[Evaluation of a user habit-based ophthalmologic e-learning platform].

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Ophthalmologe Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s00347-020-01306-z
Andreas Müller, Franziska Schmidt, Norbert Pfeiffer, Anita Brill, Verena Prokosch
{"title":"[Evaluation of a user habit-based ophthalmologic e-learning platform].","authors":"Andreas Müller,&nbsp;Franziska Schmidt,&nbsp;Norbert Pfeiffer,&nbsp;Anita Brill,&nbsp;Verena Prokosch","doi":"10.1007/s00347-020-01306-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In medical studies digital learning is often achieved by the use of learning management platforms, such as Ilias. Lecture presentations and organizational documents are typical contents. Students use multiple, mostly external learning options for acquisition of knowledge and competences. We present our updated ophthalmology e‑learning environment for medical students and its evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluation of an ophthalmology e‑learning platform for medical students, which considers prevalent learning habits.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The platform should provide and link a selection of internal and external learning resources following anatomical structures of the eye. For every subject area the platform provides a text with essential matters, clinical cases, lecture presentations, multiple choice questions for practice, links to corresponding chapters of a textbook and the appropriate AMBOSS learning cards (Amboss GmbH, Berlin, Germany). At the end of the semester an evaluation of the platform was carried out. Different statements were rated by the students on ordinal scales and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The platform was rated with 1.47 ± 0.54 (mean ± standard deviation; n = 107) on a German school grade scale (1 = best, 6 = worst). It was perceived as helpful for the individual learning with 1.62 ± 0.77 (1 = very helpful, 7 = not helpful at all). The structuring of the internal and external learning resources was rated as very good 1.44 ± 0.66 (1 = very good, 7 = very bad). The median for subjective amount of usage was 1-5 h (ordinal scale <1, 1-5, 6-10, 15-20, >20 h).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It appears to be meaningful to specifically link external learning resources corresponding to the own curricular structure in order to provide medical students with a modern basis for learning in ophthalmology.</p>","PeriodicalId":54676,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologe","volume":" ","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00347-020-01306-z","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologe","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-020-01306-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: In medical studies digital learning is often achieved by the use of learning management platforms, such as Ilias. Lecture presentations and organizational documents are typical contents. Students use multiple, mostly external learning options for acquisition of knowledge and competences. We present our updated ophthalmology e‑learning environment for medical students and its evaluation.

Objective: Evaluation of an ophthalmology e‑learning platform for medical students, which considers prevalent learning habits.

Material and methods: The platform should provide and link a selection of internal and external learning resources following anatomical structures of the eye. For every subject area the platform provides a text with essential matters, clinical cases, lecture presentations, multiple choice questions for practice, links to corresponding chapters of a textbook and the appropriate AMBOSS learning cards (Amboss GmbH, Berlin, Germany). At the end of the semester an evaluation of the platform was carried out. Different statements were rated by the students on ordinal scales and analyzed.

Results: The platform was rated with 1.47 ± 0.54 (mean ± standard deviation; n = 107) on a German school grade scale (1 = best, 6 = worst). It was perceived as helpful for the individual learning with 1.62 ± 0.77 (1 = very helpful, 7 = not helpful at all). The structuring of the internal and external learning resources was rated as very good 1.44 ± 0.66 (1 = very good, 7 = very bad). The median for subjective amount of usage was 1-5 h (ordinal scale <1, 1-5, 6-10, 15-20, >20 h).

Conclusion: It appears to be meaningful to specifically link external learning resources corresponding to the own curricular structure in order to provide medical students with a modern basis for learning in ophthalmology.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[基于用户习惯的眼科电子学习平台评价]。
背景:在医学研究中,数字化学习通常是通过使用学习管理平台来实现的,比如Ilias。讲座演示和组织文件是典型的内容。学生使用多种,主要是外部学习选择来获取知识和能力。我们为医学生提供最新的眼科学电子学习环境及其评价。目的:评价考虑普遍学习习惯的医学生眼科学电子学习平台。材料和方法:平台应提供并链接一系列遵循眼睛解剖结构的内部和外部学习资源。对于每个学科领域,该平台都提供了基本事项、临床病例、演讲报告、练习选择题、教科书相应章节的链接和相应的AMBOSS学习卡(AMBOSS GmbH,柏林,德国)。学期结束时,对平台进行了评估。学生们用顺序量表对不同的陈述进行评分并进行分析。结果:平台评分为1.47 ±0.54(平均 ±标准差;n = 107)(1 =最好,6 =最差)。对个体学习有帮助(1.62 ±0.77)(1 =非常有帮助,7 =完全没有帮助)。内外部学习资源的结构评价为非常好(1.44 ±0.66)(1 =非常好,7 =非常差)。主观使用量的中位数为1-5 h(有序量表为20 h)。结论:为医学生提供现代化的眼科学学习基础,有针对性地对接与自身课程结构相适应的外部学习资源具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
[Improved profitability and indications for blood culture extraction in emergency departments: another step forward].
IF 1.9 4区 医学Revista Espanola De QuimioterapiaPub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.37201/req/075.2022
I Nieto Rojas, W E López Forero
来源期刊
Ophthalmologe
Ophthalmologe 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Ophthalmologe is an internationally recognized journal dealing with all aspects of ophthalmology. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of ophthalmologists. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Mediated Optic Neuritis Following COVID-19 Vaccination. [Acute unilateral impaired vision after COVID vaccination]. [Epidemiology and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. The Hannover data in the Retina.net ROP registry from 2001-2017]. [Displacement of a STARflo glaucoma drainage implant with accompanying complications]. [Complete visual recovery after Nd:YAG laser polishing of the anterior surface of the intraocular lens].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1