Intranasal Corticosteroids: Patient Administration Angles and Impact of Education.

Rhinology online Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-08 DOI:10.4193/rhinol/20.070
Sara Treat, Charles S Ebert, Zainab Farzal, Saikat Basu, Adam M Zanation, Brian D Thorp, Julia S Kimbell, Brent A Senior, Adam J Kimple
{"title":"Intranasal Corticosteroids: Patient Administration Angles and Impact of Education.","authors":"Sara Treat,&nbsp;Charles S Ebert,&nbsp;Zainab Farzal,&nbsp;Saikat Basu,&nbsp;Adam M Zanation,&nbsp;Brian D Thorp,&nbsp;Julia S Kimbell,&nbsp;Brent A Senior,&nbsp;Adam J Kimple","doi":"10.4193/rhinol/20.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intranasal corticosteroids sprays (INCS) are first line treatment for allergic rhinitis and are frequently used for chronic rhinosinusitis. Improperly aiming INCS increases the risk of epistaxis and may decrease the efficacy of the medication. The goal of this study was to determine how patients position INCS for drug delivery and if verbal or written instructions improve their positioning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients in rhinology clinics were photographed while administering a generic spray bottle. The angle of the spray bottle relative to the patients' head and a fixed background was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 participants were included. The average spray angle for the right naris was 10.1° towards the septum and 67.2° below the Frankfurt Horizontal plane. The average spray angle for the left naris was 4.5° towards the septum and 62.2° below the Frankfurt horizontal plane. The angle of the spray bottle ranged from 50° toward the septum to 43° away from the septum. Only 8 patients aimed away from the septum for both nares. Patients who recalled receiving verbal and written instructions aimed the INCS bottle at the lateral wall and inferior turbinate in contrast to patients who only received one form of instruction or no instructions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients (83%) incorrectly aim INCS when compared to current guidelines. There was statistically significant improvement in the positioning of patients who reported receiving both verbal and written instruction; however, this study highlights a greater need for patient education.</p>","PeriodicalId":74737,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology online","volume":"3 ","pages":"160-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276915/pdf/nihms-1675049.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/rhinol/20.070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Intranasal corticosteroids sprays (INCS) are first line treatment for allergic rhinitis and are frequently used for chronic rhinosinusitis. Improperly aiming INCS increases the risk of epistaxis and may decrease the efficacy of the medication. The goal of this study was to determine how patients position INCS for drug delivery and if verbal or written instructions improve their positioning.

Methods: Patients in rhinology clinics were photographed while administering a generic spray bottle. The angle of the spray bottle relative to the patients' head and a fixed background was determined.

Results: A total of 46 participants were included. The average spray angle for the right naris was 10.1° towards the septum and 67.2° below the Frankfurt Horizontal plane. The average spray angle for the left naris was 4.5° towards the septum and 62.2° below the Frankfurt horizontal plane. The angle of the spray bottle ranged from 50° toward the septum to 43° away from the septum. Only 8 patients aimed away from the septum for both nares. Patients who recalled receiving verbal and written instructions aimed the INCS bottle at the lateral wall and inferior turbinate in contrast to patients who only received one form of instruction or no instructions.

Conclusions: Most patients (83%) incorrectly aim INCS when compared to current guidelines. There was statistically significant improvement in the positioning of patients who reported receiving both verbal and written instruction; however, this study highlights a greater need for patient education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻内皮质类固醇:患者给药角度和教育的影响。
鼻内皮质类固醇喷雾剂(INCS)是过敏性鼻炎的一线治疗方法,经常用于慢性鼻窦炎。不正确地瞄准INCS会增加鼻出血的风险,并可能降低药物的疗效。本研究的目的是确定患者在给药时如何定位INCS,以及口头或书面指示是否能改善其定位。方法:鼻科门诊患者在使用通用喷雾瓶时拍照。确定喷雾瓶相对于患者头部和固定背景的角度。结果:共纳入46例受试者。右鼻孔的平均喷淋角朝向鼻中隔10.1°,法兰克福水平面下方67.2°。左鼻中隔的平均喷射角度为4.5°,法兰克福水平面以下为62.2°。喷雾瓶的角度从离鼻中隔50°到离鼻中隔43°不等。只有8例患者双鼻均远离鼻中隔。与只接受一种指导或没有接受指导的患者相比,接受口头和书面指导的患者将INCS瓶对准外侧壁和下鼻甲。结论:与现行指南相比,大多数患者(83%)不正确地瞄准INCS。同时接受口头和书面指导的患者在定位上有统计学上的显著改善;然而,这项研究强调了对患者教育的更大需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 control protocol for rhinologic surgery Trends in dupilumab persistence among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps Dupilumab as an emerging treatment for refractory allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: a case series and literature review Capturing qualitative olfactory dysfunction with PARPHAIT: the parosmia, phantosmia, and anosmia test Prevalence of smell and taste dysfunction in different clinical severity groups of COVID-19 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1