Predictors of the recurrence of surgically removed previous caesarean skin scars at caesarean section: A retrospective cohort study.

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2021-06-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20595131211023388
İhsan Bağlı, Rei Ogawa, Sait Bakır, Cuma Taşın, Ayhan Yıldırım, Ece Öcal, Mustafa Yavuz, Mesut Bala, Gökçe Turan
{"title":"Predictors of the recurrence of surgically removed previous caesarean skin scars at caesarean section: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"İhsan Bağlı, Rei Ogawa, Sait Bakır, Cuma Taşın, Ayhan Yıldırım, Ece Öcal, Mustafa Yavuz, Mesut Bala, Gökçe Turan","doi":"10.1177/20595131211023388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Caesarean skin scars (CSS; hypertrophic scars and keloids) are very stressful for women and treatment strategies vary. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the outcome of surgical excision of CSS during caesarean section (CS). The study aims to determine the rate of recurrence and risk factors of recurrence for surgically removed CSS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study that used STROBE guidelines. Pfannenstiel incisions of 145 patients were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: recurred (group 1, n = 19) and non-recurred group (group 2, n = 126). The groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of recurrence of CSS was 13% in the total cohort (19/145), one of the main outcomes of the study. While emergency CS was performed for 12 patients in group 1 (63%), CS was carried out in 25 patients in group 2 (20%); this difference was significant (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Before surgery, white blood cell and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in group 1 (<i>P</i> = 0.014 and <i>P</i> = 0.023, respectively). There were 11 dark-skinned women (26%; Fitzpatrick type 4) in group 1 and 31 (74%) in group 2. This difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.031). As the other main outcome, emergency CS could be accepted as a risk factor for recurrence in the multivariate regression analysis (<i>P</i> = 0.060; odds ratio = 5.07; 95% confidence interval = 0.93-17.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rate of recurrence of surgically removed previous CSS at CS is promising without adjunct therapy. Emergency CS was found to be a risk factor for recurrence.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong><b>Background</b> Caesarean skin scars (CSS; hypertrophic scars and keloids) are very stressful and are generally itchy and painful for women. Treatment strategies vary. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the outcome of only surgical excision of CSS scars during caesarean section (CS). <b>The issue being explored</b> There are few data in the literature for CSS in the lower abdomen. These scars can be removed during the second or third CS, but the results are not known exactly. <b>How was the work conducted?</b> In our clinic, 145 patients with CSS were given a CS and their scars were removed at the same time. While most of these scars were reported as hypertrophic by pathological examination, some were reported as keloid. At the earliest, one year after surgery, the rate of recurrence was found to be 13%. <b>What we learned from the study</b> Asymptomatic patients who are planning another pregnancy and do not want to receive any other radiotherapy or steroid injection therapy can wait to remove their CSS at the next CS, especially elective CS with or without adjunct therapy. Emergency CS was found to be a risk factor for the recurrence of these scars.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ae/10/10.1177_20595131211023388.PMC8246489.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20595131211023388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Caesarean skin scars (CSS; hypertrophic scars and keloids) are very stressful for women and treatment strategies vary. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the outcome of surgical excision of CSS during caesarean section (CS). The study aims to determine the rate of recurrence and risk factors of recurrence for surgically removed CSS.

Method: This is a retrospective cohort study that used STROBE guidelines. Pfannenstiel incisions of 145 patients were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: recurred (group 1, n = 19) and non-recurred group (group 2, n = 126). The groups were compared.

Results: The rate of recurrence of CSS was 13% in the total cohort (19/145), one of the main outcomes of the study. While emergency CS was performed for 12 patients in group 1 (63%), CS was carried out in 25 patients in group 2 (20%); this difference was significant (P = 0.001). Before surgery, white blood cell and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in group 1 (P = 0.014 and P = 0.023, respectively). There were 11 dark-skinned women (26%; Fitzpatrick type 4) in group 1 and 31 (74%) in group 2. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.031). As the other main outcome, emergency CS could be accepted as a risk factor for recurrence in the multivariate regression analysis (P = 0.060; odds ratio = 5.07; 95% confidence interval = 0.93-17.51).

