Diaphyseal Proximal Phalangeal Shortening Osteotomy for Correction of Hammertoe Deformity: Operative Technique and Radiological Outcomes.

Foot & ankle specialist Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-18 DOI:10.1177/19386400211012800
Gonzalo F Bastías, Katherine Sage, Jakrapong Orapin, Lew Schon
{"title":"Diaphyseal Proximal Phalangeal Shortening Osteotomy for Correction of Hammertoe Deformity: Operative Technique and Radiological Outcomes.","authors":"Gonzalo F Bastías, Katherine Sage, Jakrapong Orapin, Lew Schon","doi":"10.1177/19386400211012800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Correction of hammertoe deformities at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint results in an inherent loss of motion that can be a concern for active patients who want to maintain toe function and grip strength. Diaphyseal proximal phalangeal shortening osteotomy (DPPSO) is a joint-sparing procedure resecting a cylindrical portion of the proximal phalanx on the middiaphysis.</p><p><strong>Patients/methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review including patients treated using DPPSO with at least a 1-year follow-up. Demographic, comorbidity, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and complication data were obtained. Radiological assessment included union status and alignment. Medial frontal anatomical (mFAA), frontal proximal interphalangeal (mFIA), plantar lateral anatomical (pLAA), and medial and plantar lateral interphalangeal angles (pLIA) were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 patients (45 toes) were included, with a mean age of 59 years (range: 24-72) and follow-up of 35 months (range: 12-60; mean preoperative VAS score was 4.9 ± 1.72 improving to 1.62 ± 2.28; <i>P</i> < .01). Union occurred in all patients at an average of 11.2 weeks. Complications were present on 4 toes (8.8%), with no recurrences. The pLIA significantly changed from 44.9° to 17.9°. There were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative values of the mFAA, pLAA, and mFIA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DPPSO provides adequate pain relief and corrects the PIP joint in the lateral plane without significantly affecting the coronal plane or the anatomical axis of the phalanx in the frontal and lateral views, nor producing secondary deformities. DPPSO is a safe, effective, and reproducible technique with a low complication rate.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong><i>Level IV: Retrospective case series</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400211012800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Correction of hammertoe deformities at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint results in an inherent loss of motion that can be a concern for active patients who want to maintain toe function and grip strength. Diaphyseal proximal phalangeal shortening osteotomy (DPPSO) is a joint-sparing procedure resecting a cylindrical portion of the proximal phalanx on the middiaphysis.

Patients/methods: This was a retrospective review including patients treated using DPPSO with at least a 1-year follow-up. Demographic, comorbidity, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and complication data were obtained. Radiological assessment included union status and alignment. Medial frontal anatomical (mFAA), frontal proximal interphalangeal (mFIA), plantar lateral anatomical (pLAA), and medial and plantar lateral interphalangeal angles (pLIA) were measured.

Results: A total of 31 patients (45 toes) were included, with a mean age of 59 years (range: 24-72) and follow-up of 35 months (range: 12-60; mean preoperative VAS score was 4.9 ± 1.72 improving to 1.62 ± 2.28; P < .01). Union occurred in all patients at an average of 11.2 weeks. Complications were present on 4 toes (8.8%), with no recurrences. The pLIA significantly changed from 44.9° to 17.9°. There were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative values of the mFAA, pLAA, and mFIA.

Conclusions: DPPSO provides adequate pain relief and corrects the PIP joint in the lateral plane without significantly affecting the coronal plane or the anatomical axis of the phalanx in the frontal and lateral views, nor producing secondary deformities. DPPSO is a safe, effective, and reproducible technique with a low complication rate.

Levels of evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于矫正锤状趾畸形的骨骺近端指骨缩短截骨术:手术技术与放射学结果
背景:矫正近端指间关节(PIP)的锤状趾畸形会导致固有的活动损失,这可能是希望保持脚趾功能和握力的活跃患者所担心的问题。骨骺近端指骨缩短截骨术(DPPSO)是一种保留关节的手术,在骨骺中部切除近端指骨的圆柱形部分:这是一项回顾性研究,包括使用DPPSO进行治疗且随访至少1年的患者。获得了人口统计学、合并症、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和并发症数据。放射学评估包括结合状态和排列。测量了内侧额部解剖角度(mFAA)、额部近端指间角度(mFIA)、足底外侧解剖角度(pLAA)以及内侧和足底外侧指间角度(pLIA):共纳入 31 名患者(45 个脚趾),平均年龄为 59 岁(24-72 岁不等),随访时间为 35 个月(12-60 个月不等;术前平均 VV 值为 0.5:平均术前 VAS 评分从 4.9 ± 1.72 改善为 1.62 ± 2.28;P <.01)。所有患者平均在 11.2 周后发生接合。有 4 个脚趾(8.8%)出现并发症,但没有复发。pLIA 从 44.9° 显著降至 17.9°。术前和术后的 mFAA、pLAA 和 mFIA 值无明显差异:DPPSO能充分缓解疼痛,并在侧面矫正PIP关节,同时不会明显影响冠状面或指骨在正面和侧面视图中的解剖轴线,也不会产生继发性畸形。DPPSO是一种安全、有效、可重复的技术,并发症发生率低:IV级:回顾性病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Timing of Fracture Fixation in Ankle Fracture-Dislocations. Effects of Parallax and Distortion in Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Effects of Pilates Exercise Training on Static Balance and Lower Limbs Proprioception in Adult Females With and Without Flexible Flatfeet. Traumatic Periprosthetic Fractures Following Total Ankle Replacement A Systematic Review and Proposed Classification. Exploring Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Failures A Comparison Between Failed and Successful Revision Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1