Race/Ethnic Differences in Social Resources as Cognitive Risk and Protective Factors.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Research in Human Development Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1080/15427609.2020.1743809
Benjamin Katz, Indira Turney, Ji Hyun Lee, Reza Amini, Kristine Ajrouch, Toni Antonucci
{"title":"Race/Ethnic Differences in Social Resources as Cognitive Risk and Protective Factors.","authors":"Benjamin Katz,&nbsp;Indira Turney,&nbsp;Ji Hyun Lee,&nbsp;Reza Amini,&nbsp;Kristine Ajrouch,&nbsp;Toni Antonucci","doi":"10.1080/15427609.2020.1743809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Overall social network size, often the sum of common lifetime relationships, including children, family, and friends, has been linked to cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. However, little research has examined the association between network size composition and cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults in the context of race/ethnicity. We investigated the associations between the number of close children, family, and friends independently with executive function (EF) and memory across a subsample of non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White participants who completed the Health and Retirement Study Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (N = 2,395). We found that network size composition was more closely linked to EF than memory and that these associations varied by race/ethnicity. Specifically, the strongest associations existed between EF and quadratic estimates of the number of close children of non-Hispanic Black participants, and number of close family members for Hispanic participants. Among Black participants, a curvilinear relationship indicated that two close children were associated with greater EF, while a smaller or larger number of close children were associated with lower EF. On the other hand, among Hispanic participants, higher EF was associated with fewer (0-1) and greater (4-5+) numbers of family member contacts. Overall, these results indicate that examining children, family, and friends independently may be more useful than the common practice of aggregation of overall network size, especially in the context of race/ethnicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47096,"journal":{"name":"Research in Human Development","volume":"17 1","pages":"57-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15427609.2020.1743809","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2020.1743809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Overall social network size, often the sum of common lifetime relationships, including children, family, and friends, has been linked to cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. However, little research has examined the association between network size composition and cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults in the context of race/ethnicity. We investigated the associations between the number of close children, family, and friends independently with executive function (EF) and memory across a subsample of non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White participants who completed the Health and Retirement Study Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (N = 2,395). We found that network size composition was more closely linked to EF than memory and that these associations varied by race/ethnicity. Specifically, the strongest associations existed between EF and quadratic estimates of the number of close children of non-Hispanic Black participants, and number of close family members for Hispanic participants. Among Black participants, a curvilinear relationship indicated that two close children were associated with greater EF, while a smaller or larger number of close children were associated with lower EF. On the other hand, among Hispanic participants, higher EF was associated with fewer (0-1) and greater (4-5+) numbers of family member contacts. Overall, these results indicate that examining children, family, and friends independently may be more useful than the common practice of aggregation of overall network size, especially in the context of race/ethnicity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会资源的种族/民族差异作为认知风险和保护因素。
总的社会网络规模,通常是包括孩子、家庭和朋友在内的共同生活关系的总和,与认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病有关。然而,在种族/民族背景下,很少有研究调查中老年成年人的网络大小组成和认知功能之间的关系。我们对完成健康与退休研究协调认知评估方案的非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人参与者的子样本(N = 2395)进行了独立调查,研究了亲密子女、家庭和朋友的数量与执行功能(EF)和记忆之间的关系。我们发现,网络大小的组成与EF的关系比与记忆的关系更密切,而且这些关系因种族/民族而异。具体而言,EF与非西班牙裔黑人参与者的近亲子女数量和西班牙裔参与者的近亲家庭成员数量的二次估计之间存在最强烈的关联。在黑人参与者中,曲线关系表明两个亲密的孩子与更高的EF相关,而更少或更多的亲密孩子与更低的EF相关。另一方面,在西班牙裔参与者中,较高的EF与较少(0-1)和较多(4-5+)的家庭成员接触次数相关。总的来说,这些结果表明,独立调查孩子、家人和朋友可能比汇总整体网络规模的常见做法更有用,特别是在种族/民族背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Human Development
Research in Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of the white critical consciousness index A Lifecourse Perspective on Singlehood Age 19-30 Union Formation Trajectories Across The Past 30 Years Within The U.S.: Delineating Heterogeneity In Trajectories And Its Historical And Sociodemographic Variation TIME-VARYING CORRELATES OF ADULT SINGLEHOOD: EDUCATION, WORK, LIVING ARRANGEMENTS, AND MENTAL HEALTH RELATIONSHIP AND SINGLEHOOD TRAJECTORIES DURING THE TRANSITION TO OLDER ADULTHOOD OVER THE PAST 40 YEARS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1