Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature.

IF 2.6 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Application of Clinical Genetics Pub Date : 2021-07-23 DOI:10.2147/TACG.S320778
Ralph S Papas, William H Kutteh
{"title":"Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature.","authors":"Ralph S Papas,&nbsp;William H Kutteh","doi":"10.2147/TACG.S320778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is an obstetrical complication that affects about 3% of reproductive age couples. Genetic and non-genetic causes of RPL are multiple; however, aneuploidy is the most common obstetrical complication that can explain single and recurrent pregnancy loss (present in about 60% of recognized clinical pregnancies which result in a miscarriage). Parental karyotyping will only be of potential benefit for 2 to 5 percentage of RPL couples who are translocation carriers. Products of conception (POC) karyotype analysis has been used to direct management in RPL and has been shown to be cost-effective, but the technique has many limitations including high culture failure rate and maternal cell contamination. These limitations can be significantly reduced using POC chromosomal microarray (CMA) technology. We believe that POC genetic testing should be performed after the second and subsequent pregnancy loss using CMA. Although the results will not generally alter the course of treatment, the knowledge of the reason for the loss is of great emotional comfort to many patients. In addition, POC CMA performed in conjunction with a regular complete maternal RPL work-up will identify the group of truly unexplained RPL. Thus, only 10% of patients with RPL will complete an evaluation having a euploid loss and an otherwise normal work-up. This group of \"truly unexplained RPL\" would be ideal for new research trials and therapies. Pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) technology has improved recently with day 5 trophectoderm biopsy as compared to biopsy on day 3 as well as with the addition of CMA and next-generation sequencing technologies. The most recent studies on PGT-SR (PGT-Structural rearrangement) show improved clinical and live birth rates per pregnancy, as well as decreased miscarriage rate for translocation carriers. PGT-A (PGT-aneuploidy) may have a limited role in RPL in cases with documented recurrent POC aneuploidy.</p>","PeriodicalId":39131,"journal":{"name":"Application of Clinical Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ac/18/tacg-14-321.PMC8315809.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Application of Clinical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S320778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is an obstetrical complication that affects about 3% of reproductive age couples. Genetic and non-genetic causes of RPL are multiple; however, aneuploidy is the most common obstetrical complication that can explain single and recurrent pregnancy loss (present in about 60% of recognized clinical pregnancies which result in a miscarriage). Parental karyotyping will only be of potential benefit for 2 to 5 percentage of RPL couples who are translocation carriers. Products of conception (POC) karyotype analysis has been used to direct management in RPL and has been shown to be cost-effective, but the technique has many limitations including high culture failure rate and maternal cell contamination. These limitations can be significantly reduced using POC chromosomal microarray (CMA) technology. We believe that POC genetic testing should be performed after the second and subsequent pregnancy loss using CMA. Although the results will not generally alter the course of treatment, the knowledge of the reason for the loss is of great emotional comfort to many patients. In addition, POC CMA performed in conjunction with a regular complete maternal RPL work-up will identify the group of truly unexplained RPL. Thus, only 10% of patients with RPL will complete an evaluation having a euploid loss and an otherwise normal work-up. This group of "truly unexplained RPL" would be ideal for new research trials and therapies. Pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) technology has improved recently with day 5 trophectoderm biopsy as compared to biopsy on day 3 as well as with the addition of CMA and next-generation sequencing technologies. The most recent studies on PGT-SR (PGT-Structural rearrangement) show improved clinical and live birth rates per pregnancy, as well as decreased miscarriage rate for translocation carriers. PGT-A (PGT-aneuploidy) may have a limited role in RPL in cases with documented recurrent POC aneuploidy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重流产患者非整倍体的基因检测:当前文献综述。
复发性妊娠损失(RPL)是一种产科并发症,影响约3%的育龄夫妇。RPL的遗传和非遗传原因是多方面的;然而,非整倍体是最常见的产科并发症,可以解释单次和复发性流产(约60%的公认临床妊娠会导致流产)。父母核型分析只会对2%到5%的易位携带者RPL夫妇有潜在的益处。妊娠产物(POC)核型分析已被用于指导RPL的管理,并已被证明具有成本效益,但该技术有许多局限性,包括高培养失败率和母体细胞污染。使用POC染色体微阵列(CMA)技术可以显著减少这些限制。我们认为,应在第二次及随后的妊娠失败后使用CMA进行POC基因检测。尽管结果通常不会改变治疗过程,但了解损失原因对许多患者来说是一种极大的情感安慰。此外,POC CMA结合定期的完整母体RPL检查将确定真正无法解释的RPL组。因此,只有10%的RPL患者会完成整倍体缺失和其他正常检查的评估。这组“真正无法解释的RPL”将是新的研究试验和治疗的理想选择。植入前基因检测(PGT)技术最近有所改进,与第3天的活检相比,第5天的滋养细胞外胚层活检以及CMA和下一代测序技术的加入。最近关于PGT-SR(PGT结构重排)的研究表明,每次妊娠的临床和活产率都有所提高,易位携带者的流产率也有所降低。PGT-A(PGT非整倍体)在复发性POC非整倍性病例的RPL中的作用可能有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Application of Clinical Genetics
Application of Clinical Genetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Ser434Phe Androgen Receptor Gene Mutation Does Not Affect Fertility but is Associated with Increased Prolactin. Class II Transactivator Gene (CIITA) Variants Associated with Bare Lymphocyte Syndrome II in a Female Sudanese Patient. Erratum: Sturge-Weber Syndrome: A Review of Pathophysiology, Genetics, Clinical Features, and Current Management Approache [Corrigendum]. Comparison of the Accuracy in Provisional Diagnosis of 22q11.2 Deletion and Williams Syndromes by Facial Photos in Thai Population Between De-Identified Facial Program and Clinicians. The Diversity of CYP2C19 Polymorphisms in the Thai Population: Implications for Precision Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1