Metabolic Surgery Outcomes in U.S. Patients with Class I Obesity.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-10 DOI:10.1089/bari.2020.0046
Dustin Baldwin, Lisa Sanchez-Johnsen, Roberto Bustos, Alberto Mangano, Mario Masrur
{"title":"Metabolic Surgery Outcomes in U.S. Patients with Class I Obesity.","authors":"Dustin Baldwin,&nbsp;Lisa Sanchez-Johnsen,&nbsp;Roberto Bustos,&nbsp;Alberto Mangano,&nbsp;Mario Masrur","doi":"10.1089/bari.2020.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Although numerous studies outside the United States (U.S.) have explored weight loss and comorbidity resolution among patients with class I obesity (body mass index [BMI] 30-34.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) after metabolic surgery, few U.S.-based studies have been conducted. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> Our aim was to compare weight loss and comorbidity resolution among U.S. patients with class I obesity, who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Weight loss and comorbidity data among only patients with class I obesity, who underwent LSG or RYGB, were examined. Between April 2009 and April 2017, 1215 metabolic surgeries were performed with 30 patients meeting the inclusion criteria (17 LSG and 13 RYGB). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Percent total weight loss (%TWL) for LSG peaked at 12 months (20.85%), while RYGB %TWL peaked at 18 months (21.65%). Percent excess weight loss (%EWL) peaked at 12 months after LSG (83.59%) and 18 months after RYGB (98.29%). Overall follow-up was 56.3%, 36.7%, and 43.3% at 12, 18, and 24 months. LSG and RYGB were both successful with regard to resolution of medical comorbidities at 12 months. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> RYGB and LSG appear to have similar, successful outcomes among U.S. patients with class I obesity for weight loss and comorbidity resolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48848,"journal":{"name":"Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care","volume":"16 2","pages":"85-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217597/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bari.2020.0046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Although numerous studies outside the United States (U.S.) have explored weight loss and comorbidity resolution among patients with class I obesity (body mass index [BMI] 30-34.9 kg/m2) after metabolic surgery, few U.S.-based studies have been conducted. Objective: Our aim was to compare weight loss and comorbidity resolution among U.S. patients with class I obesity, who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Methods: Weight loss and comorbidity data among only patients with class I obesity, who underwent LSG or RYGB, were examined. Between April 2009 and April 2017, 1215 metabolic surgeries were performed with 30 patients meeting the inclusion criteria (17 LSG and 13 RYGB). Results: Percent total weight loss (%TWL) for LSG peaked at 12 months (20.85%), while RYGB %TWL peaked at 18 months (21.65%). Percent excess weight loss (%EWL) peaked at 12 months after LSG (83.59%) and 18 months after RYGB (98.29%). Overall follow-up was 56.3%, 36.7%, and 43.3% at 12, 18, and 24 months. LSG and RYGB were both successful with regard to resolution of medical comorbidities at 12 months. Conclusion: RYGB and LSG appear to have similar, successful outcomes among U.S. patients with class I obesity for weight loss and comorbidity resolution.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国I级肥胖患者的代谢手术结果
背景:尽管美国以外的许多研究已经探讨了代谢手术后I级肥胖(体重指数[BMI] 30-34.9 kg/m2)患者的体重减轻和合并症的解决,但美国的研究很少进行。目的:我们的目的是比较美国I级肥胖患者接受腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LSG)和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)的体重减轻和合并症解决情况。方法:仅检查接受LSG或RYGB治疗的I级肥胖患者的体重减轻和合并症数据。2009年4月至2017年4月,共进行1215例代谢手术,其中30例患者符合纳入标准(17例LSG和13例RYGB)。结果:LSG组总减重百分比(%TWL)在12个月达到峰值(20.85%),RYGB组总减重百分比(%TWL)在18个月达到峰值(21.65%)。过量减重百分比(%EWL)在LSG后12个月达到高峰(83.59%),RYGB后18个月达到高峰(98.29%)。12、18和24个月的总随访率分别为56.3%、36.7%和43.3%。LSG和RYGB在12个月时都成功地解决了医疗合并症。结论:RYGB和LSG似乎在美国I级肥胖患者的体重减轻和合并症解决方面具有相似的成功结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care is the essential peer-reviewed journal delivering clinical best practices and quality updates for achieving optimal bariatric surgical outcomes. Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care coverage includes: Quality outcomes measurement and reporting Process innovations and care delivery Short- and long-term surgical complications Pre-surgical diagnosis and consultation Pre-op, peri-op, and post-op standards of practice Patient access Patient safety issues Nutritional and dietary support Bariatric surgical emergencies Best practices and current standards for bariatric surgery Culture and ethics Body contouring and reconstructive surgery Bariatric teamwork and communication.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Autonomic Neural Blockade Timing During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Pain, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, and Analgesic Consumption Letter from the Editor Pancreatitis After Placement of the Bariatric Intragastric Balloon Is Not Related to Off-Protocol Use: An Analysis of 39 Cases Correlation of Preoperative Prognostic Laboratory Markers with Bariatric Surgery-Related Complications When Bigger Is Better: Can Bariatric Surgery Boost Low-Density Lipoprotein Particle Size for Improved Health?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1