格评估可借助替代测量:目的:研究社会功能评估与人格障碍的关系:对三项临床研究的数据进行二次分析,这三项临床研究分别针对故意自残(460人)、健康焦虑认知行为疗法(444人)以及200名焦虑/抑郁患者的30年随访。社会功能和人格采用社会功能问卷(SFQ)和人格评估表(ICD-11修订版)进行评估。此外,还开发了一个包含 5 个项目的简短版 SFQ,即社交功能简短问卷(SSFQ)。在前两项研究中,SFQ得分(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.64和0.65)部分预测了人格状况;在第三项研究中,SFQ得分与人格状况的预测结果接近(AUC SFQ 0.85 [95% CI 0.8-0.9];AUC SSFQ 0.84 [95% CI 0.78-0.89])。在所有研究中,随着人格病理程度的增加,社会功能呈线性下降。在第三项研究中,SSFQ的4分和SFQ的7分在识别人格障碍方面具有较高的灵敏度(SSFQ为82%-90%;SFQ为82%-83%)和可接受的特异性(SSFQ为66%-75%;SFQ为69%-75%):结论:以 5 项或 8 项自我评分记录的社会功能是人格障碍的有效替代测量指标,可能是人格障碍的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Personality and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Studies from Personality Dysfunction to Criminal Behaviour aims to lead and shape the international field in this rapidly expanding area, uniting three distinct literatures: DSM-IV/ICD-10 defined personality disorders, psychopathy and offending behaviour. Through its multi-disciplinary and service orientated approach, Personality and Mental Health provides a peer-reviewed, authoritative resource for researchers, practitioners and policy makers working in the areas of personality and mental health.
期刊最新文献
DSM-5 Functional Framework: Structure and Psychopathological Correlates of the DSM-5 Levels of Functioning Questionnaire-Short Form. Correspondence on "Validation of the Personality Disorder Severity for ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) Scale in a Danish Mixed Clinical and Prison Treatment Sample". The Role of Social Adversity in the Association Between Autistic Traits and Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms. Correction to "Advancing the Science and Reduction of Personality Disorders Stigma: Introduction to a Special Issue of Personality and Mental Health". Examining the Relationship Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and ICD-11 Personality Disorder in a Community Mental Health Sample.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1