Impact of national valsartan recalls on Veterans' outcomes.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2021-06-24 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986211016173
Paige L Morizio, Sara R Britnell, Andreina A Ottman
{"title":"Impact of national valsartan recalls on Veterans' outcomes.","authors":"Paige L Morizio,&nbsp;Sara R Britnell,&nbsp;Andreina A Ottman","doi":"10.1177/20420986211016173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Chemical impurities discovered in angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) products in late 2018-2019 resulted in recalls of various products and has likely had downstream effects for patients and prescribers. The purpose of this study is to determine how the valsartan recall impacted clinical endpoints and prescribing of antihypertensives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study including patients receiving recalled valsartan with essential hypertension who were mailed a recall letter on 12 March 2019. Mean blood pressure endpoints were collected 6 months before (pre-recall) and after the recall letter was mailed (post-recall). Antihypertensive medication changes and titrations were also characterized post-recall.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 300 patients meeting eligibility criteria were included. There was no statistically significant difference in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) when pre- and post-recall blood pressures were compared (SBP: 137.2 mmHg <i>versus</i> 135.8 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.125; DBP: 78.6 mmHg <i>versus</i> 78.5 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.900). In addition, the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure readings was similar in the pre- and post-recall timeframes (28% <i>versus</i> 27%, <i>p</i> = 0.72). A total of 33 medication changes involving valsartan occurred, with approximately one-third being changed to another ARB (<i>n</i> = 11) or drug class (<i>n</i> = 12). In total, 11 valsartan medication changes were specifically documented to be related to the valsartan recall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicate the valsartan recalls that occurred in 2019 did not significantly impact the clinical outcomes of the studied population.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Impact of a medication recall on Veterans' outcomes<b>Background::</b> Chemical impurities discovered in a class of blood pressure medications known as angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) occurred in late 2018-2019. This resulted in recalls of various products and has likely had downstream effects for patients and prescribers.<b>Objective::</b> The purpose of this study is to determine how the recall of valsartan, which is a medication in the ARB class, impacted clinical endpoints and prescribing of medications for blood pressure.<b>Methods::</b> This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study including patients receiving recalled valsartan with high blood pressure who were mailed a recall letter on 12 March 2019. Blood pressure endpoints were collected 6 months before (pre-recall) and after the recall letter was mailed (post-recall). Medication changes and titrations were also characterized post-recall.<b>Results::</b> Three hundred patients meeting eligibility criteria were included. There was no difference found in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) when pre- and post-recall blood pressures were compared (SBP: 137.2 mmHg <i>versus</i> 135.8 mmHg; DBP: 78.6 mmHg <i>versus</i> 78.5 mmHg). In addition, the percent of patients with controlled blood pressure readings was similar in the pre- and post-recall timeframes (28% <i>versus</i> 27%). A total of 33 medication changes involving valsartan occurred, with approximately one-third being changed to another ARB (<i>n</i> = 11) or drug class (<i>n</i> = 12). Eleven valsartan medication changes were specifically documented to be related to the valsartan recall.<b>Conclusions::</b> The results of this study indicate the valsartan recalls that occurred in 2019 did not significantly impact the clinical outcomes of the studied population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"12 ","pages":"20420986211016173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20420986211016173","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986211016173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and aims: Chemical impurities discovered in angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) products in late 2018-2019 resulted in recalls of various products and has likely had downstream effects for patients and prescribers. The purpose of this study is to determine how the valsartan recall impacted clinical endpoints and prescribing of antihypertensives.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study including patients receiving recalled valsartan with essential hypertension who were mailed a recall letter on 12 March 2019. Mean blood pressure endpoints were collected 6 months before (pre-recall) and after the recall letter was mailed (post-recall). Antihypertensive medication changes and titrations were also characterized post-recall.

Results: A total of 300 patients meeting eligibility criteria were included. There was no statistically significant difference in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) when pre- and post-recall blood pressures were compared (SBP: 137.2 mmHg versus 135.8 mmHg, p = 0.125; DBP: 78.6 mmHg versus 78.5 mmHg, p = 0.900). In addition, the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure readings was similar in the pre- and post-recall timeframes (28% versus 27%, p = 0.72). A total of 33 medication changes involving valsartan occurred, with approximately one-third being changed to another ARB (n = 11) or drug class (n = 12). In total, 11 valsartan medication changes were specifically documented to be related to the valsartan recall.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate the valsartan recalls that occurred in 2019 did not significantly impact the clinical outcomes of the studied population.

