Development of the Home Fall Hazard Checklist.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Research and Practice Pub Date : 2021-05-31 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/5362197
Christina Ziebart, Neha Dewan, Joshua Tuazon, Joy MacDermid
{"title":"Development of the Home Fall Hazard Checklist.","authors":"Christina Ziebart,&nbsp;Neha Dewan,&nbsp;Joshua Tuazon,&nbsp;Joy MacDermid","doi":"10.1155/2021/5362197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Home hazard assessment is particularly important following a fracture as a means of preventing subsequent fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current checklists and evidence on home hazard to develop a usable self-administered checklist that could be used by adults to assess home hazards.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Review and observational, prospective study. <i>Setting</i>. Community dwelling. <i>Participants</i>. Nine adults (4 men, 5 women) were asked to review the checklist and provide feedback on whether items were relevant, comprehensive, and easy to understand. <i>Intervention</i>. A search for literature examining the causes of falls that focused on home hazards or behaviours was conducted, and causes were extracted. Using the combined list of home hazards, a draft checklist was created. The participants were asked to pilot the checklist through their home. <i>Primary and Secondary Outcome</i>. An initial iteration of the checklist was modified to reduce redundancy (by grouping certain items together), improve usability (by adding a \"not applicable category\"), and improve readability (by removing double-barrelled questions or rewriting certain items).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This process resulted in 74 items in 10 areas. On average, it took 10 minutes for the participants to complete the home walk-through while filling out the checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fall hazard-home checklist is a new checklist designed to identify home fall hazards with the intended use of being either administered by self-report through memory or supported by a walk-about, and that could potentially be completed by a patient who has incurred a fall, fracture, a family member, or caregiver. Given the expense of home hazard assessments that involve a home visit, the validity of this method of detection warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45585,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","volume":"2021 ","pages":"5362197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8187056/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5362197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: Home hazard assessment is particularly important following a fracture as a means of preventing subsequent fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current checklists and evidence on home hazard to develop a usable self-administered checklist that could be used by adults to assess home hazards.

Design: Review and observational, prospective study. Setting. Community dwelling. Participants. Nine adults (4 men, 5 women) were asked to review the checklist and provide feedback on whether items were relevant, comprehensive, and easy to understand. Intervention. A search for literature examining the causes of falls that focused on home hazards or behaviours was conducted, and causes were extracted. Using the combined list of home hazards, a draft checklist was created. The participants were asked to pilot the checklist through their home. Primary and Secondary Outcome. An initial iteration of the checklist was modified to reduce redundancy (by grouping certain items together), improve usability (by adding a "not applicable category"), and improve readability (by removing double-barrelled questions or rewriting certain items).

Results: This process resulted in 74 items in 10 areas. On average, it took 10 minutes for the participants to complete the home walk-through while filling out the checklist.

Conclusion: The fall hazard-home checklist is a new checklist designed to identify home fall hazards with the intended use of being either administered by self-report through memory or supported by a walk-about, and that could potentially be completed by a patient who has incurred a fall, fracture, a family member, or caregiver. Given the expense of home hazard assessments that involve a home visit, the validity of this method of detection warrants further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定家庭跌倒危险清单。
目的:骨折后家庭危险评估作为预防后续骨折的手段尤为重要。本研究的目的是评估现有的家庭危害清单和证据,以制定一份可用的自我管理清单,供成年人用于评估家庭危害。设计:回顾性、观察性、前瞻性研究。设置。社区居住。参与者。9名成年人(4名男性,5名女性)被要求回顾清单,并就项目是否相关、全面和易于理解提供反馈。干预。对研究跌倒原因的文献进行了搜索,重点是家庭危害或行为,并提取了原因。使用综合的家庭危险清单,创建了一个清单草案。参与者被要求在家中试用这份清单。主要和次要结局。对检查表的初始迭代进行了修改,以减少冗余(通过将某些项目分组在一起),提高可用性(通过添加“不适用的类别”),并提高可读性(通过删除双重问题或重写某些项目)。结果:该过程产生了10个领域的74个项目。平均而言,参与者在填写清单的同时完成家庭演练需要10分钟。结论:跌倒危险-家庭检查表是一种新的检查表,旨在识别家庭跌倒危险,其目的是通过记忆自我报告或步行支持进行管理,并且可能由发生跌倒,骨折的患者,家庭成员或护理人员完成。考虑到涉及家访的家庭危险评估的费用,这种检测方法的有效性值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation. The journal focuses on improving and restoring functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. In addition, articles looking at techniques to assess and study disabling conditions will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Physical Health and Socioeconomic Status in Ambulatory Adults With Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy. Comparing the Physiological Responses to the 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Treadmill Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test. Virtual Reality Technology for Physical and Cognitive Function Rehabilitation in People With Multiple Sclerosis. Categories of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale Activities in Chronic Neck Pain and Their Relationship to the Neck Disability Index. The NewGait Rehabilitative Device Corrects Gait Deviations in Individuals With Foot Drop.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1