Reducing waiting lists for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An intensive approach to aid COVID-19 recovery.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-14 DOI:10.1007/s10353-021-00722-y
Rachael Elizabeth Clifford, Kunal Rajput, Chyu Yan Naing, Karen MacDonald, Thomas Pantak, Anil Kaul
{"title":"Reducing waiting lists for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An intensive approach to aid COVID-19 recovery.","authors":"Rachael Elizabeth Clifford,&nbsp;Kunal Rajput,&nbsp;Chyu Yan Naing,&nbsp;Karen MacDonald,&nbsp;Thomas Pantak,&nbsp;Anil Kaul","doi":"10.1007/s10353-021-00722-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations in the United Kingdom, commonly due to symptomatic gallstones. Delay between diagnosis and definitive surgical intervention often leads to a significant readmission rate, growing financial burden and increased complexity of the ultimate surgical intervention. Resource reallocation and reduced operational capacity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to an impending waiting list crisis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an attempt to address the backlog of cases, five intensive dedicated operating lists were allocated for laparoscopic cholecystectomies across a weekend in October 2020 at a single Trust. Prospective data were collected to include baseline demographics, operative procedure, 30-day post-operative outcomes and financial implications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 cholecystectomies were performed in total, with a majority ASA 2 (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) for predominantly biliary colic indication. All were completed laparoscopically, with a 90.5% rate for complete resection. There were no reported on-table complications and 81.0% of patients discharged as a day case. Thirty day follow-up revealed a complication rate of 9.5%, with 2 patients requiring oral antibiotics for a superficial wound infection. The 30 day COVID-19 rate was 14.3%. Compared to completion on an average weekday list, the total weekend was estimated to have saved over £70,000 in overall costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that weekend focused operating, with a caveat of careful patient selection and high-quality multidisciplinary working, can be a feasible solution to long waiting lists due to COVID-19 pandemic. It was safe, with avoidance of increased burden on emergency resources, and significantly increased theatre efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":50475,"journal":{"name":"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10353-021-00722-y","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-021-00722-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations in the United Kingdom, commonly due to symptomatic gallstones. Delay between diagnosis and definitive surgical intervention often leads to a significant readmission rate, growing financial burden and increased complexity of the ultimate surgical intervention. Resource reallocation and reduced operational capacity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to an impending waiting list crisis.

Methods: In an attempt to address the backlog of cases, five intensive dedicated operating lists were allocated for laparoscopic cholecystectomies across a weekend in October 2020 at a single Trust. Prospective data were collected to include baseline demographics, operative procedure, 30-day post-operative outcomes and financial implications.

Results: A total of 21 cholecystectomies were performed in total, with a majority ASA 2 (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) for predominantly biliary colic indication. All were completed laparoscopically, with a 90.5% rate for complete resection. There were no reported on-table complications and 81.0% of patients discharged as a day case. Thirty day follow-up revealed a complication rate of 9.5%, with 2 patients requiring oral antibiotics for a superficial wound infection. The 30 day COVID-19 rate was 14.3%. Compared to completion on an average weekday list, the total weekend was estimated to have saved over £70,000 in overall costs.

Conclusion: Our study showed that weekend focused operating, with a caveat of careful patient selection and high-quality multidisciplinary working, can be a feasible solution to long waiting lists due to COVID-19 pandemic. It was safe, with avoidance of increased burden on emergency resources, and significantly increased theatre efficiency.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术的等待名单:帮助COVID-19康复的强化方法。
背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是英国最常见的手术之一,通常是由于症状性胆结石。诊断和最终手术干预之间的延迟通常导致显著的再入院率,经济负担增加和最终手术干预的复杂性增加。2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的资源重新分配和业务能力下降导致即将到来的等候名单危机。方法:为了解决积压的病例,在2020年10月的一个周末 在一个信托机构分配了五个密集的专用手术清单,用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术。前瞻性数据收集包括基线人口统计学、手术程序、术后30天结果和财务影响。结果:共行胆囊切除术21例,多数以胆绞痛指征为主。所有手术均在腹腔镜下完成,完全切除率为90.5%。无表上并发症报告,81.0%的患者出院为一日病例。30天随访发现并发症发生率为9.5%,2例患者因浅表伤口感染需要口服抗生素。30天的新冠肺炎发病率为14.3%。与平日完成的平均清单相比,整个周末估计节省了超过7万英镑的总成本。结论:我们的研究表明,在谨慎选择患者和高质量多学科工作的前提下,周末集中手术是解决COVID-19大流行导致的长时间等待名单的可行方案。它是安全的,避免了增加对应急资源的负担,并大大提高了手术室的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal European Surgery – Acta Chirurgica Austriaca focuses on general surgery, endocrine surgery, thoracic surgery, heart and vascular surgery. Special features include new surgical and endoscopic techniques such as minimally invasive surgery, robot surgery, and advances in surgery-related biotechnology and surgical oncology. The journal especially addresses benign and malignant esophageal diseases, i.e. achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett’s esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. In keeping with modern healthcare requirements, the journal’s scope includes inter- and multidisciplinary disease management (diagnosis, therapy and surveillance).
期刊最新文献
Remote training and evaluation of a simulator-based training course for complex endovascular procedures. Training in vascular trauma surgery for non-vascular surgeons: Vascular trauma surgery skills course. Coping with a lack of evidence: living-donor kidney transplantation in the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. 63rd Annual Meeting of the Austrian Society of Surgery. Delayed presentation of inflammatory breast carcinoma during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1