Treatment Compliance Communications Between Patients with Severe Mental Illness and Treating Healthcare Providers: A Retrospective Study of Documentation Using Healthcare Reimbursement Claims and Medical Chart Abstraction.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2021-06-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S303453
Carolyn Martin, Eleena Koep, John White, Angela Belland, Heidi Waters, Felicia Forma
{"title":"Treatment Compliance Communications Between Patients with Severe Mental Illness and Treating Healthcare Providers: A Retrospective Study of Documentation Using Healthcare Reimbursement Claims and Medical Chart Abstraction.","authors":"Carolyn Martin,&nbsp;Eleena Koep,&nbsp;John White,&nbsp;Angela Belland,&nbsp;Heidi Waters,&nbsp;Felicia Forma","doi":"10.2147/POR.S303453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Successful treatment for serious mental illnesses (SMIs) requires a good therapeutic alliance with healthcare providers and compliance with prescribed therapies such as antipsychotic medications. This retrospective study, which utilized administrative claims linked with abstracted medical chart data, addressed a data gap regarding compliance-related discussions between providers and patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Commercially insured patients in ambulatory care post-acute (emergency or inpatient) event were eligible. Criteria included age 18-65 years; schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder diagnoses; continuous enrollment 6 months before to 12 months after the first acute event claim dated 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2015; and antipsychotic medication prescription. Demographic and clinical data, and patient-provider discussions about treatment compliance were characterized from claims and abstracted medical charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety patients (62% female, mean age 41 years) were included and 680 visits were abstracted; only 58% had first-visit antipsychotic compliance discussions. Notably, 18% of patients had discussions using the specific terms \"compliance,\" \"persistence,\" or \"adherence,\" whereas half were identified by more general terms. Compliance discussions were observed least often among the patients with schizophrenia, as compared with bipolar or major depressive disorders-a counterintuitive finding.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Compliance discussions may represent intervention opportunities to optimize treatment, yet their study is a complex endeavor. The results of this study show an opportunity to improve this valuable treatment step.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d4/28/por-12-49.PMC8214573.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S303453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Successful treatment for serious mental illnesses (SMIs) requires a good therapeutic alliance with healthcare providers and compliance with prescribed therapies such as antipsychotic medications. This retrospective study, which utilized administrative claims linked with abstracted medical chart data, addressed a data gap regarding compliance-related discussions between providers and patients.

Methods: Commercially insured patients in ambulatory care post-acute (emergency or inpatient) event were eligible. Criteria included age 18-65 years; schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder diagnoses; continuous enrollment 6 months before to 12 months after the first acute event claim dated 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2015; and antipsychotic medication prescription. Demographic and clinical data, and patient-provider discussions about treatment compliance were characterized from claims and abstracted medical charts.

Results: Ninety patients (62% female, mean age 41 years) were included and 680 visits were abstracted; only 58% had first-visit antipsychotic compliance discussions. Notably, 18% of patients had discussions using the specific terms "compliance," "persistence," or "adherence," whereas half were identified by more general terms. Compliance discussions were observed least often among the patients with schizophrenia, as compared with bipolar or major depressive disorders-a counterintuitive finding.

Discussion: Compliance discussions may represent intervention opportunities to optimize treatment, yet their study is a complex endeavor. The results of this study show an opportunity to improve this valuable treatment step.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重精神疾病患者与医疗服务提供者之间的治疗依从性沟通:医疗报销报销和医疗图表抽象文件的回顾性研究
简介:成功治疗严重精神疾病(SMIs)需要良好的治疗联盟与医疗保健提供者和遵守规定的治疗,如抗精神病药物。这项回顾性研究利用了与抽象医疗图表数据相关的行政索赔,解决了提供者和患者之间关于合规相关讨论的数据缺口。方法:商业保险患者在急性(急诊或住院)事件后接受门诊治疗。标准包括年龄18-65岁;精神分裂症、双相情感障碍或重度抑郁症诊断;2014年1月1日至2015年12月31日首次急性事件索赔前6个月至12个月连续入组;还有抗精神病药物处方。人口统计和临床数据以及患者与提供者关于治疗依从性的讨论以索赔和抽象的医疗图表为特征。结果:纳入90例患者(62%为女性,平均年龄41岁),提取680例就诊;只有58%的患者在首次就诊时讨论过抗精神病药物依从性。值得注意的是,18%的患者使用“依从性”、“持久性”或“依从性”等特定术语进行讨论,而一半的患者使用更一般的术语进行讨论。与双相情感障碍或重度抑郁症患者相比,精神分裂症患者的依从性讨论最少——这是一个违反直觉的发现。讨论:依从性讨论可能代表优化治疗的干预机会,但他们的研究是一项复杂的努力。这项研究的结果显示了改善这一有价值的治疗步骤的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
UK Electronic Healthcare Records for Research: A Scientometric Analysis of Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and COVID-19 Publications. A Real-World Study on the Short-Term Efficacy of Amlodipine in Treating Hypertension Among Inpatients. Therapeutic Advances in Obesity: How Real-World Evidence Impacts Affordability Beyond Standard of Care. Quality of Life in Patients Affected by Facial Basal Cell Carcinoma: Prospective Longitudinal Pilot Study and Validation of Skin Cancer Index in Lithuanian Language. Advanced Multi-Layer Watertight Closure versus Conventional Closure in Total Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1