Safety of Antiretroviral Therapy in the Treatment of HIV/AIDS in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY AIDS reviews Pub Date : 2021-12-29 DOI:10.24875/AIDSRev.200001071
Renata Szpak, Natália F Lombardi, Frederico A Dias, Helena H L Borba, Roberto Pontarolo, Astrid Wiens
{"title":"Safety of Antiretroviral Therapy in the Treatment of HIV/AIDS in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Renata Szpak,&nbsp;Natália F Lombardi,&nbsp;Frederico A Dias,&nbsp;Helena H L Borba,&nbsp;Roberto Pontarolo,&nbsp;Astrid Wiens","doi":"10.24875/AIDSRev.200001071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The safety of using different antiretroviral therapies (ART) in pediatric HIV/AIDS patients is not well-established. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the safety of ART in children. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the safety of ART used by pediatric patients living with HIV/AIDS. The electronic search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus, in addition to a manual search. Studies were included if they assessed the safety of ART compared to placebo or another ART. Direct and indirect meta-analyses were conducted regarding safety outcomes. The systematic review included 21 RCTs. The studies included more than 5500 participants, and age ranged from 3 months to 18 years. The drugs evaluated were nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI); non-NRTI; and protease inhibitors. The predominant route of infection was vertical. Direct meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes sleep disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, respiratory disorders, hypertransaminasemia, neutropenia, hospitalization, and death. For these outcomes, no statistically significant differences were found. Indirect meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes anemia, gastrointestinal disorders, liver disorders, severe adverse events (AE), AE that led to changes in treatment, fever, and skin manifestations. However, no statistically significant differences were found for these outcomes. In this study, non-significant differences were detected in the safety of different ART used in pediatric individuals. The choice of appropriate therapy should be based on its efficacy and the individual characteristics of each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":7685,"journal":{"name":"AIDS reviews","volume":"23 4","pages":"196-203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/AIDSRev.200001071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The safety of using different antiretroviral therapies (ART) in pediatric HIV/AIDS patients is not well-established. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the safety of ART in children. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the safety of ART used by pediatric patients living with HIV/AIDS. The electronic search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus, in addition to a manual search. Studies were included if they assessed the safety of ART compared to placebo or another ART. Direct and indirect meta-analyses were conducted regarding safety outcomes. The systematic review included 21 RCTs. The studies included more than 5500 participants, and age ranged from 3 months to 18 years. The drugs evaluated were nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI); non-NRTI; and protease inhibitors. The predominant route of infection was vertical. Direct meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes sleep disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, respiratory disorders, hypertransaminasemia, neutropenia, hospitalization, and death. For these outcomes, no statistically significant differences were found. Indirect meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes anemia, gastrointestinal disorders, liver disorders, severe adverse events (AE), AE that led to changes in treatment, fever, and skin manifestations. However, no statistically significant differences were found for these outcomes. In this study, non-significant differences were detected in the safety of different ART used in pediatric individuals. The choice of appropriate therapy should be based on its efficacy and the individual characteristics of each patient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗逆转录病毒治疗儿童HIV/AIDS的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
在儿童艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者中使用不同抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的安全性尚未得到证实。因此,本研究旨在评估儿童抗逆转录病毒治疗的安全性。对随机临床试验(rct)进行了系统评价,以评估艾滋病毒/艾滋病儿童患者使用抗逆转录病毒药物的安全性。电子检索是在PubMed和Scopus中进行的,此外还有人工检索。与安慰剂或其他抗逆转录病毒治疗相比,评估抗逆转录病毒治疗安全性的研究被纳入。对安全性结果进行了直接和间接meta分析。系统评价包括21项随机对照试验。这些研究包括5500多名参与者,年龄从3个月到18岁不等。评估的药物有核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTI);non-NRTI;还有蛋白酶抑制剂。感染途径以垂直传播为主。对睡眠障碍、肝胆障碍、呼吸障碍、高转氨血症、中性粒细胞减少症、住院和死亡等结局进行直接荟萃分析。对于这些结果,没有发现统计学上的显著差异。对结果进行了间接荟萃分析,包括贫血、胃肠道疾病、肝脏疾病、严重不良事件(AE)、导致治疗改变的AE、发烧和皮肤表现。然而,这些结果没有发现统计学上的显著差异。在本研究中,在儿童个体中使用的不同抗逆转录病毒药物的安全性未发现显著差异。选择适当的治疗应根据其疗效和每个病人的个体特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS reviews
AIDS reviews 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Reviews publishes papers reporting original scientific, clinical, epidemiologic and social research which contribute to the overall knowledge of the field of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and human retrovirology. Currently, the Journal publishes review articles (usually by invitation, but spontaneous submitted articles will also be considered). Manuscripts submitted to AIDS Reviews will be accepted on the understanding that the authors have not submitted the paper to another journal or published the material elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Sexually transmitted infections keep rising up. The burden of HIV-1 and HIV-2 epidemics in Ivory Coast. Monkeypox 2024 outbreak. Playing catching up: Proceedings of the 1st Spanish conference on genomic medicine. Strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and avoid administrative stifling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1