Plain language summary: Impact of a medication recall on Veterans' outcomesBackground:: Chemical impurities discovered in a class of blood pressure medications known as angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) occurred in late 2018-2019. This resulted in recalls of various products and has likely had downstream effects for patients and prescribers.Objective:: The purpose of this study is to determine how the recall of valsartan, which is a medication in the ARB class, impacted clinical endpoints and prescribing of medications for blood pressure.Methods:: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study including patients receiving recalled valsartan with high blood pressure who were mailed a recall letter on 12 March 2019. Blood pressure endpoints were collected 6 months before (pre-recall) and after the recall letter was mailed (post-recall). Medication changes and titrations were also characterized post-recall.Results:: Three hundred patients meeting eligibility criteria were included. There was no difference found in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) when pre- and post-recall blood pressures were compared (SBP: 137.2 mmHg versus 135.8 mmHg; DBP: 78.6 mmHg versus 78.5 mmHg). In addition, the percent of patients with controlled blood pressure readings was similar in the pre- and post-recall timeframes (28% versus 27%). A total of 33 medication changes involving valsartan occurred, with approximately one-third being changed to another ARB (n = 11) or drug class (n = 12). Eleven valsartan medication changes were specifically documented to be related to the valsartan recall.Conclusions:: The results of this study indicate the valsartan recalls that occurred in 2019 did not significantly impact the clinical outcomes of the studied population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全国缬沙坦召回对退伍军人结果的影响。
背景和目的:2018年底至2019年在血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)产品中发现的化学杂质导致各种产品被召回,并可能对患者和处方者产生下游影响。本研究的目的是确定缬沙坦召回对临床终点和抗高血压药物处方的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性、单中心、队列研究,纳入了2019年3月12日收到召回信的接受召回缬沙坦治疗的原发性高血压患者。收集召回前6个月(召回前)和召回后6个月(召回后)的平均血压终点。召回后抗高血压药物的变化和滴定也有特征。结果:共纳入300例符合入选标准的患者。当比较回忆前和回忆后的血压时,平均收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)无统计学差异(SBP: 137.2 mmHg vs 135.8 mmHg, p = 0.125;舒张压:78.6 mmHg vs 78.5 mmHg, p = 0.900)。此外,在回忆前后,血压读数得到控制的患者比例相似(28%对27%,p = 0.72)。总共发生了33例涉及缬沙坦的药物改变,其中约三分之一的患者被改为另一种ARB (n = 11)或药物类别(n = 12)。总共有11例缬沙坦药物改变被明确记录为与缬沙坦召回有关。结论:本研究结果表明,2019年发生的缬沙坦召回事件对研究人群的临床结果没有显著影响。背景:2018年底至2019年,在一类被称为血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)的降压药中发现了化学杂质。这导致了各种产品的召回,并可能对患者和处方者产生下游影响。目的:本研究的目的是确定缬沙坦(ARB类药物)的召回对临床终点和降压药处方的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性、单中心、队列研究,纳入了接受召回缬沙坦治疗的高血压患者,这些患者于2019年3月12日收到召回信。分别在召回前(召回前)和召回信寄出后(召回后)6个月采集血压终点。药物变化和滴定也被描述为召回后的特征。结果:300例患者符合入选标准。当比较回忆前和回忆后的血压时,收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)没有差异(SBP: 137.2 mmHg vs 135.8 mmHg;舒张压:78.6 mmHg vs 78.5 mmHg)。此外,在回忆前后,血压读数得到控制的患者比例相似(28%对27%)。总共发生了33例涉及缬沙坦的药物改变,其中约三分之一的患者被改为另一种ARB (n = 11)或药物类别(n = 12)。11种缬沙坦药物变化被特别记录为与缬沙坦召回有关。结论:本研究结果表明,2019年发生的缬沙坦召回事件对研究人群的临床结果没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the impact of a pharmacist intervention on inappropriate prescribing practices at hospital admission and discharge in older patients: a secondary outcome analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Determining the optimum dose of remifentanil in combination with propofol for total intravenous anaesthesia in hysteroscopy under Narcotrend and SPI monitoring. The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance department in the pharmaceutical industry: results of an Italian national survey. Comparison of a single intravenous infusion of alfentanil or sufentanil combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol for daytime hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial. Governance of artificial intelligence and machine learning in pharmacovigilance: what works today and what more is needed?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1