The utility of upper limb loading device in determining optimal walking ability in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.

Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-18 DOI:10.1142/S1013702521500050
Makamas Kumprou, Pipatana Amatachaya, Thanat Sooknuan, Preeda Arayawichanon, Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij, Sugalya Amatachaya
{"title":"The utility of upper limb loading device in determining optimal walking ability in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.","authors":"Makamas Kumprou,&nbsp;Pipatana Amatachaya,&nbsp;Thanat Sooknuan,&nbsp;Preeda Arayawichanon,&nbsp;Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij,&nbsp;Sugalya Amatachaya","doi":"10.1142/S1013702521500050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Walking devices are frequently prescribed for many individuals, including those with spinal cord injury (SCI), to promote their independence. However, without proper screening and follow-up care, the individuals may continue using the same device when their conditions have progressed, that may possibly worsen their walking ability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study developed an upper limb loading device (ULLD), and assessed the possibility of using the tool to determine the optimal walking ability of ambulatory participants with SCI who used a walking device daily ( <math><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>49</mn></math> ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All participants were assessed for their optimal walking ability, i.e., the ability of walking with the least support device or no device as they could do safely and confidently. The participants were also assessed for their amount of weight-bearing on the upper limbs or upper limb loading while walking, amount of weight-bearing on the lower limbs or lower limb loading while stepping of the other leg, and walking performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicated that approximately one third of the participants (31%) could progress their walking ability from their current ability, whereby four participants could even walk without a walking device. The amount of upper limb loading while walking, lower limb loading ability, and walking performance were significantly different among the groups of optimal walking ability ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>05</mn></math> ). Furthermore, the amount of upper limb loading showed negative correlation to the amount of lower limb loading and walking performance ( <math><mi>ρ</mi> <mo>=-</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>351</mn></math> to <math><mo>-</mo></math> 0.493, <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>05</mn></math> ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest the potential benefit of using the upper limb loading device and the amount of upper limb loading for walking device prescription, and monitoring the change of walking ability among ambulatory individuals with SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/33/hkpj-41-055.PMC8158402.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702521500050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Walking devices are frequently prescribed for many individuals, including those with spinal cord injury (SCI), to promote their independence. However, without proper screening and follow-up care, the individuals may continue using the same device when their conditions have progressed, that may possibly worsen their walking ability.

Objective: This study developed an upper limb loading device (ULLD), and assessed the possibility of using the tool to determine the optimal walking ability of ambulatory participants with SCI who used a walking device daily ( n = 49 ).

Methods: All participants were assessed for their optimal walking ability, i.e., the ability of walking with the least support device or no device as they could do safely and confidently. The participants were also assessed for their amount of weight-bearing on the upper limbs or upper limb loading while walking, amount of weight-bearing on the lower limbs or lower limb loading while stepping of the other leg, and walking performance.

Results: The findings indicated that approximately one third of the participants (31%) could progress their walking ability from their current ability, whereby four participants could even walk without a walking device. The amount of upper limb loading while walking, lower limb loading ability, and walking performance were significantly different among the groups of optimal walking ability ( p < 0 . 05 ). Furthermore, the amount of upper limb loading showed negative correlation to the amount of lower limb loading and walking performance ( ρ =- 0 . 351 to - 0.493, p < 0 . 05 ).

Conclusion: The findings suggest the potential benefit of using the upper limb loading device and the amount of upper limb loading for walking device prescription, and monitoring the change of walking ability among ambulatory individuals with SCI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
上肢负荷装置在确定可走动脊髓损伤患者最佳行走能力中的应用。
背景:许多个体,包括脊髓损伤(SCI)患者,经常使用行走装置来促进他们的独立性。然而,如果没有适当的筛查和后续护理,患者可能会在病情恶化时继续使用相同的设备,这可能会使他们的行走能力恶化。目的:本研究开发了一种上肢负荷装置(ULLD),并评估了使用该工具来确定每天使用行走装置的SCI患者的最佳行走能力的可能性(n = 49)。方法:评估所有参与者的最佳行走能力,即在最少支持装置或没有设备的情况下,他们能够安全自信地行走的能力。研究人员还评估了参与者在行走时上肢或上肢负荷的负重量,踩另一条腿时下肢或下肢负荷的负重量,以及行走表现。结果:研究结果表明,大约三分之一的参与者(31%)可以提高他们的行走能力,其中四名参与者甚至可以在没有行走设备的情况下行走。行走时上肢负重量、下肢负重能力、行走表现在最佳行走能力组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。05)。此外,上肢负重量与下肢负重量和行走性能呈负相关(ρ =- 0)。351到- 0.493,p < 0。05)。结论:研究结果提示,使用上肢负重装置和上肢负重量进行行走装置处方和监测非卧床SCI患者行走能力的变化具有潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1