Face perception predicts affective theory of mind in autism spectrum disorder but not schizophrenia or typical development.

IF 4.6 1区 心理学 Q1 Medicine Journal of abnormal psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.1037/abn0000621
Melody R Altschuler, Dominic A Trevisan, Julie M Wolf, Adam J Naples, Jennifer H Foss-Feig, Vinod H Srihari, James C McPartland
{"title":"Face perception predicts affective theory of mind in autism spectrum disorder but not schizophrenia or typical development.","authors":"Melody R Altschuler,&nbsp;Dominic A Trevisan,&nbsp;Julie M Wolf,&nbsp;Adam J Naples,&nbsp;Jennifer H Foss-Feig,&nbsp;Vinod H Srihari,&nbsp;James C McPartland","doi":"10.1037/abn0000621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SCZ) have overlapping symptomatology related to difficulties with social cognition. Yet, few studies have directly compared social cognition in ASD, SCZ, and typical development (TD). The current study examined individual differences in face recognition and its relation to affective theory of mind (ToM) in each diagnostic group. Adults with ASD (n = 31), SCZ (n = 43), and TD (n = 47) between the ages of 18 and 48 years-old with full scale IQ above 80 participated in this study. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) measured affective ToM, and the Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT) measured face perception. Adults with ASD and SCZ did not differ in their affective ToM abilities, and both groups showed affective ToM difficulties compared with TD. However, better face recognition ability uniquely predicted better affective ToM ability in ASD. Results suggest that affective ToM difficulties may relate to face processing in ASD but not SCZ. By clarifying the complex nature of individual differences in affective ToM and face recognition difficulties in these disorders, the present study suggests there may be divergent mechanisms underlying pathways to social dysfunction in ASD compared with SCZ. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":14793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of abnormal psychology","volume":"130 4","pages":"413-422"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244155/pdf/nihms-1696957.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of abnormal psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000621","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SCZ) have overlapping symptomatology related to difficulties with social cognition. Yet, few studies have directly compared social cognition in ASD, SCZ, and typical development (TD). The current study examined individual differences in face recognition and its relation to affective theory of mind (ToM) in each diagnostic group. Adults with ASD (n = 31), SCZ (n = 43), and TD (n = 47) between the ages of 18 and 48 years-old with full scale IQ above 80 participated in this study. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) measured affective ToM, and the Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT) measured face perception. Adults with ASD and SCZ did not differ in their affective ToM abilities, and both groups showed affective ToM difficulties compared with TD. However, better face recognition ability uniquely predicted better affective ToM ability in ASD. Results suggest that affective ToM difficulties may relate to face processing in ASD but not SCZ. By clarifying the complex nature of individual differences in affective ToM and face recognition difficulties in these disorders, the present study suggests there may be divergent mechanisms underlying pathways to social dysfunction in ASD compared with SCZ. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面部感知预测自闭症谱系障碍的情感心理理论,但不能预测精神分裂症或典型发展。
孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)和精神分裂症谱系障碍(SCZ)具有与社会认知困难相关的重叠症状。然而,很少有研究直接比较ASD、SCZ和典型发展(TD)的社会认知。目前的研究考察了每个诊断组在人脸识别方面的个体差异及其与心理情感理论(ToM)的关系。18岁至48岁患有ASD(n=31)、SCZ(n=43)和TD(n=47)且全量表智商超过80的成年人参与了这项研究。阅读眼睛中的想法测试(RMET)测量情感ToM,本顿面部识别测试(BFRT)测量面部感知。患有ASD和SCZ的成年人的情感ToM能力没有差异,与TD相比,这两组人都表现出情感ToM困难。然而,更好的人脸识别能力唯一地预测了ASD更好的情感ToM能力。结果表明,情感性ToM困难可能与ASD的面部处理有关,但与SCZ无关。通过阐明这些障碍中情感ToM和面部识别困难的个体差异的复杂性,本研究表明,与SCZ相比,ASD可能存在不同的社会功能障碍潜在机制。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Abnormal Psychology® publishes articles on basic research and theory in the broad field of abnormal behavior, its determinants, and its correlates. The following general topics fall within its area of major focus: - psychopathology—its etiology, development, symptomatology, and course; - normal processes in abnormal individuals; - pathological or atypical features of the behavior of normal persons; - experimental studies, with human or animal subjects, relating to disordered emotional behavior or pathology; - sociocultural effects on pathological processes, including the influence of gender and ethnicity; and - tests of hypotheses from psychological theories that relate to abnormal behavior.
期刊最新文献
Integrated multiplexed assays of variant effect reveal cis-regulatory determinants of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene expression. The wolf. Supplemental Material for Self-Esteem and Psychosis in Daily Life: An Experience Sampling Study Supplemental Material for Multimethod Assessment of Pubertal Timing and Associations With Internalizing Psychopathology in Early Adolescent Girls Supplemental Material for The Impact of Punishment on Cognitive Control in a Clinical Population Characterized by Heightened Punishment Sensitivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1