Gender Differences in Depression in the General Population of Indonesia: Confounding Effects.

Q1 Psychology Depression Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2021-06-24 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/3162445
Andi Agus Mumang, Saidah Syamsuddin, Ida Leida Maria, Irawan Yusuf
{"title":"Gender Differences in Depression in the General Population of Indonesia: Confounding Effects.","authors":"Andi Agus Mumang,&nbsp;Saidah Syamsuddin,&nbsp;Ida Leida Maria,&nbsp;Irawan Yusuf","doi":"10.1155/2021/3162445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research findings on gender differences in depression are inconsistent. This study investigated gender and depression in the Indonesian population and considered possible confounding effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study. Participants completed the following self-report measures: demographic characteristic questions, the Cultural Orientation Scale, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Gender differences in depression were examined using a generalized linear model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After withdrawals, 265 men and 243 women remained. Women and men did not differ in overall scores and four-factor depression symptoms even after adjusting for cultural orientation and demographic confounding factors, except for the depression symptoms \"crying,\" \"cannot get going,\" and \"people were unfriendly.\" Gender differences in depression became significant after adjusting for stereotypical symptom variance. Men reported being lonelier than women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Possible confounding effects on the association between gender and depression are methodological issues, cultural orientation transition, and stereotypical symptoms. Low depression scores found for gender may reflect <i>dimension-counterpart coping strategies</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":38441,"journal":{"name":"Depression Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253638/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3162445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Research findings on gender differences in depression are inconsistent. This study investigated gender and depression in the Indonesian population and considered possible confounding effects.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Participants completed the following self-report measures: demographic characteristic questions, the Cultural Orientation Scale, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Gender differences in depression were examined using a generalized linear model.

Results: After withdrawals, 265 men and 243 women remained. Women and men did not differ in overall scores and four-factor depression symptoms even after adjusting for cultural orientation and demographic confounding factors, except for the depression symptoms "crying," "cannot get going," and "people were unfriendly." Gender differences in depression became significant after adjusting for stereotypical symptom variance. Men reported being lonelier than women.

Conclusions: Possible confounding effects on the association between gender and depression are methodological issues, cultural orientation transition, and stereotypical symptoms. Low depression scores found for gender may reflect dimension-counterpart coping strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚普通人群中抑郁症的性别差异:混杂效应。
背景:抑郁症的性别差异研究结果并不一致。本研究调查了印度尼西亚人口中的性别和抑郁症,并考虑了可能的混杂效应。方法:采用横断面研究。参与者完成了以下自我报告测量:人口统计学特征问题、文化取向量表和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表。使用广义线性模型检查抑郁症的性别差异。结果:停药后,男性265例,女性243例。即使在调整了文化取向和人口混杂因素后,女性和男性在总体得分和四因素抑郁症状上也没有差异,除了抑郁症状“哭泣”、“无法行动”和“人们不友好”。在调整刻板印象症状方差后,抑郁的性别差异变得显著。男性比女性更孤独。结论:性别与抑郁之间关系的可能混淆因素是方法学问题、文化取向转变和刻板印象症状。性别抑郁得分低可能反映了维度对应的应对策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Depression Research and Treatment
Depression Research and Treatment Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety and Its Association with Sleep Quality in the First-Year Medical Science Students Common Mental Disorder and Associated Factors among Women Attending Antenatal Care Follow-Up in North Wollo Public Health Facilities, Amhara Region, Northeast Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study Gratitude and Religiosity in Psychiatric Inpatients with Depression. Developing a Depression Care Model for the Hill Tribes: A Family- and Community-Based Participatory Research. Network Structure of Comorbidity Patterns in U.S. Adults with Depression: A National Study Based on Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1