A cost study for mobile phone health surveys using interactive voice response for assessing risk factors of noncommunicable diseases.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Population Health Metrics Pub Date : 2021-06-28 DOI:10.1186/s12963-021-00258-z
Andres I Vecino-Ortiz, Madhuram Nagarajan, Kenneth Roger Katumba, Shamima Akhter, Raymond Tweheyo, Dustin G Gibson, Joseph Ali, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Iqbal Ansary Khan, Alain Labrique, George W Pariyo
{"title":"A cost study for mobile phone health surveys using interactive voice response for assessing risk factors of noncommunicable diseases.","authors":"Andres I Vecino-Ortiz,&nbsp;Madhuram Nagarajan,&nbsp;Kenneth Roger Katumba,&nbsp;Shamima Akhter,&nbsp;Raymond Tweheyo,&nbsp;Dustin G Gibson,&nbsp;Joseph Ali,&nbsp;Elizeus Rutebemberwa,&nbsp;Iqbal Ansary Khan,&nbsp;Alain Labrique,&nbsp;George W Pariyo","doi":"10.1186/s12963-021-00258-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This is the first study to examine the costs of conducting a mobile phone survey (MPS) through interactive voice response (IVR) to collect information on risk factors for noncommunicable diseases (NCD) in three low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); Bangladesh, Colombia, and Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a micro-costing study conducted from the perspective of the payer/funder with a 1-year horizon. The study evaluates the fixed costs and variable costs of implementing one nationally representative MPS for NCD risk factors of the adult population. In this costing study, we estimated the sample size of calls required to achieve a population-representative survey and associated incentives. Cost inputs were obtained from direct economic costs incurred by a central study team, from country-specific collaborators, and from platform developers who participated in the deployment of these MPS during 2017. Costs were reported in US dollars (USD). A sensitivity analysis was conducted assessing different scenarios of pricing and incentive strategies. Also, costs were calculated for a survey deployed targeting only adults younger than 45 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We estimated the fixed costs ranging between $47,000 USD and $74,000 USD. Variable costs were found to be between $32,000 USD and $129,000 USD per nationally representative survey. The main cost driver was the number of calls required to meet the sample size, and its variability largely depends on the extent of mobile phone coverage and access in the country. Therefore, a larger number of calls were estimated to survey specific harder-to-reach sub-populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mobile phone surveys have the potential to be a relatively less expensive and timely method of collecting survey information than face-to-face surveys, allowing decision-makers to deploy survey-based monitoring or evaluation programs more frequently than it would be possible having only face-to-face contact. The main driver of variable costs is survey time, and most of the variability across countries is attributable to the sampling differences associated to reaching out to population subgroups with low mobile phone ownership or access.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12963-021-00258-z","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-021-00258-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: This is the first study to examine the costs of conducting a mobile phone survey (MPS) through interactive voice response (IVR) to collect information on risk factors for noncommunicable diseases (NCD) in three low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); Bangladesh, Colombia, and Uganda.

Methods: This is a micro-costing study conducted from the perspective of the payer/funder with a 1-year horizon. The study evaluates the fixed costs and variable costs of implementing one nationally representative MPS for NCD risk factors of the adult population. In this costing study, we estimated the sample size of calls required to achieve a population-representative survey and associated incentives. Cost inputs were obtained from direct economic costs incurred by a central study team, from country-specific collaborators, and from platform developers who participated in the deployment of these MPS during 2017. Costs were reported in US dollars (USD). A sensitivity analysis was conducted assessing different scenarios of pricing and incentive strategies. Also, costs were calculated for a survey deployed targeting only adults younger than 45 years.

Results: We estimated the fixed costs ranging between $47,000 USD and $74,000 USD. Variable costs were found to be between $32,000 USD and $129,000 USD per nationally representative survey. The main cost driver was the number of calls required to meet the sample size, and its variability largely depends on the extent of mobile phone coverage and access in the country. Therefore, a larger number of calls were estimated to survey specific harder-to-reach sub-populations.

Conclusion: Mobile phone surveys have the potential to be a relatively less expensive and timely method of collecting survey information than face-to-face surveys, allowing decision-makers to deploy survey-based monitoring or evaluation programs more frequently than it would be possible having only face-to-face contact. The main driver of variable costs is survey time, and most of the variability across countries is attributable to the sampling differences associated to reaching out to population subgroups with low mobile phone ownership or access.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用交互式语音应答评估非传染性疾病风险因素的移动电话健康调查成本研究。
背景:这是第一个研究在三个低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)通过交互式语音应答(IVR)进行移动电话调查(MPS)以收集有关非传染性疾病(NCD)危险因素信息的成本的研究;孟加拉国,哥伦比亚和乌干达。方法:这是一项微观成本研究,从付款人/资助者的角度进行,为期1年。该研究评估了针对成人非传染性疾病危险因素实施一项具有全国代表性的MPS的固定成本和可变成本。在这项成本研究中,我们估计了实现人口代表性调查和相关激励措施所需的电话样本量。成本投入来自中央研究团队、特定国家的合作者以及2017年参与部署这些MPS的平台开发人员所产生的直接经济成本。成本以美元(USD)报告。对不同情景下的定价和激励策略进行了敏感性分析。此外,还计算了一项仅针对45岁以下成年人的调查的成本。结果:我们估计固定成本在47,000美元到74,000美元之间。每个具有全国代表性的调查发现可变成本在32,000美元至129,000美元之间。主要的成本驱动因素是满足样本量所需的通话次数,其变化在很大程度上取决于该国移动电话覆盖和接入的程度。因此,估计有更多的电话用于调查特定的难以到达的亚种群。结论:与面对面的调查相比,手机调查有可能成为一种相对便宜和及时的收集调查信息的方法,使决策者能够比面对面接触更频繁地部署基于调查的监测或评估方案。可变成本的主要驱动因素是调查时间,而各国之间的差异主要归因于与接触移动电话拥有率或接入率较低的人口亚群相关的抽样差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Population Health Metrics
Population Health Metrics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.
期刊最新文献
Deriving disability weights for the Netherlands: findings from the Dutch disability weights measurement study. Quantifying the magnitude of the general contextual effect in a multilevel study of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Ontario, Canada: application of the median rate ratio in population health research. Standardised reporting of burden of disease studies: the STROBOD statement. Population age structure dependency of the excess mortality P-score. Automated mortality coding for improved health policy in the Philippines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1