Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Thickness Is a Risk Factor for Graft Failure. A Case-Control Analysis.

Ryan Roach, Utkarsh Anil, David A Bloom, Hien Pham, Laith Jazrawi, Michael J Alaia, Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas
{"title":"Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Thickness Is a Risk Factor for Graft Failure. A Case-Control Analysis.","authors":"Ryan Roach,&nbsp;Utkarsh Anil,&nbsp;David A Bloom,&nbsp;Hien Pham,&nbsp;Laith Jazrawi,&nbsp;Michael J Alaia,&nbsp;Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Graft failure following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a devastating complication. Risk factors such as patient characteristics and tunnel positions are well described. The relationship between graft dimension and failure rates has been investigated mainly in soft tissue grafts. Less studied are the effects of patella tendon (PT) dimensions on the risk of graft failure following patella tendon autograft (PTA) reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the current study was to investigate if patellar tendon thickness measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predicts failure after ACLR using PTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an institutional review board approved, single-center, retrospective case-control study comparing patients' preoperative patellar tendon thickness between July 2005 and January 2017. Sixteen patients (mean age 21.2 ± 5.0 years) with PTA failure requiring revision surgery were identified and compared to 34 control patients who had undergone primary ACLR with PTA without failure with a minimum of 2-years follow-up. Patients with failure were matched at approximately 1:2 based on age, sex, height, weight, associated meniscus injury, and associated meniscal surgery. Patellar tendon dimensions were measured at the inferior pole of the patella (IPP), tibial tubercle insertion (TT), and longitudinal midpoint (MP) on preoperative axial and sagittal cut MRIs. Interclass correlation coefficeint (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were evaluated to determine inter-observer reliability. The two cohorts were compared using independent samples t-tests and analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All ACLR failures occurred after a non-contact, pivot type injury. There were no significant differences in age, sex, height, weight, meniscal injury, or meniscal surgery between the two groups. Mean time between primary ACLR and revision was 2.6 ± 2.6 years and mean follow-up time was 3.1 ± 1.0 years in the control group. Patellar tendon length and width were not significantly different between the two groups. The average thickness at both the inferior pole and longitudinal midpoint was significantly higher in the failure group compared to controls (IPP: 5.04 ± 1.1 mm versus 4.33 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.01; MP: 4.60 ± 0.7 mm versus 4.22 ± 0.5 mm, p = 0.03). Additionally, ICC was high across all measurements, with all values > 0.978. Similarly, all values demonstrated bias of less than ± 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patella tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failures had significantly thicker patellar tendons at the inferior pole and longitudinal midpoint of the patella tendon.</p>","PeriodicalId":72481,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Graft failure following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a devastating complication. Risk factors such as patient characteristics and tunnel positions are well described. The relationship between graft dimension and failure rates has been investigated mainly in soft tissue grafts. Less studied are the effects of patella tendon (PT) dimensions on the risk of graft failure following patella tendon autograft (PTA) reconstructions.

Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to investigate if patellar tendon thickness measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predicts failure after ACLR using PTA.

Methods: This was an institutional review board approved, single-center, retrospective case-control study comparing patients' preoperative patellar tendon thickness between July 2005 and January 2017. Sixteen patients (mean age 21.2 ± 5.0 years) with PTA failure requiring revision surgery were identified and compared to 34 control patients who had undergone primary ACLR with PTA without failure with a minimum of 2-years follow-up. Patients with failure were matched at approximately 1:2 based on age, sex, height, weight, associated meniscus injury, and associated meniscal surgery. Patellar tendon dimensions were measured at the inferior pole of the patella (IPP), tibial tubercle insertion (TT), and longitudinal midpoint (MP) on preoperative axial and sagittal cut MRIs. Interclass correlation coefficeint (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were evaluated to determine inter-observer reliability. The two cohorts were compared using independent samples t-tests and analysis of variance.

Results: All ACLR failures occurred after a non-contact, pivot type injury. There were no significant differences in age, sex, height, weight, meniscal injury, or meniscal surgery between the two groups. Mean time between primary ACLR and revision was 2.6 ± 2.6 years and mean follow-up time was 3.1 ± 1.0 years in the control group. Patellar tendon length and width were not significantly different between the two groups. The average thickness at both the inferior pole and longitudinal midpoint was significantly higher in the failure group compared to controls (IPP: 5.04 ± 1.1 mm versus 4.33 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.01; MP: 4.60 ± 0.7 mm versus 4.22 ± 0.5 mm, p = 0.03). Additionally, ICC was high across all measurements, with all values > 0.978. Similarly, all values demonstrated bias of less than ± 0.05.

Conclusion: Patella tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failures had significantly thicker patellar tendons at the inferior pole and longitudinal midpoint of the patella tendon.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨-髌腱-骨自体移植物厚度是移植物失败的危险因素。病例-对照分析。
背景:前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后移植物衰竭是一种毁灭性的并发症。危险因素,如病人的特点和隧道的位置被很好地描述。移植物尺寸与失败率的关系主要研究于软组织移植物。髌骨肌腱(PT)尺寸对自体髌骨肌腱(PTA)重建后移植物失败风险的影响研究较少。目的:本研究的目的是研究术前磁共振成像(MRI)测量的髌骨肌腱厚度是否能预测PTA ACLR术后的失败。方法:这是一项机构审查委员会批准的单中心回顾性病例对照研究,比较2005年7月至2017年1月患者术前髌骨肌腱厚度。确定了16例PTA失败需要翻修手术的患者(平均年龄21.2±5.0岁),并与34例接受原发性ACLR合并PTA无失败的对照患者进行了至少2年的随访。失败的患者根据年龄、性别、身高、体重、相关半月板损伤和相关半月板手术按大约1:2的比例进行匹配。在术前轴向和矢状切割mri上测量髌骨下极(IPP)、胫骨结节止点(TT)和纵向中点(MP)的髌骨肌腱尺寸。评估类间相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析以确定观察者间的信度。使用独立样本t检验和方差分析对两个队列进行比较。结果:所有ACLR失效均发生在非接触性枢轴型损伤后。两组患者在年龄、性别、身高、体重、半月板损伤或半月板手术方面均无显著差异。对照组首次ACLR至翻修的平均时间为2.6±2.6年,平均随访时间为3.1±1.0年。两组髌骨肌腱长度和宽度无明显差异。失败组下极和纵中点的平均厚度均显著高于对照组(IPP: 5.04±1.1 mm vs 4.33±0.7 mm, p = 0.01;MP: 4.60±0.7 mm vs 4.22±0.5 mm, p = 0.03)。此外,ICC在所有测量值中都很高,所有值都> 0.978。同样,所有值的偏倚均小于±0.05。结论:自体髌骨肌腱前交叉韧带重建失败的髌骨肌腱下极和髌腱纵中点明显增厚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Amputation or Reconstruction? Development and Validation of a Patient Decision Aid for Treatment of Severe Lower-Extremity Trauma. Factors Associated with Patient Satisfaction After Periacetabular Osteotomy. Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma as a Treatment for Patellar Tendinopathy A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Subsidence in Nonexpandable, Single-Plane Expandable, and Dual-Plane Expandable TLIFs A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study. Symptomatic Idiopathic Ulnar Nerve Instability in the Elbow Diagnostic Considerations and 1-Year Outcomes After Anterior Transposition of Ulnar Nerve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1