Safety of ECT in patients receiving an oral anticoagulant.

The Mental Health Clinician Pub Date : 2021-07-16 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.9740/mhc.2021.07.254
Nicolette R Centanni, Wendy Y Craig, Dena L Whitesell, Wesley R Zemrak, Stephanie D Nichols
{"title":"Safety of ECT in patients receiving an oral anticoagulant.","authors":"Nicolette R Centanni,&nbsp;Wendy Y Craig,&nbsp;Dena L Whitesell,&nbsp;Wesley R Zemrak,&nbsp;Stephanie D Nichols","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2021.07.254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study assessed the use, tolerability, and safety of anticoagulation via direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin in medical and psychiatric inpatients receiving ECT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 32 patients who received ECT while on either a direct oral anticoagulant (9) or warfarin (23) and spanned 247 encounters at Maine Medical Center between December 2012 and December 2018. Data are presented descriptively and analyzed using SPSS version 25 and Microsoft Excel version 2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 247 ECT patient encounters, there were few major adverse effects of ECT in this medically complex population. These adverse effects included headache during 4 encounters (1.6%), respiratory distress during 2 encounters (0.8%) and a cardiovascular event during 1 encounter (0.4%). One patient (3.1%) who was receiving concurrent rivaroxaban and venlafaxine experienced gastrointestinal bleeding that was determined to be unrelated to ECT. One patient on fluoxetine and warfarin experienced hemoptysis thought to be secondary to epistaxis. No other major bleeding or clotting event occurred during an ECT session nor for the duration of the hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin appear safe in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation or acute venous thromboembolism who are receiving concomitant ECT. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"11 4","pages":"254-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/24/i2168-9709-11-4-254.PMC8287866.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mental Health Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2021.07.254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: This study assessed the use, tolerability, and safety of anticoagulation via direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin in medical and psychiatric inpatients receiving ECT.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 32 patients who received ECT while on either a direct oral anticoagulant (9) or warfarin (23) and spanned 247 encounters at Maine Medical Center between December 2012 and December 2018. Data are presented descriptively and analyzed using SPSS version 25 and Microsoft Excel version 2016.

Results: Among the 247 ECT patient encounters, there were few major adverse effects of ECT in this medically complex population. These adverse effects included headache during 4 encounters (1.6%), respiratory distress during 2 encounters (0.8%) and a cardiovascular event during 1 encounter (0.4%). One patient (3.1%) who was receiving concurrent rivaroxaban and venlafaxine experienced gastrointestinal bleeding that was determined to be unrelated to ECT. One patient on fluoxetine and warfarin experienced hemoptysis thought to be secondary to epistaxis. No other major bleeding or clotting event occurred during an ECT session nor for the duration of the hospitalization.

Discussion: Direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin appear safe in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation or acute venous thromboembolism who are receiving concomitant ECT. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受口服抗凝剂患者电痉挛治疗的安全性。
本研究评估了内科和精神科住院患者接受电痉挛治疗时直接口服抗凝剂或华法林抗凝的使用、耐受性和安全性。方法:本回顾性队列研究包括32例在直接口服抗凝剂(9)或华法林(23)时接受ECT治疗的患者,涵盖2012年12月至2018年12月在缅因州医疗中心进行的247次就诊。采用SPSS 25和Microsoft Excel 2016对数据进行描述性分析。结果:在247例ECT患者中,在这一医学复杂的人群中,ECT的主要不良反应很少。这些不良反应包括4次就诊时头痛(1.6%)、2次就诊时呼吸窘迫(0.8%)和1次就诊时心血管事件(0.4%)。1例(3.1%)同时接受利伐沙班和文拉法辛治疗的患者出现与电痉挛疗法无关的胃肠道出血。一名服用氟西汀和华法林的患者出现咯血,被认为是继发于鼻出血。在电痉挛治疗期间和住院期间均未发生其他大出血或凝血事件。讨论:直接口服抗凝剂和华法林对于同时接受ECT治疗的房颤或急性静脉血栓栓塞患者是安全的。需要前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring real-world symptom impact and improvement in well-being domains for tardive dyskinesia in VMAT2 inhibitor-treated patients via clinician survey and chart review Impact of Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists on improving urinary tract infection antibiotic appropriateness at an acute psychiatric hospital Barriers to access to psychiatric medications in Missouri county jails Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports Intranasal ketamine as a treatment for psychiatric complications of long COVID: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1