Awareness of Stroke Warning Symptoms, Risk Factors, and Response to Acute Stroke in Biswanath District, Assam, India.

Journal of stroke medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-28 DOI:10.1177/2516608520962349
Sima Kurmi, Elezebeth Mathews, Prakash Babu Kodali, K R Thankappan
{"title":"Awareness of Stroke Warning Symptoms, Risk Factors, and Response to Acute Stroke in Biswanath District, Assam, India.","authors":"Sima Kurmi,&nbsp;Elezebeth Mathews,&nbsp;Prakash Babu Kodali,&nbsp;K R Thankappan","doi":"10.1177/2516608520962349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study was undertaken with the following objectives: (a) to find out the awareness of warning symptoms and risk factors of stroke, (b) response to acute stroke, and (c) factors associated with awareness, risk factors, and response to acute stroke among community-dwelling adults in Biswanath district of Assam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a cross-sectional design, a community-based study was done among 340 adults (mean age 38 years, men 55%) selected using multistage cluster sampling. Information on sociodemographic variables, stroke warning symptoms, risk factors, and response to acute stroke was collected using an adapted World Health Organization (WHO) STEPs stroke surveillance tool. Bivariate and logistic regression analysis were done to find out the factors associated with stroke warning symptoms, risk factors, and response to acute stroke. A \"P\" value < .05 was considered for statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Awareness of stroke was significantly higher among males (<i>P</i> < .01), better educated (<i>P</i> < .01), government employees (<i>P</i> < .05), high-income group (<i>P</i> < .01), and those who reported receiving information from a professional source (<i>P</i> < .01) compared to their counterparts. Knowledge of at least one stroke risk factor and providing at least one correct response to acute stroke was higher among males, better educated, government employees, higher income groups, and those who received information from professional source compared to their counterparts (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Awareness of stroke warning symptoms, risk factors, and response to acute stroke needs to be improved focusing on women, low education groups, those working in the nongovernment sector, and low-income groups by health professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":93323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of stroke medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2516608520962349","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of stroke medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2516608520962349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: This study was undertaken with the following objectives: (a) to find out the awareness of warning symptoms and risk factors of stroke, (b) response to acute stroke, and (c) factors associated with awareness, risk factors, and response to acute stroke among community-dwelling adults in Biswanath district of Assam.

Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, a community-based study was done among 340 adults (mean age 38 years, men 55%) selected using multistage cluster sampling. Information on sociodemographic variables, stroke warning symptoms, risk factors, and response to acute stroke was collected using an adapted World Health Organization (WHO) STEPs stroke surveillance tool. Bivariate and logistic regression analysis were done to find out the factors associated with stroke warning symptoms, risk factors, and response to acute stroke. A "P" value < .05 was considered for statistical significance.

Results: Awareness of stroke was significantly higher among males (P < .01), better educated (P < .01), government employees (P < .05), high-income group (P < .01), and those who reported receiving information from a professional source (P < .01) compared to their counterparts. Knowledge of at least one stroke risk factor and providing at least one correct response to acute stroke was higher among males, better educated, government employees, higher income groups, and those who received information from professional source compared to their counterparts (P < .05).

Conclusion: Awareness of stroke warning symptoms, risk factors, and response to acute stroke needs to be improved focusing on women, low education groups, those working in the nongovernment sector, and low-income groups by health professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度阿萨姆邦比斯瓦纳特地区对中风预警症状、危险因素和急性中风反应的认识
本研究的目的如下:(a)了解阿萨姆邦比斯瓦纳特地区社区居民对中风预警症状和危险因素的认识,(b)对急性中风的反应,以及(c)与认识、危险因素和对急性中风的反应相关的因素。方法:采用横断面设计,采用多阶段整群抽样对340名成年人(平均年龄38岁,男性55%)进行社区研究。使用改编的世界卫生组织(WHO) STEPs卒中监测工具收集有关社会人口统计学变量、卒中预警症状、危险因素和对急性卒中反应的信息。通过双变量和logistic回归分析,找出与脑卒中预警症状、危险因素和急性脑卒中反应相关的因素。P < 0.05为有统计学意义。结果:男性(P < 0.01)、受教育程度较高(P < 0.01)、政府工作人员(P < 0.05)、高收入人群(P < 0.01)和接受专业信息来源者(P < 0.01)对卒中的认知明显高于其他人群。男性、受教育程度较高的人、政府雇员、高收入群体和接受专业信息的人对至少一种卒中危险因素的了解程度和对急性卒中至少一种正确反应的程度高于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:卫生专业人员对卒中预警症状、危险因素和急性卒中反应的认识需要提高,重点是妇女、低学历群体、非政府部门工作人员和低收入群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of the Correlation of Pulsatility Index by Transcranial Doppler in the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Cerebral Venous Sinus 
Thrombosis Acute Ischaemic Stroke in a Young Adult in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Report of Post-strangulation Carotid Artery Dissection The Effect of Biological Sex on a County Pre-hospital Stroke Initiative COVID and Vaccine-related Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Expert Consensus on Improving Stroke Care Ecosystem in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1