Modernizing Marriage: Balancing the Benefits and Liabilities of Bridewealth in Rural South Africa.

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Qualitative Sociology Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-23 DOI:10.1007/s11133-020-09457-w
Christie Sennott, Sangeetha Madhavan, Youngeun Nam
{"title":"Modernizing Marriage: Balancing the Benefits and Liabilities of Bridewealth in Rural South Africa.","authors":"Christie Sennott, Sangeetha Madhavan, Youngeun Nam","doi":"10.1007/s11133-020-09457-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The payment of bridewealth or lobola is a longstanding cultural practice that has persisted in South Africa despite significant societal shifts over the past two decades. Lobola has always been a complex and contested practice that both reinforces gender inequalities and, at the same time, provides status to women and legitimacy to marriages. In this paper, we describe rural South African women's perceptions of lobola, their experiences related to marriage and lobola, and how they reconfigure lobola to fit within modern life course aspirations and trajectories. We draw on interviews with 43 women aged 18-55 to examine desires related to lobola and the meanings of lobola given current social, economic, and health (HIV) conditions in rural areas. Our findings indicate that lobola offers women a complex set of benefits and liabilities. Although women value the support, social status, and respectability lobola offers, they also lament how lobola curtails their freedom to pursue education and limits their autonomy from husbands as well as in-laws. Women also view lobola as offering a sense of security amidst the uncertainty of the local political economy and the HIV/AIDS epidemic. We conclude that the way women incorporate lobola into their desires and plans reflects tension between the expectations and aspirations of \"modern\" women in a post-apartheid context in which rights feature prominently but economic security is not guaranteed, and cultural scripts reinforce longstanding gender norms but also ensure social support.</p>","PeriodicalId":47710,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Sociology","volume":"44 1","pages":"55-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218781/pdf/nihms-1602359.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-020-09457-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The payment of bridewealth or lobola is a longstanding cultural practice that has persisted in South Africa despite significant societal shifts over the past two decades. Lobola has always been a complex and contested practice that both reinforces gender inequalities and, at the same time, provides status to women and legitimacy to marriages. In this paper, we describe rural South African women's perceptions of lobola, their experiences related to marriage and lobola, and how they reconfigure lobola to fit within modern life course aspirations and trajectories. We draw on interviews with 43 women aged 18-55 to examine desires related to lobola and the meanings of lobola given current social, economic, and health (HIV) conditions in rural areas. Our findings indicate that lobola offers women a complex set of benefits and liabilities. Although women value the support, social status, and respectability lobola offers, they also lament how lobola curtails their freedom to pursue education and limits their autonomy from husbands as well as in-laws. Women also view lobola as offering a sense of security amidst the uncertainty of the local political economy and the HIV/AIDS epidemic. We conclude that the way women incorporate lobola into their desires and plans reflects tension between the expectations and aspirations of "modern" women in a post-apartheid context in which rights feature prominently but economic security is not guaranteed, and cultural scripts reinforce longstanding gender norms but also ensure social support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婚姻现代化:南非农村地区新娘保健的利益与责任之间的平衡》(Balancing the Benefits and Liabilities of Bridewealth in Rural South Africa)。
尽管南非社会在过去二十年中发生了重大变化,但支付彩礼(lobola)这一由来已久的文化习俗却一直存在。彩礼一直是一种复杂而有争议的习俗,它既强化了性别不平等,同时也为妇女提供了地位和婚姻的合法性。在本文中,我们描述了南非农村妇女对lobola的看法、她们与婚姻和lobola相关的经历,以及她们如何重新配置lobola以适应现代生活的愿望和轨迹。我们通过对 43 名年龄在 18-55 岁之间的妇女进行访谈,考察了她们对lobola的渴望,以及在农村地区当前的社会、经济和健康(艾滋病毒)条件下lobola的意义。我们的研究结果表明,lobola 为妇女提供了一系列复杂的利益和责任。尽管妇女们非常看重lobola所提供的支持、社会地位和受人尊敬的程度,但她们也对lobola如何限制了她们接受教育的自由、限制了她们不受丈夫和姻亲约束的自主性表示遗憾。妇女们还认为,在当地政治经济不稳定和艾滋病毒/艾滋病流行的情况下,lobola 提供了一种安全感。我们得出的结论是,妇女将 lobola 纳入其愿望和计划的方式反映了在种族隔离后背景下 "现代 "妇女的期望和愿望之间的紧张关系,在这种背景下,妇女的权利受到重视,但经济安全却得不到保障,文化脚本强化了长期存在的性别规范,但也确保了社会支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Qualitative Sociology is dedicated to the qualitative interpretation and analysis of social life. The journal does not restrict theoretical or analytical orientation and welcomes manuscripts based on research methods such as interviewing, participant observation, ethnography, historical analysis, content analysis and others which do not rely primarily on numerical data.
期刊最新文献
The Assemblage and Dismantling of Access Barriers in Administrative Bureaucracies: Constructing the Problem of Diversity in the German Welfare State Collective Action, Democratization, and Violence: Dynamics of Anti-Kurdish Riots in Turkey Relational Brokerage: Interaction and Valuation in Two Markets Correction: “But Everything Else, I Learned Online”: School-Based and Internet-Based Sexual Learning Experiences of Heterosexual and LGBQ?+?Youth Interview Location as Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1