Damage control in penetrating duodenal trauma: less is better - the sequel.

Pub Date : 2021-05-03 DOI:10.25100/cm.v52i2.4509
Carlos A Ordoñez, Michael W Parra, Mauricio Millán, Yaset Caicedo, Natalia Padilla, Alberto García, María Josefa Franco, Gonzalo Aristizábal, Luis Eduardo Toro, Luis Fernando Pino, Adolfo González-Hadad, Mario Alain Herrera, José Julián Serna, Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín, Alexander Salcedo, Claudia Orlas, Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez, Fabian Hernández, Ricardo Ferrada, Rao Ivatury
{"title":"Damage control in penetrating duodenal trauma: less is better - the sequel.","authors":"Carlos A Ordoñez, Michael W Parra, Mauricio Millán, Yaset Caicedo, Natalia Padilla, Alberto García, María Josefa Franco, Gonzalo Aristizábal, Luis Eduardo Toro, Luis Fernando Pino, Adolfo González-Hadad, Mario Alain Herrera, José Julián Serna, Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín, Alexander Salcedo, Claudia Orlas, Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez, Fabian Hernández, Ricardo Ferrada, Rao Ivatury","doi":"10.25100/cm.v52i2.4509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The overall incidence of duodenal injuries in severely injured trauma patients is between 0.2 to 0.6% and the overall prevalence in those suffering from abdominal trauma is 3 to 5%. Approximately 80% of these cases are secondary to penetrating trauma, commonly associated with vascular and adjacent organ injuries. Therefore, defining the best surgical treatment algorithm remains controversial. Mild to moderate duodenal trauma is currently managed via primary repair and simple surgical techniques. However, severe injuries have required complex surgical techniques without significant favorable outcomes and a consequential increase in mortality rates. This article aims to delineate the experience in the surgical management of penetrating duodenal injuries via the creation of a practical and effective algorithm that includes basic principles of damage control surgery that sticks to the philosophy of \"Less is Better\". Surgical management of all penetrating duodenal trauma should always default when possible to primary repair. When confronted with a complex duodenal injury, hemodynamic instability, and/or significant associated injuries, the default should be damage control surgery. Definitive reconstructive surgery should be postponed until the patient has been adequately resuscitated and the diamond of death has been corrected.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"52 2","pages":"e4104509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/66/33/1657-9534-cm-52-02-e4104509.PMC8216054.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v52i2.4509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overall incidence of duodenal injuries in severely injured trauma patients is between 0.2 to 0.6% and the overall prevalence in those suffering from abdominal trauma is 3 to 5%. Approximately 80% of these cases are secondary to penetrating trauma, commonly associated with vascular and adjacent organ injuries. Therefore, defining the best surgical treatment algorithm remains controversial. Mild to moderate duodenal trauma is currently managed via primary repair and simple surgical techniques. However, severe injuries have required complex surgical techniques without significant favorable outcomes and a consequential increase in mortality rates. This article aims to delineate the experience in the surgical management of penetrating duodenal injuries via the creation of a practical and effective algorithm that includes basic principles of damage control surgery that sticks to the philosophy of "Less is Better". Surgical management of all penetrating duodenal trauma should always default when possible to primary repair. When confronted with a complex duodenal injury, hemodynamic instability, and/or significant associated injuries, the default should be damage control surgery. Definitive reconstructive surgery should be postponed until the patient has been adequately resuscitated and the diamond of death has been corrected.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
十二指肠穿透性创伤的损伤控制:越少越好--续集。
在严重受伤的创伤患者中,十二指肠损伤的总发病率在 0.2% 到 0.6% 之间,而在腹部创伤患者中的总发病率为 3% 到 5%。这些病例中约有 80% 继发于穿透性创伤,通常伴有血管和邻近器官损伤。因此,确定最佳手术治疗算法仍存在争议。目前,轻度至中度十二指肠创伤可通过初级修复和简单的外科技术进行处理。然而,严重的十二指肠创伤需要复杂的外科技术,但效果并不明显,死亡率也随之增加。本文旨在通过建立一套实用有效的算法,包括损害控制手术的基本原则,坚持 "少即是好 "的理念,来阐述十二指肠穿透性损伤的手术治疗经验。所有穿透性十二指肠创伤的手术治疗都应尽可能采用初级修复术。如果十二指肠损伤复杂、血流动力学不稳定和/或伴有严重损伤,则应采取损伤控制手术。确定性的重建手术应推迟到病人得到充分抢救和死亡钻石得到纠正之后再进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1