Conclusion: The rate of recurrence of surgically removed previous CSS at CS is promising without adjunct therapy. Emergency CS was found to be a risk factor for recurrence.

Lay summary: Background Caesarean skin scars (CSS; hypertrophic scars and keloids) are very stressful and are generally itchy and painful for women. Treatment strategies vary. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the outcome of only surgical excision of CSS scars during caesarean section (CS). The issue being explored There are few data in the literature for CSS in the lower abdomen. These scars can be removed during the second or third CS, but the results are not known exactly. How was the work conducted? In our clinic, 145 patients with CSS were given a CS and their scars were removed at the same time. While most of these scars were reported as hypertrophic by pathological examination, some were reported as keloid. At the earliest, one year after surgery, the rate of recurrence was found to be 13%. What we learned from the study Asymptomatic patients who are planning another pregnancy and do not want to receive any other radiotherapy or steroid injection therapy can wait to remove their CSS at the next CS, especially elective CS with or without adjunct therapy. Emergency CS was found to be a risk factor for the recurrence of these scars.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖腹产手术切除的前次剖腹产皮肤疤痕复发的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:剖腹产皮肤疤痕(CSS;增生性疤痕和瘢痕疙瘩)给妇女带来很大压力,治疗策略也各不相同。然而,人们对剖腹产(CS)期间手术切除 CSS 的结果缺乏了解。本研究旨在确定手术切除 CSS 的复发率和复发的风险因素:这是一项采用 STROBE 指南进行的回顾性队列研究。方法:这是一项采用 STROBE 指南的回顾性队列研究,对 145 名患者的 Pfannenstiel 切口进行了评估。患者分为两组:复发组(第 1 组,n = 19)和非复发组(第 2 组,n = 126)。对两组进行比较:结果:CSS 复发率为 13%(19/145),是研究的主要结果之一。第一组中有 12 名患者(63%)进行了急诊 CS,而第二组中有 25 名患者(20%)进行了 CS;这一差异显著(P = 0.001)。手术前,第 1 组的白细胞和中性粒细胞计数明显更高(分别为 P = 0.014 和 P = 0.023)。第一组中有 11 名深色皮肤女性(26%;菲茨帕特里克 4 型),第二组中有 31 名(74%)。在多变量回归分析中,作为另一个主要结果,急诊 CS 可被视为复发的风险因素(P = 0.060;几率比 = 5.07;95% 置信区间 = 0.93-17.51):结论:在没有辅助治疗的情况下,手术切除的既往CSS在CS时的复发率很有希望。总结:背景剖腹产皮肤疤痕(CSS;增生性疤痕和瘢痕疙瘩)给妇女带来了很大的压力,通常会让她们感到瘙痒和疼痛。治疗策略各不相同。然而,对于在剖腹产(CS)过程中仅通过手术切除 CSS 疤痕的效果还缺乏了解。正在探讨的问题 有关下腹部 CSS 的文献资料很少。这些疤痕可以在第二次或第三次剖腹产时切除,但具体效果尚不清楚。工作是如何进行的?在我们的诊所,145 名 CSS 患者接受了 CS,并同时切除了他们的疤痕。这些疤痕中的大多数经病理检查报告为增生性疤痕,但也有一些报告为瘢痕疙瘩。最早在手术后一年,发现复发率为 13%。我们从研究中得到的启示 计划再次怀孕且不想接受任何其他放射治疗或类固醇注射治疗的无症状患者可以等待下一次 CS(尤其是有或没有辅助治疗的择期 CS)时切除 CSS。研究发现,急诊手术是这些疤痕复发的一个危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of oral Calendula officinalis on second-degree burn wound healing. To bleed or not to bleed? Case series and discussion of haemorrhage risk with enzymatic debridement in burn injuries. An evaluation of clinical psychology input into burns multidisciplinary follow-up clinics. The efficacy of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1