Infection Rate and Outcomes of Watchman Devices: Results from a Single-Center 14-Year Experience.

Biomedicine Hub Pub Date : 2021-06-03 eCollection Date: 2021-05-01 DOI:10.1159/000516400
Robert C Ward, Trevon McGill, Fadi Adel, Shiva Ponamgi, Samuel J Asirvatham, Larry M Baddour, David R Holmes, Daniel C DeSimone, Christopher V DeSimone
{"title":"Infection Rate and Outcomes of Watchman Devices: Results from a Single-Center 14-Year Experience.","authors":"Robert C Ward,&nbsp;Trevon McGill,&nbsp;Fadi Adel,&nbsp;Shiva Ponamgi,&nbsp;Samuel J Asirvatham,&nbsp;Larry M Baddour,&nbsp;David R Holmes,&nbsp;Daniel C DeSimone,&nbsp;Christopher V DeSimone","doi":"10.1159/000516400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Watchman device (WD) is a commonly used alternative strategy to oral anticoagulation for stroke risk reduction in patients with atrial fibrillation who have an increased bleeding risk. There are rare case reports of WD-related infection. Currently, there is no formal study that has systematically evaluated the incidence and outcomes WD-related infections. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for WD-associated infections in a single-center cohort over a 14-year period. All patients who underwent WD implantation over a 14-year study period (July 2004 through December 2018) comprised our cohort. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and postimplantation events were identified through a retrospective chart review. Primary study outcomes included WD-related infection, other cardiovascular device-related infection, bacteremia, and mortality. A total of 181 patients (119 males; 65.7%) with a mean age of 75 years at implantation were included in the analysis. A total of 534.7 patient years of follow-up was accrued, with an average of 2.9 years per patient. The most common indications for implantation included gastrointestinal bleeding (56 patients; 30.9%) and intracerebral bleeding (51 patients; 28.2%). During the follow-up period, 37 (20.4%) patients died. Six developed evidence of bacteremia. Only 1 developed an implantable cardioverter defibrillator infection that required a complete system extraction. None of the cohort developed a WD-related device infection during the study period. We concluded that there is a low risk of WD-related infection even in the setting of a blood stream infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":9075,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine Hub","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000516400","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine Hub","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000516400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Watchman device (WD) is a commonly used alternative strategy to oral anticoagulation for stroke risk reduction in patients with atrial fibrillation who have an increased bleeding risk. There are rare case reports of WD-related infection. Currently, there is no formal study that has systematically evaluated the incidence and outcomes WD-related infections. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for WD-associated infections in a single-center cohort over a 14-year period. All patients who underwent WD implantation over a 14-year study period (July 2004 through December 2018) comprised our cohort. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and postimplantation events were identified through a retrospective chart review. Primary study outcomes included WD-related infection, other cardiovascular device-related infection, bacteremia, and mortality. A total of 181 patients (119 males; 65.7%) with a mean age of 75 years at implantation were included in the analysis. A total of 534.7 patient years of follow-up was accrued, with an average of 2.9 years per patient. The most common indications for implantation included gastrointestinal bleeding (56 patients; 30.9%) and intracerebral bleeding (51 patients; 28.2%). During the follow-up period, 37 (20.4%) patients died. Six developed evidence of bacteremia. Only 1 developed an implantable cardioverter defibrillator infection that required a complete system extraction. None of the cohort developed a WD-related device infection during the study period. We concluded that there is a low risk of WD-related infection even in the setting of a blood stream infection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Watchman装置的感染率和结果:来自单中心14年的经验。
Watchman装置(WD)是一种常用的替代策略口服抗凝治疗卒中风险降低心房颤动患者谁有增加的出血风险。有罕见的与白喉病有关的感染病例报告。目前,还没有正式的研究系统地评估与疟疾有关的感染的发生率和结果。本研究的目的是评估14年单中心队列中wd相关感染的发生率、危险因素和结局。在14年的研究期间(2004年7月至2018年12月),所有接受WD植入的患者都包括在我们的队列中。通过回顾性图表回顾确定了基线特征、手术数据和植入后事件。主要研究结果包括wd相关感染、其他心血管装置相关感染、菌血症和死亡率。共181例患者(男性119例;65.7%),植入时平均年龄为75岁。随访时间为534.7患者年,平均每位患者2.9年。植入最常见的适应症包括胃肠道出血(56例;30.9%)和脑出血(51例;28.2%)。随访期间,37例(20.4%)患者死亡。6人出现菌血症的迹象。只有1例发生植入式心律转复除颤器感染,需要整个系统摘除。在研究期间,该队列中没有人发生与wd相关的设备感染。我们得出的结论是,即使在血流感染的情况下,与wd相关的感染的风险也很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Folate Receptor Beta Signaling in the Regulation of Macrophage Antimicrobial Immune Response: A Scoping Review Estimation of the Variance Components in TP53 mRNA Expression in the Rat Lens after in vivo Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation B. Physical Activity among Primary Health Care Physicians and Its Impact on Counseling Practices. A Potential Off-Target Effect of the Wnt/β-Catenin Inhibitor KYA1797K: PD-L1 Binding and Checkpoint Inhibition. Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1