Overview of drug induced liver injury in Brazil: What is the role of public health policy on the evidence?

Matheus William Becker, Karin Hepp Schwambach, Michele Lunardelli, Carine Raquel Blatt
{"title":"Overview of drug induced liver injury in Brazil: What is the role of public health policy on the evidence?","authors":"Matheus William Becker, Karin Hepp Schwambach, Michele Lunardelli, Carine Raquel Blatt","doi":"10.4292/wjgpt.v12.i3.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse drug reactions are responsible for increased costs and morbidity in the health system. Hepatotoxicity can be induced both by non-prescription drugs and by those used for chronic diseases. It is the main cause of safety-related drug marketing withdrawals and could be responsible for irreversible and fatal injuries.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify and to summarize Brazilian studies reporting the drug-induced liver injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of Brazilian studies was carried out until June 2020. It was found 32 studies, being 10 retrospective cohorts, 12 prospective cohorts, 5 cross-sectional, 3 case-control, one case series and one randomized clinical trial. In most studies were investigated tuberculosis patients followed by other infectious conditions like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus. The hepatotoxicity ranged from one to 57%, led by isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide. Few studies reported algorithm to assess causality. In most studies, there were moderate outcomes and it was necessary drug interruption. However, few severe outcomes, such as chronic liver damage and liver transplantation were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two different criteria for hepatotoxicity were found. The great heterogeneity did not allow a meta-analysis. Standardization of parameter of drug-induced liver injury and greater effort in pharmacovigilance could contribute to learn more about drug-induced liver injury (DILI)'s epidemiology in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The development of strategic public health policies seems to have an influence on the DILI scientific evidence in Brazil due to main studies are in HIV and tuberculosis line care, two strategic health policies in Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":23755,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"12 3","pages":"40-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/3f/WJGPT-12-40.PMC8134851.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v12.i3.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug reactions are responsible for increased costs and morbidity in the health system. Hepatotoxicity can be induced both by non-prescription drugs and by those used for chronic diseases. It is the main cause of safety-related drug marketing withdrawals and could be responsible for irreversible and fatal injuries.

Aim: To identify and to summarize Brazilian studies reporting the drug-induced liver injury.

Methods: A systematic review of Brazilian studies was carried out until June 2020. It was found 32 studies, being 10 retrospective cohorts, 12 prospective cohorts, 5 cross-sectional, 3 case-control, one case series and one randomized clinical trial. In most studies were investigated tuberculosis patients followed by other infectious conditions like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus. The hepatotoxicity ranged from one to 57%, led by isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide. Few studies reported algorithm to assess causality. In most studies, there were moderate outcomes and it was necessary drug interruption. However, few severe outcomes, such as chronic liver damage and liver transplantation were reported.

Results: Twenty-two different criteria for hepatotoxicity were found. The great heterogeneity did not allow a meta-analysis. Standardization of parameter of drug-induced liver injury and greater effort in pharmacovigilance could contribute to learn more about drug-induced liver injury (DILI)'s epidemiology in Brazil.

Conclusion: The development of strategic public health policies seems to have an influence on the DILI scientific evidence in Brazil due to main studies are in HIV and tuberculosis line care, two strategic health policies in Brazil.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西药物性肝损伤综述:公共卫生政策在证据上的作用是什么?
背景:药物不良反应是卫生系统成本和发病率增加的原因。肝毒性可由非处方药和用于慢性病的药物引起。它是安全相关药物退出市场的主要原因,可能导致不可逆转的致命伤害。目的:确定并总结巴西关于药物性肝损伤的研究。方法:对巴西的研究进行系统回顾,直到2020年6月。共发现32项研究,包括10个回顾性队列、12个前瞻性队列、5个横断面、3个病例对照、1个病例系列和1个随机临床试验。在大多数研究中,调查的是肺结核患者,然后是其他传染病,如人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和丙型肝炎病毒。肝毒性范围为1-57%,主要由异烟肼、利福平和吡嗪酰胺引起。很少有研究报道评估因果关系的算法。在大多数研究中,有中等的结果,这是必要的药物中断。然而,很少有严重的结果报告,如慢性肝损伤和肝移植。结果:发现了22种不同的肝毒性标准。巨大的异质性不允许进行荟萃分析。药物性肝损伤参数的标准化和药物警戒的加强有助于了解巴西药物性肝损害(DILI)的流行病学,巴西的两项战略卫生政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of an amino acid beverage formulation in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: A pragmatic real-world study Hepatitis C virus treatment with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir in patients co-prescribed carbamazepine: Three case reports. Update on the strategy for intravenous fluid treatment in acute pancreatitis. Cinnamic acid regulates the intestinal microbiome and short-chain fatty acids to treat slow transit constipation. "Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes": Commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1