Bipolar Depression: A Historical Perspective of the Current Concept, with a Focus on Future Research.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Harvard Review of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000309
Diego J Martino, Marina P Valerio
{"title":"Bipolar Depression: A Historical Perspective of the Current Concept, with a Focus on Future Research.","authors":"Diego J Martino,&nbsp;Marina P Valerio","doi":"10.1097/HRP.0000000000000309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The aim of this narrative review is to trace the origin of the concept of bipolar depression and to expose some of its limitations. Bipolar depression is a broad clinical construct including experiences ranging from traditional melancholic and psychotic episodes ascribed to \"manic-depressive insanity,\" to another heterogeneous group of depressive episodes originally described in the context of binary models of unipolar depression (e.g., psychogenic depression, neurotic depression). None of the available empirical evidence suggests, however, that these subsets of \"bipolar\" depression are equivalent in terms of clinical course, disability, family aggregation, and response to treatment, among other relevant diagnostic validators. Therefore, the validity of the current concept of bipolar depression should be a matter of concern. Here, we discuss some of the potential limitations that this broad construct might entail in terms of pathophysiological, clinical, and therapeutic aspects. Finally, we propose a clinical research program for bipolar depression in order to delimit diagnostic entities based on empirical data, with subsequent validation by laboratory or neuroimaging biomarkers. This process will then aid in the development of more specific treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12915,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this narrative review is to trace the origin of the concept of bipolar depression and to expose some of its limitations. Bipolar depression is a broad clinical construct including experiences ranging from traditional melancholic and psychotic episodes ascribed to "manic-depressive insanity," to another heterogeneous group of depressive episodes originally described in the context of binary models of unipolar depression (e.g., psychogenic depression, neurotic depression). None of the available empirical evidence suggests, however, that these subsets of "bipolar" depression are equivalent in terms of clinical course, disability, family aggregation, and response to treatment, among other relevant diagnostic validators. Therefore, the validity of the current concept of bipolar depression should be a matter of concern. Here, we discuss some of the potential limitations that this broad construct might entail in terms of pathophysiological, clinical, and therapeutic aspects. Finally, we propose a clinical research program for bipolar depression in order to delimit diagnostic entities based on empirical data, with subsequent validation by laboratory or neuroimaging biomarkers. This process will then aid in the development of more specific treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双相抑郁症:当前概念的历史视角,关注未来的研究。
摘要:本文旨在追溯双相抑郁症概念的起源,并揭示其局限性。双相抑郁症是一种广泛的临床结构,包括从传统的忧郁症和归因于“躁郁性精神错乱”的精神病发作,到另一种异质性的抑郁症发作,最初是在单极抑郁症的二元模型背景下描述的(例如,心因性抑郁症,神经性抑郁症)。然而,没有现有的经验证据表明,这些“双相”抑郁症的亚群在临床病程、残疾、家庭聚集和对治疗的反应等相关诊断验证因素方面是相同的。因此,当前双相抑郁症概念的有效性应该是一个值得关注的问题。在这里,我们讨论了一些潜在的限制,这种广泛的结构可能需要在病理生理,临床和治疗方面。最后,我们提出了一个双相抑郁症的临床研究计划,以便根据经验数据划分诊断实体,随后通过实验室或神经成像生物标志物进行验证。这一过程将有助于开发更具体的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Harvard Review of Psychiatry is the authoritative source for scholarly reviews and perspectives on important topics in psychiatry. Founded by the Harvard Medical School''s Department of Psychiatry, the Harvard Review of Psychiatry features review papers that summarize and synthesize the key literature in a scholarly and clinically relevant manner. Topics covered include: Schizophrenia and related disorders; Mood disorders; Personality disorders; Substance use disorders; Anxiety; Neuroscience; Psychosocial aspects of psychiatry; Ethics; Psychiatric education; and much more. In addition, a Clinical Challenges section presents a case with discussion from a panel of experts. Brief reviews are presented in topic-specific columns that include Cross-Cultural Psychiatry, History of Psychiatry, Ethics, and others.
期刊最新文献
Emotional Eating in Primary Care: Considerations for Assessment and Management. Lupus on the Mind: A Case of Psychosis in Uncontrolled Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Psychological Assessment for Gender-Affirming Care in Transgender and Nonbinary Youth: The Companionship Model. Announcing the Shelly F. Greenfield MD, MPH Award for Best Manuscript by an Early Career Author. Ketamine in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review: Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1