Headache Attributed to Temporomandibular Disorders: Axis I and II Findings According to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.11607/ofph.2863
Shoshana Reiter, Alona Emodi-Perlman, Hanita Kasiel, Waseem Abboud, Pessia Friedman-Rubin, Orit Winocur Arias, Yifat Manor
{"title":"Headache Attributed to Temporomandibular Disorders: Axis I and II Findings According to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.","authors":"Shoshana Reiter,&nbsp;Alona Emodi-Perlman,&nbsp;Hanita Kasiel,&nbsp;Waseem Abboud,&nbsp;Pessia Friedman-Rubin,&nbsp;Orit Winocur Arias,&nbsp;Yifat Manor","doi":"10.11607/ofph.2863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To analyze Axis I and II findings of patients diagnosed as having painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD) with headache attributed to TMD (HAattrTMD) in order to assess whether HAattrTMD is associated with a specific Axis I and II profile suggestive of the central sensitization process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 220 patients with painful TMD divided into those with (n = 60) and those without (n = 160) HAattrTMD, and the patients were compared for Axis I and II results according to the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27.3% of the patients received a diagnosis of HAattrTMD. Myofascial pain with referral was significantly more common in the HAattrTMD group (P < .001), while local myalgia was significantly more common in the non-HAattrTMD group (P < .001). Characteristic pain intensity was significantly higher in the HAattrTMD group (P = .003), which also showed significantly higher levels of depression (P = .002), nonspecific physical symptoms (P = .004), graded chronic pain (P = .008), and pain catastrophizing (P = .013). Nonspecific physical symptoms were positively associated with HAattrTMD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.098, 95% CI = 1.006 to 1.200, P = .037). Local myalgia was negatively associated with HAattrTMD (OR = .295, 95% CI = 0.098 to 0.887, P = .030).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Painful TMD patients who report headache in the temple area and are diagnosed as having local myalgia rather than myofascial pain with referral probably do not have HAattrTMD. The diagnosis of HAattrTMD may point to a central sensitization process and possible current/future chronic TMD conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","volume":"35 2","pages":"119-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.2863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aims: To analyze Axis I and II findings of patients diagnosed as having painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD) with headache attributed to TMD (HAattrTMD) in order to assess whether HAattrTMD is associated with a specific Axis I and II profile suggestive of the central sensitization process.

Methods: This retrospective study included 220 patients with painful TMD divided into those with (n = 60) and those without (n = 160) HAattrTMD, and the patients were compared for Axis I and II results according to the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 27.3% of the patients received a diagnosis of HAattrTMD. Myofascial pain with referral was significantly more common in the HAattrTMD group (P < .001), while local myalgia was significantly more common in the non-HAattrTMD group (P < .001). Characteristic pain intensity was significantly higher in the HAattrTMD group (P = .003), which also showed significantly higher levels of depression (P = .002), nonspecific physical symptoms (P = .004), graded chronic pain (P = .008), and pain catastrophizing (P = .013). Nonspecific physical symptoms were positively associated with HAattrTMD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.098, 95% CI = 1.006 to 1.200, P = .037). Local myalgia was negatively associated with HAattrTMD (OR = .295, 95% CI = 0.098 to 0.887, P = .030).

Conclusions: Painful TMD patients who report headache in the temple area and are diagnosed as having local myalgia rather than myofascial pain with referral probably do not have HAattrTMD. The diagnosis of HAattrTMD may point to a central sensitization process and possible current/future chronic TMD conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颞下颌疾病引起的头痛:轴I和轴II根据颞下颌疾病诊断标准的发现。
目的:分析诊断为疼痛性颞下颌紊乱(TMD)并头痛(HAattrTMD)患者的I轴和II轴结果,以评估HAattrTMD是否与提示中枢致敏过程的特定I轴和II轴相关。方法:回顾性研究220例疼痛性TMD患者,分为HAattrTMD患者(n = 60)和非HAattrTMD患者(n = 160),根据TMD诊断标准(DC/TMD)对患者进行轴I和轴II结果的比较。P值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:共有27.3%的患者被诊断为HAattrTMD。肌筋膜疼痛在HAattrTMD组中更为常见(P < 0.001),而局部肌痛在非HAattrTMD组中更为常见(P < 0.001)。HAattrTMD组的特征性疼痛强度显著高于对照组(P = 0.003),抑郁(P = 0.002)、非特异性身体症状(P = 0.004)、慢性疼痛分级(P = 0.008)和疼痛灾难化(P = 0.013)的水平也显著高于对照组(P = 0.003)。非特异性躯体症状与HAattrTMD呈正相关(优势比[OR] = 1.098, 95% CI = 1.006 ~ 1.200, P = 0.037)。局部肌痛与HAattrTMD呈负相关(OR = 0.295, 95% CI = 0.098 ~ 0.887, P = 0.030)。结论:报告太阳穴区头痛的疼痛性TMD患者,在转诊时被诊断为局部肌痛而不是肌筋膜疼痛,可能没有HAattrTMD。HAattrTMD的诊断可能指向中枢致敏过程和可能的当前/未来慢性TMD状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Founded upon sound scientific principles, this journal continues to make important contributions that strongly influence the work of dental and medical professionals involved in treating oral and facial pain, including temporomandibular disorders, and headache. In addition to providing timely scientific research and clinical articles, the journal presents diagnostic techniques and treatment therapies for oral and facial pain, headache, mandibular dysfunction, and occlusion and covers pharmacology, physical therapy, surgery, and other pain-management methods.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the occurrence of hypertension in patients receiving calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for episodic and chronic migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Associations between sleep bruxism and primary headaches: a descriptive study. Axis I diagnosis profile according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD): comparison between hospital-based orofacial pain clinic and dental academic-based orofacial pain clinic. Comparison of the effectiveness of botulinum toxin, dry needling, pharmacological treatment, and manual therapy for bruxism-induced myalgia: a prospective randomized study. Exploring the efficacy of acupuncture for tension-type headache: a literature review and insights from traditional Chinese medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1