Decision making and the bedside assessment: The Speech Language Therapists' thinking when making a diagnosis at the bed.

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.4102/sajcd.v68i1.790
Kim Coutts, Mershen Pillay
{"title":"Decision making and the bedside assessment: The Speech Language Therapists' thinking when making a diagnosis at the bed.","authors":"Kim Coutts,&nbsp;Mershen Pillay","doi":"10.4102/sajcd.v68i1.790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The bedside assessment is often seen as a screener because of its high variability in sensitivity and specificity, whilst the instrumental measures are viewed as gold standards because of the ability of speech-language therapist (SLT) to visualise the swallow more objectively.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This research article explores how the value needs to be placed on the decision-making abilities of the SLT rather than on the assessment measure itself.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed methodology concurrent triangulation design was employed to collect data in two phases: the first phase included observing seven SLTs conducting assessments using a standardised bedside measure together with pulse oximetry and cervical auscultation. The second phase was a focus group discussion based on the findings from the first phase. Data were analysed thematically using a bottom-up approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following factors were found to influence the decision-making process at the bedside: bedside assessment data sets, patient, multidisciplinary team, context and then SLT. The availability of more data from the assessment from different data sets improved the confidence of the SLT at the bedside when needing to make clinical decisions. Clinical instincts are developed through experience and observation of those more experienced. These skills need to be developed from junior years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research study showed that a bedside assessment can provide valuable information that will allow for diagnostic decisions to be made at the bedside. This study also highlighted the importance of critical thinking using clinical instincts, and that these are the factors that need to be valued and emphasised rather than the assessment measures themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":44003,"journal":{"name":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","volume":"68 1","pages":"e1-e8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252154/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v68i1.790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The bedside assessment is often seen as a screener because of its high variability in sensitivity and specificity, whilst the instrumental measures are viewed as gold standards because of the ability of speech-language therapist (SLT) to visualise the swallow more objectively.

Objectives: This research article explores how the value needs to be placed on the decision-making abilities of the SLT rather than on the assessment measure itself.

Method: A mixed methodology concurrent triangulation design was employed to collect data in two phases: the first phase included observing seven SLTs conducting assessments using a standardised bedside measure together with pulse oximetry and cervical auscultation. The second phase was a focus group discussion based on the findings from the first phase. Data were analysed thematically using a bottom-up approach.

Results: The following factors were found to influence the decision-making process at the bedside: bedside assessment data sets, patient, multidisciplinary team, context and then SLT. The availability of more data from the assessment from different data sets improved the confidence of the SLT at the bedside when needing to make clinical decisions. Clinical instincts are developed through experience and observation of those more experienced. These skills need to be developed from junior years.

Conclusion: This research study showed that a bedside assessment can provide valuable information that will allow for diagnostic decisions to be made at the bedside. This study also highlighted the importance of critical thinking using clinical instincts, and that these are the factors that need to be valued and emphasised rather than the assessment measures themselves.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决策与床边评估:言语语言治疗师在床上诊断时的思考。
背景:床边评估通常被视为筛查,因为它在敏感性和特异性方面具有高度可变性,而工具测量被视为金标准,因为言语语言治疗师(SLT)能够更客观地观察吞咽。目的:本研究探讨了如何将价值放在SLT的决策能力上,而不是放在评估措施本身上。方法:采用混合方法学并行三角测量设计,分两阶段收集数据:第一阶段包括观察7名slt,使用标准化床边测量、脉搏血氧仪和宫颈听诊进行评估。第二阶段是在第一阶段调查结果的基础上进行焦点小组讨论。采用自下而上的方法对数据进行了主题分析。结果:影响床边决策过程的因素依次为床边评估数据集、患者、多学科团队、情境和SLT。来自不同数据集的更多评估数据的可用性提高了床边SLT在需要做出临床决策时的信心。临床直觉是通过经验和对更有经验的人的观察而形成的。这些技能需要从大三开始培养。结论:这项研究表明,床边评估可以提供有价值的信息,这将允许在床边做出诊断决定。这项研究还强调了运用临床直觉进行批判性思维的重要性,这些才是需要重视和强调的因素,而不是评估措施本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
36.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Community-based infant hearing screening: Outcomes of a rural pilot programme. Communication Intervention in South Africa: Advocating for the Listening and Spoken Language Approach. Brainstem auditory evoked responses: Objective hearing threshold assessment in Holstein cows. The outcomes of an audiological management programme for neonates with hyperbilirubinaemia. Awareness of middle ear pathologies in South Africa: Towards a primordial preventive audiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1