Efficacy and Safety of Combined Brain Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical lung cancer Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2021.06.009
Yin Yang MD , Lei Deng MD , Yufan Yang MD , Tao Zhang MD , Yuqi Wu MD , Luhua Wang MD , Nan Bi MD,PhD
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Combined Brain Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Yin Yang MD ,&nbsp;Lei Deng MD ,&nbsp;Yufan Yang MD ,&nbsp;Tao Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Yuqi Wu MD ,&nbsp;Luhua Wang MD ,&nbsp;Nan Bi MD,PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2021.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recommended to treat advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas brain radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstream therapy for patients with brain metastases (BMs). This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether the combination of brain RT and ICIs would generate a synergistic effect without unacceptable toxicity to treat NSCLC with BMs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Literature searching was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science, and The Cochrane Library up to December 20, 2020. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, forest plots, and publication bias were analyzed using Stata 15.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen studies were included. In the comparison of the brain RT+ICIs arm and brain RT alone arm, the pooled effect size (ES) for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.83; I² = 0; <em>P &lt; .</em>001; n = 4) and grade 3–4 neurological adverse events (AEs) (risk ratio [RR] = 0.91; 95% CI 0.41–2.02; I² = 26.5; <em>P = .</em>809; n = 4) indicated that the brain RT+ICIs model had significantly better systemic efficacy and similar neurological AEs compared with brain RT alone for NSCLC. Concurrent RT+ICIs were identified as the optimal model, which achieved the best efficacy without significantly increased AEs compared with sequential RT+ICIs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Combined ICIs and brain RT exhibited favorable efficacy and acceptable toxicity for NSCLC patients with BMs, among which, the concurrent model might be the optimal option. Our results could guide the design of future randomized controlled trials and clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 95-107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cllc.2021.06.009","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730421001601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recommended to treat advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas brain radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstream therapy for patients with brain metastases (BMs). This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether the combination of brain RT and ICIs would generate a synergistic effect without unacceptable toxicity to treat NSCLC with BMs.

Methods

Literature searching was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science, and The Cochrane Library up to December 20, 2020. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, forest plots, and publication bias were analyzed using Stata 15.0.

Results

Nineteen studies were included. In the comparison of the brain RT+ICIs arm and brain RT alone arm, the pooled effect size (ES) for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.83; I² = 0; P < .001; n = 4) and grade 3–4 neurological adverse events (AEs) (risk ratio [RR] = 0.91; 95% CI 0.41–2.02; I² = 26.5; P = .809; n = 4) indicated that the brain RT+ICIs model had significantly better systemic efficacy and similar neurological AEs compared with brain RT alone for NSCLC. Concurrent RT+ICIs were identified as the optimal model, which achieved the best efficacy without significantly increased AEs compared with sequential RT+ICIs.

Conclusions

Combined ICIs and brain RT exhibited favorable efficacy and acceptable toxicity for NSCLC patients with BMs, among which, the concurrent model might be the optimal option. Our results could guide the design of future randomized controlled trials and clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑放疗和免疫联合治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移的疗效和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)被推荐用于治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),而脑放疗(RT)是脑转移(BMs)患者的主流治疗方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析研究了脑RT和ICIs联合治疗脑转移性非小细胞肺癌是否会产生协同效应而没有不可接受的毒性。方法截至2020年12月20日,在PubMed、Embase、Web Of Science和Cochrane Library中进行文献检索。使用Stata 15.0分析异质性、敏感性分析、森林图和发表偏倚。结果共纳入19项研究。在脑RT+ICIs组和单独脑RT组的比较中,总生存期(OS)的合并效应大小(ES)(风险比[HR] = 0.77;95%置信区间[CI] 0.71-0.83;i²= 0;P & lt;措施;n = 4)和3-4级神经系统不良事件(ae)(风险比[RR] = 0.91;95% ci 0.41-2.02;i²= 26.5;p = .809;n = 4)表明脑RT+ICIs模型治疗NSCLC的全身疗效明显优于单纯脑RT,神经学ae相似。并发RT+ICIs被确定为最佳模型,与连续RT+ICIs相比,其疗效最佳,ae未显着增加。结论ICIs联合脑RT治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者疗效良好,毒性可接受,其中并发模型可能是最佳选择。我们的结果可以指导未来随机对照试验的设计和临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Immunotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Practical Guide of Current Controversies. Imaging Findings Related to Lung Tract Sealant Use in Percutaneous CT-guided Lung Biopsy. Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Mutations Effect On Tumor Doubling Time And Prognosis Of Solid Dominant Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma. POLE Mutation Associated With Microsatellite Instability and High Tumor Mutational Burden Confers Exquisite Sensitivity to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report and Genomic Database Analysis. Elucidating the Role of EGFRL858R in Brain Metastasis Among Patients With Advanced NSCLC Undergoing TKI Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1