Efficacy and Safety of Combined Brain Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yin Yang MD , Lei Deng MD , Yufan Yang MD , Tao Zhang MD , Yuqi Wu MD , Luhua Wang MD , Nan Bi MD,PhD
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Combined Brain Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Yin Yang MD , Lei Deng MD , Yufan Yang MD , Tao Zhang MD , Yuqi Wu MD , Luhua Wang MD , Nan Bi MD,PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2021.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recommended to treat advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas brain radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstream therapy for patients with brain metastases (BMs). This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether the combination of brain RT and ICIs would generate a synergistic effect without unacceptable toxicity to treat NSCLC with BMs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Literature searching was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science, and The Cochrane Library up to December 20, 2020. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, forest plots, and publication bias were analyzed using Stata 15.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen studies were included. In the comparison of the brain RT+ICIs arm and brain RT alone arm, the pooled effect size (ES) for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.83; I² = 0; <em>P < .</em>001; n = 4) and grade 3–4 neurological adverse events (AEs) (risk ratio [RR] = 0.91; 95% CI 0.41–2.02; I² = 26.5; <em>P = .</em>809; n = 4) indicated that the brain RT+ICIs model had significantly better systemic efficacy and similar neurological AEs compared with brain RT alone for NSCLC. Concurrent RT+ICIs were identified as the optimal model, which achieved the best efficacy without significantly increased AEs compared with sequential RT+ICIs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Combined ICIs and brain RT exhibited favorable efficacy and acceptable toxicity for NSCLC patients with BMs, among which, the concurrent model might be the optimal option. Our results could guide the design of future randomized controlled trials and clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 95-107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cllc.2021.06.009","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730421001601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recommended to treat advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas brain radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstream therapy for patients with brain metastases (BMs). This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether the combination of brain RT and ICIs would generate a synergistic effect without unacceptable toxicity to treat NSCLC with BMs.
Methods
Literature searching was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science, and The Cochrane Library up to December 20, 2020. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, forest plots, and publication bias were analyzed using Stata 15.0.
Results
Nineteen studies were included. In the comparison of the brain RT+ICIs arm and brain RT alone arm, the pooled effect size (ES) for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.83; I² = 0; P < .001; n = 4) and grade 3–4 neurological adverse events (AEs) (risk ratio [RR] = 0.91; 95% CI 0.41–2.02; I² = 26.5; P = .809; n = 4) indicated that the brain RT+ICIs model had significantly better systemic efficacy and similar neurological AEs compared with brain RT alone for NSCLC. Concurrent RT+ICIs were identified as the optimal model, which achieved the best efficacy without significantly increased AEs compared with sequential RT+ICIs.
Conclusions
Combined ICIs and brain RT exhibited favorable efficacy and acceptable toxicity for NSCLC patients with BMs, among which, the concurrent model might be the optimal option. Our results could guide the design of future randomized controlled trials and clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.