Combined spinal epidural anesthesia in obese parturients undergoing cesarean surgery : A single-blinded randomized comparison of lateral decubitus and sitting positions.

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Anaesthesist Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s00101-021-00995-8
Fatma Okucu, Mehmet Aksoy, Ilker Ince, Ayse Nur Aksoy, Aysenur Dostbıl, Ozgur Ozmen
{"title":"Combined spinal epidural anesthesia in obese parturients undergoing cesarean surgery : A single-blinded randomized comparison of lateral decubitus and sitting positions.","authors":"Fatma Okucu,&nbsp;Mehmet Aksoy,&nbsp;Ilker Ince,&nbsp;Ayse Nur Aksoy,&nbsp;Aysenur Dostbıl,&nbsp;Ozgur Ozmen","doi":"10.1007/s00101-021-00995-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a significant increase in number of obese pregnant women worldwide. Obese parturients undergoing cesarean section have a higher risk for hypotension and require higher doses of vasopressors following spinal anesthesia compared to nonobese parturients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the maternal hemodynamic changes when combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is induced in the left lateral decubitus and sitting positions in obese pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this study, pregnant women with full-term gestation diagnosed as obese undergoing elective cesarean section were included. Two groups were formed: the CSEA was performed in left lateral position in group I (n = 50) and in sitting position in group II (n = 50). At the end of the CSEA procedure, patients were placed in the supine position. When the sensory block reached at the upper level of T6 dermatome, surgery was initiated. Hemodynamic, anesthetic and neonatal parameters were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all patients, CSEA was successful and sufficient anesthesia was provided for surgery. Time to reach T6 dermatome sensory level in group II was found to be longer than group I (P = 0.011). At 20 min after spinal injection, the maximum sensory block level was similar in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of sensory block time and the time to requiring postoperative supplemental analgesics. There were no significant differences in terms of the volume of intravenous fluid administered, ephedrine and atropine requirements between groups. Both groups had similar systolic blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation values during surgery and postoperatively. While both groups had similar diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values during surgery and at the 1st postoperative hour, group II had lower DBP values at the 2nd postoperative hour compared with group I (P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Left lateral decubitus and sitting positions during performance of CSEA lead to similar maternal hemodynamic changes in obese pregnant women undergoing cesarean section.</p>","PeriodicalId":50796,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesist","volume":" ","pages":"30-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00101-021-00995-8","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-00995-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a significant increase in number of obese pregnant women worldwide. Obese parturients undergoing cesarean section have a higher risk for hypotension and require higher doses of vasopressors following spinal anesthesia compared to nonobese parturients.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the maternal hemodynamic changes when combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is induced in the left lateral decubitus and sitting positions in obese pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section.

Material and methods: In this study, pregnant women with full-term gestation diagnosed as obese undergoing elective cesarean section were included. Two groups were formed: the CSEA was performed in left lateral position in group I (n = 50) and in sitting position in group II (n = 50). At the end of the CSEA procedure, patients were placed in the supine position. When the sensory block reached at the upper level of T6 dermatome, surgery was initiated. Hemodynamic, anesthetic and neonatal parameters were recorded.

Results: In all patients, CSEA was successful and sufficient anesthesia was provided for surgery. Time to reach T6 dermatome sensory level in group II was found to be longer than group I (P = 0.011). At 20 min after spinal injection, the maximum sensory block level was similar in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of sensory block time and the time to requiring postoperative supplemental analgesics. There were no significant differences in terms of the volume of intravenous fluid administered, ephedrine and atropine requirements between groups. Both groups had similar systolic blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation values during surgery and postoperatively. While both groups had similar diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values during surgery and at the 1st postoperative hour, group II had lower DBP values at the 2nd postoperative hour compared with group I (P = 0.04).

Conclusion: Left lateral decubitus and sitting positions during performance of CSEA lead to similar maternal hemodynamic changes in obese pregnant women undergoing cesarean section.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产手术肥胖产妇腰硬膜外联合麻醉:侧卧位和坐位的单盲随机比较。
背景:世界范围内肥胖孕妇的数量显著增加。与非肥胖孕妇相比,接受剖宫产手术的肥胖孕妇有更高的低血压风险,在脊髓麻醉后需要更高剂量的血管加压剂。目的:比较肥胖孕妇择期剖宫产术中左侧卧位和坐位腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)对产妇血流动力学的影响。材料与方法:本研究纳入诊断为肥胖的足月妊娠孕妇择期剖宫产。分为两组:第一组采用左侧体位(n = 50),第二组采用坐位(n = 50)。在CSEA手术结束时,将患者置于仰卧位。当感觉阻滞到达T6皮节上部时,开始手术。记录血流动力学、麻醉及新生儿参数。结果:所有患者CSEA均成功,手术麻醉充足。II组患者达到T6感觉水平的时间明显长于I组(P = 0.011)。在脊髓注射后20 min,两组的最大感觉阻滞水平相似。在感觉阻滞时间和术后需要补充镇痛药的时间方面,两组间无显著差异。两组间静脉输液量、麻黄碱和阿托品需要量均无显著差异。两组患者术中及术后收缩压、心率、血氧饱和度相近。两组患者术中及术后1小时舒张压(DBP)值相近,但术后2小时舒张压(DBP)值低于1组(P = 0.04)。结论:剖宫产术中肥胖孕妇左侧卧位和坐姿导致母体血流动力学变化相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesist
Anaesthesist 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Anaesthesist is an internationally recognized journal de­aling with all aspects of anaesthesia and intensive medicine up to pain therapy. Der Anaesthesist addresses all specialists and scientists particularly interested in anaesthesiology and it is neighbouring areas. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics reflecting the multidisciplinary environment including pharmacotherapy, intensive medicine, emergency medicine, regional anaesthetics, pain therapy and medical law. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of relevant clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the effects of total intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on postoperative cognitive recovery. [Respiratory support in COVID-19: all in due time!] [COVID-19: a chance for digitalization of teaching? : Report of experiences and results of a survey on digitalized teaching in the fields of anesthesiology, intensive care, emergency, pain and palliative medicine at the University of Leipzig]. [Perioperative management of the brain-dead organ donor : Anesthesia between ethics and evidence]. [Noninvasive respiratory support and invasive ventilation in COVID‑19 : Where do we stand today?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1