Blended teaching versus traditional teaching for undergraduate physiotherapy students at the University of the Witwatersrand.

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2021-05-17 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1544
Sadiya Ravat, Paula Barnard-Ashton, Monique M Keller
{"title":"Blended teaching versus traditional teaching for undergraduate physiotherapy students at the University of the Witwatersrand.","authors":"Sadiya Ravat,&nbsp;Paula Barnard-Ashton,&nbsp;Monique M Keller","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shifting from face-to-face teaching to incorporating technology may prepare students better for future work as health professionals. Evidence of blended teaching's effect on the academic performance of undergraduate physiotherapy students' performance is scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of our study was to determine students' theoretical and clinical performance in a blended teaching module compared to their own performance in two knowledge areas taught face to face, and student perceptions of blended teaching in the third-year physiotherapy curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study design included 47 third-year physiotherapy students. The orthopaedic module was delivered using a blended teaching approach in two consecutive semesters, whilst two other physiotherapy knowledge areas, neuromusculoskeletal and cardiopulmonary, in the same semesters were delivered face to face. Theoretical and clinical performances of students were compared for significance and effect. Students were assessed on their theoretical and clinical knowledge in all areas using the same assessment methods. The students (<i>n</i> = 43) also completed a survey on their blended teaching experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly higher theoretical marks for orthopaedics were calculated compared to neuromusculoskeletal and cardiopulmonary for both semesters with a large positive effect (average Cohen <i>d</i> = 4.44) for blended teaching on theoretical examination performance; no statistically significant difference for clinical performances. Students felt engaged in the blended teaching process, and 72% preferred blended teaching over face-to-face teaching or online delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blended teaching improved the theoretical marks, demonstrating that knowledge acquisition was improved, but not clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The study contributes to the knowledge base of blended learning in Health Science Education in South Africa. The authors identified a gap where future studies should investigate the effect of blended learning on clinical performance outcomes as a continuation from this one.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"77 1","pages":"1544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182468/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Shifting from face-to-face teaching to incorporating technology may prepare students better for future work as health professionals. Evidence of blended teaching's effect on the academic performance of undergraduate physiotherapy students' performance is scarce.

Objective: The purpose of our study was to determine students' theoretical and clinical performance in a blended teaching module compared to their own performance in two knowledge areas taught face to face, and student perceptions of blended teaching in the third-year physiotherapy curriculum.

Methods: The cross-sectional study design included 47 third-year physiotherapy students. The orthopaedic module was delivered using a blended teaching approach in two consecutive semesters, whilst two other physiotherapy knowledge areas, neuromusculoskeletal and cardiopulmonary, in the same semesters were delivered face to face. Theoretical and clinical performances of students were compared for significance and effect. Students were assessed on their theoretical and clinical knowledge in all areas using the same assessment methods. The students (n = 43) also completed a survey on their blended teaching experience.

Results: Significantly higher theoretical marks for orthopaedics were calculated compared to neuromusculoskeletal and cardiopulmonary for both semesters with a large positive effect (average Cohen d = 4.44) for blended teaching on theoretical examination performance; no statistically significant difference for clinical performances. Students felt engaged in the blended teaching process, and 72% preferred blended teaching over face-to-face teaching or online delivery.

Conclusion: Blended teaching improved the theoretical marks, demonstrating that knowledge acquisition was improved, but not clinical performance.

Clinical implications: The study contributes to the knowledge base of blended learning in Health Science Education in South Africa. The authors identified a gap where future studies should investigate the effect of blended learning on clinical performance outcomes as a continuation from this one.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威特沃特斯兰德大学物理治疗本科学生的混合教学与传统教学。
背景:从面对面的教学转变为结合技术可以使学生更好地为未来的卫生专业人员工作做好准备。混合教学对本科物理治疗专业学生学业成绩影响的证据很少。目的:本研究的目的是比较学生在混合教学模块中的理论和临床表现与他们自己在面对面教学的两个知识领域的表现,以及学生对三年级物理治疗课程混合教学的看法。方法:采用横断面研究设计对47名理疗专业大三学生进行调查。骨科模块在连续两个学期中采用混合教学方法进行授课,而其他两个物理治疗知识领域,神经肌肉骨骼和心肺,在同一学期中进行面对面授课。比较学生的理论表现和临床表现的意义和效果。使用相同的评估方法对学生在所有领域的理论和临床知识进行评估。这些学生(n = 43)还完成了一份关于他们混合式教学经历的调查。结果:两学期骨科学科的理论成绩均显著高于神经肌肉骨骼学科和心肺学科,且混合教学对理论考试成绩有较大的正向影响(平均Cohen d = 4.44);临床表现差异无统计学意义。学生们觉得自己参与了混合式教学过程,72%的学生更喜欢混合式教学,而不是面对面教学或在线授课。结论:混合教学提高了理论分数,表明知识获取有所改善,但临床表现没有改善。临床意义:本研究有助于建立南非卫生科学教育混合学习的知识库。作者确定了一个差距,未来的研究应该调查混合学习对临床表现结果的影响,作为本研究的延续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Preventing deformities in paediatric cerebral palsy in poorly-resourced areas: A scoping review. Contextual factors experienced by mothers of children with special needs. Neurological examination of healthy term infants at ages 6 and 10 weeks in Tshwane District. Protracted exercise tolerance post-coronavirus disease 2019 in endurance athletes: A survey. Mental health content in the physiotherapy undergraduate curriculum in South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1