Effectiveness of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait in Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Holistic Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-11 DOI:10.1097/HNP.0000000000000462
Francesco Burrai, Luigi Apuzzo, Renzo Zanotti
{"title":"Effectiveness of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait in Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Francesco Burrai, Luigi Apuzzo, Renzo Zanotti","doi":"10.1097/HNP.0000000000000462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parkinson disease is a neurodegenerative disease present in approximately 2% of the population older than 65 years. Rhythmic auditory stimulation in the early 1990s aimed to improve individual mobility in terms of gait speed, stride length, and cadence. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize and evaluate the evidence of the effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait speed, stride length, and cadence in patients with Parkinson disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to determine the efficacy of rhythmic auditory stimulation in patients with Parkinson disease. Five studies were included in the review (209 patients). Rhythmic auditory stimulation resulted, on average, a gait speed improvement of 0.53 standard deviation (SD) units (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.83; P = .0005), a stride length improvement of 0.51 SD units (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.84; P = .003) greater than that in the control group. All trials contained a risk of bias due to a lack of blinding. The quality of evidence was low. No adverse events were identified. Rhythmic auditory stimulation may have a beneficial effect on gait speed and stride length in patients with Parkinson disease. Future studies should consider a power analysis to recruit an adequate number of subjects and minimize the risk of sample bias. Further research should provide the additional results required for an acceptable estimate of the effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait in patients with Parkinson disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":13081,"journal":{"name":"Holistic Nursing Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Holistic Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parkinson disease is a neurodegenerative disease present in approximately 2% of the population older than 65 years. Rhythmic auditory stimulation in the early 1990s aimed to improve individual mobility in terms of gait speed, stride length, and cadence. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize and evaluate the evidence of the effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait speed, stride length, and cadence in patients with Parkinson disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to determine the efficacy of rhythmic auditory stimulation in patients with Parkinson disease. Five studies were included in the review (209 patients). Rhythmic auditory stimulation resulted, on average, a gait speed improvement of 0.53 standard deviation (SD) units (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.83; P = .0005), a stride length improvement of 0.51 SD units (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.84; P = .003) greater than that in the control group. All trials contained a risk of bias due to a lack of blinding. The quality of evidence was low. No adverse events were identified. Rhythmic auditory stimulation may have a beneficial effect on gait speed and stride length in patients with Parkinson disease. Future studies should consider a power analysis to recruit an adequate number of subjects and minimize the risk of sample bias. Further research should provide the additional results required for an acceptable estimate of the effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait in patients with Parkinson disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有节奏的听觉刺激对帕金森病患者步态的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。
帕金森病是一种神经退行性疾病,65 岁以上人群中约有 2%患有此病。20 世纪 90 年代初,有节奏的听觉刺激旨在改善个人在步速、步幅和步调方面的活动能力。我们的系统综述和荟萃分析旨在总结和评估节奏性听觉刺激对帕金森病患者步速、步幅和步调影响的证据。我们对随机对照试验进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定节奏性听觉刺激对帕金森病患者的疗效。该研究共纳入了五项研究(209 名患者)。与对照组相比,节奏性听觉刺激可使步速平均提高 0.53 个标准差 (SD) 单位(95% CI,0.23 至 0.83;P = 0.0005),步长平均提高 0.51 个标准差单位(95% CI,0.18 至 0.84;P = 0.003)。由于缺乏盲法,所有试验都存在偏倚风险。证据质量较低。未发现不良事件。有节奏的听觉刺激可能会对帕金森病患者的步速和步幅产生有益影响。未来的研究应考虑进行功率分析,以招募足够数量的受试者,并将样本偏倚的风险降至最低。进一步的研究应提供所需的额外结果,以便对有节奏的听觉刺激对帕金森病患者步态的影响做出可接受的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Holistic Nursing Practice
Holistic Nursing Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-NURSING
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Holistic Nursing Practice (HNP), The Science of Health and Healing, is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that explores holistic models of nursing practice. Content emphasizes complementary traditional and holistic nursing and healthcare practices. Articles include theory-based interventions and their outcomes, including: innovations in holistic nursing practice; research related to holistic nursing practice, health care, and policy; and values and ethical-legal issues related to holistic nursing practices. The holistic approach is a worldview that emphasizes the potential for health and healing in human systems rather than on disease process and deficit.
期刊最新文献
Farewell Reflections and End Notes. Holistic Nursing Practice: An Editor's Farewell. Effects of Yoga in the Care of Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review. Effects of Yoga on Stress in Pregnant Women. The Effect of Reiki on the Self-Efficacy, Death Anxiety, and Sleep Quality of Patients Diagnosed With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized-Controlled Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1