Dual contraceptive utilization and determinant factors among HIV positive women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020.

Alemu Degu Ayele, Bekalu Getnet Kassa, Fentahun Yenealem Beyene, Dagne Addisu Sewyew, Gedefaye Nibret Mihretie
{"title":"Dual contraceptive utilization and determinant factors among HIV positive women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020.","authors":"Alemu Degu Ayele,&nbsp;Bekalu Getnet Kassa,&nbsp;Fentahun Yenealem Beyene,&nbsp;Dagne Addisu Sewyew,&nbsp;Gedefaye Nibret Mihretie","doi":"10.1186/s40834-021-00161-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual contraceptive is the use of a barrier like condom along with any modern contraceptive methods which has double significance for the prevention STI including HIV and unintended pregnancy. The prevalence and determinants of dual contraceptive utilization described by different studies were highly inconsistent in Ethiopia. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence and determinants of dual contraceptive utilization among HIV positive women in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>International database mainly Pub Med, Google scholar, HINARI, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, AJOL was applied to identify original studies. STATA software version 14 was applied to analyze the pooled prevalence of dual contraceptive. I<sup>2</sup> test statistics was computed to check the presence of heterogeneity across the studies and eggers test was used to identify publication bias. The pooled prevalence of dual contraceptive utilization was estimated by using a random effects model. The associations between determinants and dual contraceptive utilization were evaluated by using both random and fixed effect models.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total 9 studies with 9168 HIV positive women were enrolled in this study. The pooled prevalence of dual contraceptive utilization among HIV positive women in Ethiopia was 26.14% (95% CI 21.20-31.08). Disclosure of HIV status (OR = 4.18,95%CI:2.26-7.72), partner involvement in post-test counselling (OR = 2.31,95%CI:1.63-3.25), open discussion about dual contraceptive with partner (OR = 4.27 95% CI:1.69-10.77), provision of counselling on dual contraceptives by health care provider (OR = 4.47,95% CI:3.81-5.24) and CD4 count > 350 cells/ mm<sup>3</sup> (OR = 3.87,95%CI:3.53-4.23) were among the significant factors associated with dual contraceptive utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall prevalence of dual contraceptive utilization among HIV positive women was significantly low. Disclosure of HIV status, partner involvement in post-test counselling, open discussion about dual contraceptive with partner, counselling on dual contraceptive by health care provider and CD4 count > 350 cells/ mm<sup>3</sup> were positively affect dual contraceptive utilization. This study implies the need to develop plans and policies to improve partner involvement posttest counseling, integrate the counseling and provision of dual contraceptive at ART clinic at each level of health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":10637,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40834-021-00161-w","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-021-00161-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Dual contraceptive is the use of a barrier like condom along with any modern contraceptive methods which has double significance for the prevention STI including HIV and unintended pregnancy. The prevalence and determinants of dual contraceptive utilization described by different studies were highly inconsistent in Ethiopia. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence and determinants of dual contraceptive utilization among HIV positive women in Ethiopia.

Methods: International database mainly Pub Med, Google scholar, HINARI, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, AJOL was applied to identify original studies. STATA software version 14 was applied to analyze the pooled prevalence of dual contraceptive. I2 test statistics was computed to check the presence of heterogeneity across the studies and eggers test was used to identify publication bias. The pooled prevalence of dual contraceptive utilization was estimated by using a random effects model. The associations between determinants and dual contraceptive utilization were evaluated by using both random and fixed effect models.

Result: A total 9 studies with 9168 HIV positive women were enrolled in this study. The pooled prevalence of dual contraceptive utilization among HIV positive women in Ethiopia was 26.14% (95% CI 21.20-31.08). Disclosure of HIV status (OR = 4.18,95%CI:2.26-7.72), partner involvement in post-test counselling (OR = 2.31,95%CI:1.63-3.25), open discussion about dual contraceptive with partner (OR = 4.27 95% CI:1.69-10.77), provision of counselling on dual contraceptives by health care provider (OR = 4.47,95% CI:3.81-5.24) and CD4 count > 350 cells/ mm3 (OR = 3.87,95%CI:3.53-4.23) were among the significant factors associated with dual contraceptive utilization.

Conclusion: The overall prevalence of dual contraceptive utilization among HIV positive women was significantly low. Disclosure of HIV status, partner involvement in post-test counselling, open discussion about dual contraceptive with partner, counselling on dual contraceptive by health care provider and CD4 count > 350 cells/ mm3 were positively affect dual contraceptive utilization. This study implies the need to develop plans and policies to improve partner involvement posttest counseling, integrate the counseling and provision of dual contraceptive at ART clinic at each level of health system.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚艾滋病毒阳性妇女的双重避孕使用和决定因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析,2020。
背景:双重避孕是指使用避孕套等屏障以及任何现代避孕方法,对预防包括艾滋病毒和意外怀孕在内的性传播感染具有双重意义。在埃塞俄比亚,不同的研究描述的双重避孕使用的流行率和决定因素是高度不一致的。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在估计埃塞俄比亚艾滋病毒阳性妇女中双重避孕药具使用的总流行率和决定因素。方法:采用Pub Med、Google scholar、HINARI、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、AJOL等国际数据库对原始研究进行检索。采用STATA软件第14版对双重避孕的汇总流行情况进行分析。计算I2检验统计量以检查研究之间是否存在异质性,并使用eggers检验来确定发表偏倚。采用随机效应模型估计双重避孕药具使用率。采用随机效应模型和固定效应模型评估了决定因素与双重避孕药使用之间的关系。结果:本研究共纳入9项研究,9168名HIV阳性妇女。埃塞俄比亚艾滋病毒阳性妇女使用双重避孕药具的总流行率为26.14% (95% CI 21.20-31.08)。披露的艾滋病毒状况(或= 4.18,95%置信区间CI: 2.26 - -7.72),合作伙伴参与检测后咨询(或= 2.31,95% CI: 1.63—-3.25),开放讨论双重避孕与伴侣(或= 4.27 95%置信区间:1.69—-10.77),由卫生保健提供者提供的避孕咨询在双重(或= 4.47,95% CI: 3.81—-5.24)和CD4细胞计数> 350 / mm3(或= 3.87,95% CI: 3.53—-4.23)等相关的重要因素双重避孕使用率。结论:HIV阳性妇女双重避孕药具使用率总体较低。披露艾滋病毒状况、伴侣参与检测后咨询、与伴侣公开讨论双重避孕、卫生保健提供者提供双重避孕咨询以及CD4细胞计数> 350细胞/ mm3对双重避孕药具的使用有积极影响。本研究表明,需要制定计划和政策,以改善伴侣参与测试后咨询,整合咨询和提供双重避孕在各级卫生系统的抗逆转录病毒治疗诊所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Unintended pregnancy and contraceptive use among women in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis Male characteristics and contraception in four districts of the central region, Ghana. Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey. Assessing the sustainability of two independent voucher-based family planning programs in Pakistan: a 24-months post-intervention evaluation. Emergency contraceptive use of Metronidazole among University female students in Dodoma region of Tanzania: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1