Why Is the Electronic Health Record So Challenging for Research and Clinical Care?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Methods of Information in Medicine Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-19 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1731784
John H Holmes, James Beinlich, Mary R Boland, Kathryn H Bowles, Yong Chen, Tessa S Cook, George Demiris, Michael Draugelis, Laura Fluharty, Peter E Gabriel, Robert Grundmeier, C William Hanson, Daniel S Herman, Blanca E Himes, Rebecca A Hubbard, Charles E Kahn, Dokyoon Kim, Ross Koppel, Qi Long, Nebojsa Mirkovic, Jeffrey S Morris, Danielle L Mowery, Marylyn D Ritchie, Ryan Urbanowicz, Jason H Moore
{"title":"Why Is the Electronic Health Record So Challenging for Research and Clinical Care?","authors":"John H Holmes,&nbsp;James Beinlich,&nbsp;Mary R Boland,&nbsp;Kathryn H Bowles,&nbsp;Yong Chen,&nbsp;Tessa S Cook,&nbsp;George Demiris,&nbsp;Michael Draugelis,&nbsp;Laura Fluharty,&nbsp;Peter E Gabriel,&nbsp;Robert Grundmeier,&nbsp;C William Hanson,&nbsp;Daniel S Herman,&nbsp;Blanca E Himes,&nbsp;Rebecca A Hubbard,&nbsp;Charles E Kahn,&nbsp;Dokyoon Kim,&nbsp;Ross Koppel,&nbsp;Qi Long,&nbsp;Nebojsa Mirkovic,&nbsp;Jeffrey S Morris,&nbsp;Danielle L Mowery,&nbsp;Marylyn D Ritchie,&nbsp;Ryan Urbanowicz,&nbsp;Jason H Moore","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1731784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The electronic health record (EHR) has become increasingly ubiquitous. At the same time, health professionals have been turning to this resource for access to data that is needed for the delivery of health care and for clinical research. There is little doubt that the EHR has made both of these functions easier than earlier days when we relied on paper-based clinical records. Coupled with modern database and data warehouse systems, high-speed networks, and the ability to share clinical data with others are large number of challenges that arguably limit the optimal use of the EHR OBJECTIVES:  Our goal was to provide an exhaustive reference for those who use the EHR in clinical and research contexts, but also for health information systems professionals as they design, implement, and maintain EHR systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This study includes a panel of 24 biomedical informatics researchers, information technology professionals, and clinicians, all of whom have extensive experience in design, implementation, and maintenance of EHR systems, or in using the EHR as clinicians or researchers. All members of the panel are affiliated with Penn Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and have experience with a variety of different EHR platforms and systems and how they have evolved over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Each of the authors has shared their knowledge and experience in using the EHR in a suite of 20 short essays, each representing a specific challenge and classified according to a functional hierarchy of interlocking facets such as usability and usefulness, data quality, standards, governance, data integration, clinical care, and clinical research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> We provide here a set of perspectives on the challenges posed by the EHR to clinical and research users.</p>","PeriodicalId":49822,"journal":{"name":"Methods of Information in Medicine","volume":"60 1-02","pages":"32-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295893/pdf/nihms-1819708.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods of Information in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background:  The electronic health record (EHR) has become increasingly ubiquitous. At the same time, health professionals have been turning to this resource for access to data that is needed for the delivery of health care and for clinical research. There is little doubt that the EHR has made both of these functions easier than earlier days when we relied on paper-based clinical records. Coupled with modern database and data warehouse systems, high-speed networks, and the ability to share clinical data with others are large number of challenges that arguably limit the optimal use of the EHR OBJECTIVES:  Our goal was to provide an exhaustive reference for those who use the EHR in clinical and research contexts, but also for health information systems professionals as they design, implement, and maintain EHR systems.

Methods:  This study includes a panel of 24 biomedical informatics researchers, information technology professionals, and clinicians, all of whom have extensive experience in design, implementation, and maintenance of EHR systems, or in using the EHR as clinicians or researchers. All members of the panel are affiliated with Penn Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and have experience with a variety of different EHR platforms and systems and how they have evolved over time.

Results:  Each of the authors has shared their knowledge and experience in using the EHR in a suite of 20 short essays, each representing a specific challenge and classified according to a functional hierarchy of interlocking facets such as usability and usefulness, data quality, standards, governance, data integration, clinical care, and clinical research.

Conclusion:  We provide here a set of perspectives on the challenges posed by the EHR to clinical and research users.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么电子健康记录对研究和临床护理如此具有挑战性?
背景:电子健康记录(EHR)已经变得越来越普遍。与此同时,卫生专业人员一直在利用这一资源获取提供卫生保健和临床研究所需的数据。毫无疑问,电子健康档案使这两种功能比早期我们依赖纸质临床记录的时候更容易。再加上现代数据库和数据仓库系统、高速网络以及与他人共享临床数据的能力,这些挑战可能会限制EHR的最佳使用。目标:我们的目标是为那些在临床和研究环境中使用EHR的人,以及为设计、实施和维护EHR系统的卫生信息系统专业人员提供详尽的参考。方法:本研究包括24名生物医学信息学研究人员、信息技术专业人员和临床医生,他们都在电子病历系统的设计、实施和维护方面有丰富的经验,或者作为临床医生或研究人员使用电子病历。该小组的所有成员都隶属于宾夕法尼亚大学的宾夕法尼亚医学院,他们对各种不同的电子病历平台和系统都有经验,并了解它们是如何随着时间的推移而发展的。结果:每一位作者都在一套20篇短文中分享了他们使用电子病历的知识和经验,每一篇短文都代表了一个特定的挑战,并根据互锁方面的功能层次进行分类,如可用性和有用性、数据质量、标准、治理、数据集成、临床护理和临床研究。结论:我们在这里提供了一组关于电子病历给临床和研究用户带来的挑战的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods of Information in Medicine
Methods of Information in Medicine 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Good medicine and good healthcare demand good information. Since the journal''s founding in 1962, Methods of Information in Medicine has stressed the methodology and scientific fundamentals of organizing, representing and analyzing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. Covering publications in the fields of biomedical and health informatics, medical biometry, and epidemiology, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, reports, opinion papers, editorials, and letters to the editor. From time to time, the journal publishes articles on particular focus themes as part of a journal''s issue.
期刊最新文献
Cross-lingual Natural Language Processing on Limited Annotated Case/Radiology Reports in English and Japanese: Insights from the Real-MedNLP Workshop. Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Contrast Medium Doses for Computed Tomography Angiography Using Optimized Clinical Parameter Sets. Development and Validation of a Natural Language Processing Algorithm to Pseudonymize Documents in the Context of a Clinical Data Warehouse. Deep Learning for Predicting Progression of Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Based on Lateral Knee Radiographs, Demographic Data, and Symptomatic Assessments. Europe's Largest Research Infrastructure for Curated Medical Data Models with Semantic Annotations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1