A systematic review of temporomandibular disorder diagnostic methods.

IF 2 4区医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Cranio-The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-29 DOI:10.1080/08869634.2021.1956224

Ada M González-González, Azael J Herrero

{"title":"A systematic review of temporomandibular disorder diagnostic methods.","authors":"Ada M González-González, Azael J Herrero","doi":"10.1080/08869634.2021.1956224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compile the screening tools used to study temporomandibular disorders (TMD), classify and analyze their potential application in the field of physiotherapy.Methods: All gathered data included randomized clinical trials on humans over 18 years of age pulled from three databases up to November 2019.Results: Nineteen articles were retained, in which the subjects included 1095 women and 385 men. The 32 valuation systems reported were classified as follows: direct, requiring observation and/or palpation in situ by a clinician, which can be subdivided into protocols and instrumental systems; and indirect, requiring neither observation nor palpation by a clinician, which can be subdivided into questionnaires and scales.Conclusion: In order to evaluate TMD, the best choice is to combine direct and indirect assessment methodologies. The valuation of pressure pain threshold with an algometer and Fonseca's Anamnestic Index in combination with Anamnestic Questionnaire CMD, respectively, seems to provide the best results.","PeriodicalId":56318,"journal":{"name":"Cranio-The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cranio-The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2021.1956224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compile the screening tools used to study temporomandibular disorders (TMD), classify and analyze their potential application in the field of physiotherapy.Methods: All gathered data included randomized clinical trials on humans over 18 years of age pulled from three databases up to November 2019.Results: Nineteen articles were retained, in which the subjects included 1095 women and 385 men. The 32 valuation systems reported were classified as follows: direct, requiring observation and/or palpation in situ by a clinician, which can be subdivided into protocols and instrumental systems; and indirect, requiring neither observation nor palpation by a clinician, which can be subdivided into questionnaires and scales.Conclusion: In order to evaluate TMD, the best choice is to combine direct and indirect assessment methodologies. The valuation of pressure pain threshold with an algometer and Fonseca's Anamnestic Index in combination with Anamnestic Questionnaire CMD, respectively, seems to provide the best results.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

颞下颌关节紊乱症诊断方法的系统回顾。

目的汇编用于研究颞下颌关节紊乱症（TMD）的筛查工具，对其进行分类并分析其在物理治疗领域的潜在应用：所有收集的数据包括截至 2019 年 11 月从三个数据库中提取的针对 18 岁以上人群的随机临床试验：保留了19篇文章，其中受试者包括1095名女性和385名男性。所报告的32种评估系统分为以下几类：直接评估系统，需要临床医生进行现场观察和/或触诊，又可细分为方案评估系统和仪器评估系统；间接评估系统，既不需要临床医生进行观察，也不需要触诊，又可细分为问卷评估系统和量表评估系统：结论：为了评估 TMD，最佳选择是将直接和间接评估方法结合起来。结论：为了评估 TMD，最好的选择是将直接评估和间接评估方法结合起来。分别使用算法和 Fonseca 的 Anamnestic 指数以及 Anamnestic Questionnaire CMD 来评估压痛阈值似乎效果最好。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Cranio-The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： CRANIO: The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice is the oldest and largest journal in the world devoted to temporomandibular disorders, and now also includes articles on all aspects of sleep medicine. The Journal is multidisciplinary in its scope, with editorial board members from all areas of medicine and dentistry, including general dentists, oral surgeons, orthopaedists, radiologists, chiropractors, professors and behavioural scientists, physical therapists, acupuncturists, osteopathic and ear, nose and throat physicians. CRANIO publishes commendable works from outstanding researchers and clinicians in their respective fields. The multidisciplinary format allows individuals practicing with a TMD emphasis to stay abreast of related disciplines, as each issue presents multiple topics from overlapping areas of interest. CRANIO''s current readership (thousands) is comprised primarily of dentists; however, many physicians, physical therapists, chiropractors, osteopathic physicians and other related specialists subscribe and contribute to the Journal.