[Paideia Education in primary care: an analysis of institutional democracy and power relations in health sector work practices].

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Salud Colectiva Pub Date : 2021-05-27 DOI:10.18294/sc.2021.3298
Mônica Martins de Oliveira Viana, Lilian Soares Vidal Terra
{"title":"[Paideia Education in primary care: an analysis of institutional democracy and power relations in health sector work practices].","authors":"Mônica Martins de Oliveira Viana,&nbsp;Lilian Soares Vidal Terra","doi":"10.18294/sc.2021.3298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article looks at two pedagogical initiatives based on \"Paideia Education\" in order to analyze their contributions to the production of democratic relations and the co-production of care in primary health care. The first of these initiatives was a seminar on matrix support (2015-2016) that trained 94 specialists, and the second was a seminar on family care (2018-2020) that trained 149 professionals. The 243 participating health professionals came from five different municipalities in Brazil. The results obtained through questionnaires and field diaries kept during the seminars indicate that \"Paideia Education\" has the ability to motivate professionals to incorporate notions such as the expanded clinic and matrix support into primary health care, and fosters the sharing of care and the co-construction of autonomy with users. However, authoritarian management practices are still frequently directed towards professionals, practiced among professionals themselves, and directed towards patients, and therefore it is necessary to invest in a greater democratization of services beyond training.</p>","PeriodicalId":44640,"journal":{"name":"Salud Colectiva","volume":"17 ","pages":"e3298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Colectiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2021.3298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article looks at two pedagogical initiatives based on "Paideia Education" in order to analyze their contributions to the production of democratic relations and the co-production of care in primary health care. The first of these initiatives was a seminar on matrix support (2015-2016) that trained 94 specialists, and the second was a seminar on family care (2018-2020) that trained 149 professionals. The 243 participating health professionals came from five different municipalities in Brazil. The results obtained through questionnaires and field diaries kept during the seminars indicate that "Paideia Education" has the ability to motivate professionals to incorporate notions such as the expanded clinic and matrix support into primary health care, and fosters the sharing of care and the co-construction of autonomy with users. However, authoritarian management practices are still frequently directed towards professionals, practiced among professionals themselves, and directed towards patients, and therefore it is necessary to invest in a greater democratization of services beyond training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[初级保健教育:对卫生部门工作实践中的体制民主和权力关系的分析]。
本文着眼于以"Paideia教育"为基础的两项教学举措,以分析它们对建立民主关系和在初级保健中共同提供护理的贡献。其中第一个倡议是矩阵支持研讨会(2015-2016年),培训了94名专家,第二个倡议是家庭护理研讨会(2018-2020年),培训了149名专业人员。243名参与调查的卫生专业人员来自巴西五个不同的城市。通过问卷调查和研讨会期间的现场日记获得的结果表明,"Paideia教育"能够激励专业人员将诸如扩大诊所和矩阵支持等概念纳入初级卫生保健,并促进与用户共享护理和共同构建自主权。然而,专制的管理做法仍然经常针对专业人员,在专业人员本身中实施,并针对患者,因此有必要投资于培训以外的服务的更大民主化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Salud Colectiva
Salud Colectiva PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Salud Colectiva publica análisis y resultados de investigaciones, debates entre diferentes autores, artículos de opinión, conferencias, documentos y reseñas históricas, en español, que problematicen el campo de la Salud Colectiva desde diferentes disciplinas y saberes.
期刊最新文献
[Racial inequality in the production of fresh vegetables and cut flowers in Argentina: an analysis in Greater La Plata]. [Use of psychotropic drugs among Indigenous and Quilombola communities in Brazil]. [Experiences and subjective transformations: suffering and coercion in the use of psychotropic drugs in psychiatric treatment in Chile]. [Racism and mental health in indigenous youth living in the Metropolitan Area of Oaxaca, Mexico]. [Jeremiah Noah Morris and social epidemiology].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1