Evaluation of 2 Ultraviolet-C Light Boxes for Decontamination of N95 Respirators.

Q1 Medicine Pathogens and Immunity Pub Date : 2021-06-05 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.20411/pai.v6i1.432
Jennifer L Cadnum, Basya S Pearlmutter, Daniel F Li, Annette L Jencson, Jacob G Scott, Ian C Charnas, Curtis J Donskey
{"title":"Evaluation of 2 Ultraviolet-C Light Boxes for Decontamination of N95 Respirators.","authors":"Jennifer L Cadnum,&nbsp;Basya S Pearlmutter,&nbsp;Daniel F Li,&nbsp;Annette L Jencson,&nbsp;Jacob G Scott,&nbsp;Ian C Charnas,&nbsp;Curtis J Donskey","doi":"10.20411/pai.v6i1.432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light devices are effective in reducing contamination on N95 filtering facepiece respirators. However, limited information is available on whether UV-C devices meet the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) microbiological requirements for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for respirator bioburden reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested the ability of 2 UV-C light boxes to achieve the 3-log<sub>10</sub> microorganism reductions required for EUA for reuse by single users. Whole 3M 1860 or Moldex 1513 respirators were inoculated on the exterior facepiece, interior facepiece, and internal fibers with bacteriophage MS2 and/or 4 strains of bacteria and treated with UV-C cycles of 1 or 20 minutes. Colorimetric indicators were used to assess penetration of UV-C through the respirators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 1 UV-C box, a 20-minute treatment achieved the required bioburden reduction for Moldex 1513 but not 3M 1860 respirators. For the second UV-C box, a 1-minute treatment achieved the required bioburden reduction in 4 bacterial strains for the Moldex 1513 respirator. Colorimetric indicators demonstrated penetration of UV-C through all layers of the Moldex 1513 respirator but not the 3M 1860 respirator.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that UV-C box technologies can achieve bioburden reductions required by the FDA for EUA for single users but highlight the potential for variable efficacy for different types of respirators.</p>","PeriodicalId":36419,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens and Immunity","volume":"6 1","pages":"104-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201793/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20411/pai.v6i1.432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light devices are effective in reducing contamination on N95 filtering facepiece respirators. However, limited information is available on whether UV-C devices meet the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) microbiological requirements for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for respirator bioburden reduction.

Methods: We tested the ability of 2 UV-C light boxes to achieve the 3-log10 microorganism reductions required for EUA for reuse by single users. Whole 3M 1860 or Moldex 1513 respirators were inoculated on the exterior facepiece, interior facepiece, and internal fibers with bacteriophage MS2 and/or 4 strains of bacteria and treated with UV-C cycles of 1 or 20 minutes. Colorimetric indicators were used to assess penetration of UV-C through the respirators.

Results: For 1 UV-C box, a 20-minute treatment achieved the required bioburden reduction for Moldex 1513 but not 3M 1860 respirators. For the second UV-C box, a 1-minute treatment achieved the required bioburden reduction in 4 bacterial strains for the Moldex 1513 respirator. Colorimetric indicators demonstrated penetration of UV-C through all layers of the Moldex 1513 respirator but not the 3M 1860 respirator.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that UV-C box technologies can achieve bioburden reductions required by the FDA for EUA for single users but highlight the potential for variable efficacy for different types of respirators.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种紫外线- c灯箱对N95口罩去污效果的评价
背景:紫外线- c (UV-C)光装置是减少N95过滤式口罩污染的有效手段。然而,关于UV-C设备是否符合美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)紧急使用授权(EUA)对呼吸器生物负荷减少的微生物要求的信息有限。方法:我们测试了2个UV-C灯箱的能力,以达到EUA所需的3-log10的微生物减少量,以供单个用户重复使用。用噬菌体MS2和/或4株细菌接种整个3M 1860或Moldex 1513口罩于面罩的外部、内部和内部纤维上,用UV-C循环处理1或20分钟。比色指标用于评估紫外线- c穿透呼吸器的能力。结果:对于1个UV-C盒,20分钟的处理达到了Moldex 1513口罩所需的生物负荷降低,但3M 1860口罩没有达到要求。对于第二个UV-C盒,1分钟的处理达到了Moldex 1513呼吸器所需的4种细菌菌株的生物负荷降低。比色指标表明,UV-C可以穿透Moldex 1513口罩的所有层,但3M 1860口罩却不能。结论:我们的研究结果表明,UV-C盒技术可以达到FDA对单个用户EUA的生物负荷降低要求,但突出了不同类型呼吸器的不同功效的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens and Immunity
Pathogens and Immunity Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Historical Highlight: The Luria-Delbrück Fluctuation Test - A Study of the Nature of Bacterial Mutations Conferring Resistance to Infection by Bacteriophage. Escape of SARS-CoV-2 Variants KP.1.1, LB.1, and KP3.3 From Approved Monoclonal Antibodies. Jonathan Yewdell Discusses Viral Immunology, Vaccine Development, Navigating a Scientific Career, and Offers Perspectives on Transforming Scientific Publishing and Research Education. Effect of Ceftaroline, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam on Establishment of Colonization by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Mice. People Living With HIV Have More Intact HIV DNA in Circulating CD4+ T Cells if They Have History of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1