Diagnostic Performance of Muscle Echo Intensity and Fractal Dimension for the Detection of Frailty Phenotype.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS Ultrasonic Imaging Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-08 DOI:10.1177/01617346211029656
Rebeca Mirón Mombiela, Jelena Vucetic, Paloma Monllor, Jenny S Cárdenas-Herrán, Paloma Taltavull de La Paz, Consuelo Borrás
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Muscle Echo Intensity and Fractal Dimension for the Detection of Frailty Phenotype.","authors":"Rebeca Mirón Mombiela,&nbsp;Jelena Vucetic,&nbsp;Paloma Monllor,&nbsp;Jenny S Cárdenas-Herrán,&nbsp;Paloma Taltavull de La Paz,&nbsp;Consuelo Borrás","doi":"10.1177/01617346211029656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the relationship between muscle echo intensity (EI) and fractal dimension (FD), and the diagnostic performance of both ultrasound parameters for the identification of frailty phenotype. A retrospective interpretation of ultrasound scans from a previous cohort (November 2014-February 2015) was performed. The sample included healthy participants <60 years old, and participants ≥60 divided into robust, pre-frail, and frail groups according to Fried frailty criteria. A region of interest of the rectus femoris from the ultrasound scan was segmented, and histogram function was applied to obtain EI. For fractal analysis, images were processed using two-dimensional box-counting techniques to calculate FD. Statistical analyses were performed with diagnostic performance tests. A total of 102 participants (mean age 63 ± 16, 57 men) were evaluated. Muscle fractal dimension correlated with EI (<i>r</i> = .38, <i>p</i> < .01) and showed different pattern in the scatter plots when participants were grouped by non-frail (control + robust) and frail (pre-frail + frail). The diagnostic accuracy for EI to categorize frailty was of 0.69 (95%CI: 0.59-0.78, <i>p</i> = .001), with high intra-rater (ICC: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.98-0.99); <i>p</i> < .001) and inter-rater (ICC: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.75-0.95; <i>p</i> < .001) reliability and low measurement error for both parameters (EI: -0.18, LOA95%: -10.8 to 10.5; FD: 0.00, LOA95%: -0.09 to 0.10) in arbitrary units. The ROC curve combining both parameters was not better than EI alone (<i>p</i> = .18). Muscle FD correlated with EI and showed different patterns according to frailty phenotype, with EI outperforming FD as a possible diagnostic tool for frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":49401,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasonic Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01617346211029656","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasonic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01617346211029656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

To determine the relationship between muscle echo intensity (EI) and fractal dimension (FD), and the diagnostic performance of both ultrasound parameters for the identification of frailty phenotype. A retrospective interpretation of ultrasound scans from a previous cohort (November 2014-February 2015) was performed. The sample included healthy participants <60 years old, and participants ≥60 divided into robust, pre-frail, and frail groups according to Fried frailty criteria. A region of interest of the rectus femoris from the ultrasound scan was segmented, and histogram function was applied to obtain EI. For fractal analysis, images were processed using two-dimensional box-counting techniques to calculate FD. Statistical analyses were performed with diagnostic performance tests. A total of 102 participants (mean age 63 ± 16, 57 men) were evaluated. Muscle fractal dimension correlated with EI (r = .38, p < .01) and showed different pattern in the scatter plots when participants were grouped by non-frail (control + robust) and frail (pre-frail + frail). The diagnostic accuracy for EI to categorize frailty was of 0.69 (95%CI: 0.59-0.78, p = .001), with high intra-rater (ICC: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.98-0.99); p < .001) and inter-rater (ICC: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.75-0.95; p < .001) reliability and low measurement error for both parameters (EI: -0.18, LOA95%: -10.8 to 10.5; FD: 0.00, LOA95%: -0.09 to 0.10) in arbitrary units. The ROC curve combining both parameters was not better than EI alone (p = .18). Muscle FD correlated with EI and showed different patterns according to frailty phenotype, with EI outperforming FD as a possible diagnostic tool for frailty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌肉回声强度和分形维数检测脆性表型的诊断价值。
探讨肌肉回声强度(EI)与分形维数(FD)之间的关系,以及两种超声参数对虚弱表型鉴别的诊断价值。对先前队列(2014年11月- 2015年2月)的超声扫描结果进行回顾性分析。样本包括健康参与者r =。38, p p = .001),具有较高的内比值(ICC: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.98-0.99);p p p = .18)。肌肉FD与EI相关,并根据虚弱表型表现出不同的模式,EI优于FD作为虚弱的可能诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasonic Imaging
Ultrasonic Imaging 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasonic Imaging provides rapid publication for original and exceptional papers concerned with the development and application of ultrasonic-imaging technology. Ultrasonic Imaging publishes articles in the following areas: theoretical and experimental aspects of advanced methods and instrumentation for imaging
期刊最新文献
Development of a Polymer Ultrasound Contrast Agent Incorporating Nested Carbon Nanodots. Automated Deep Learning-Based Finger Joint Segmentation in 3-D Ultrasound Images With Limited Dataset. CBAM-RIUnet: Breast Tumor Segmentation With Enhanced Breast Ultrasound and Test-Time Augmentation Deep learning Radiomics Based on Two-Dimensional Ultrasound for Predicting the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer SPGAN Optimized by Piranha Foraging Optimization for Thyroid Nodule Classification in Ultrasound Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1