Cheol Ho Lee, Ji Hun Ahn, Joon Ha Ryu, Woong Gil Choi
{"title":"Clinical Impact of after-consult clinic blood pressure: comparison with automated office blood pressure.","authors":"Cheol Ho Lee, Ji Hun Ahn, Joon Ha Ryu, Woong Gil Choi","doi":"10.1186/s40885-021-00171-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is most important to measure blood pressure (BP) exactly in treating hypertension. Recent recommendations for diagnosing hypertension clearly acknowledge that an increase in BP attributable to the \"whitecoat response\" is frequently associated with manual BP recordings performed in community-based practice. However, there was no data about after-consult (AC) BP that could reduce whitecoat effect. So we evaluated before-consult (BC) and AC routine clinic BP and research based automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population consisted of 82 consecutive patients with hypertension between April 2019 and December 2019. We measured routine clinic BP and AOBP before and after see a doctor, respectively. Seated blood pressure and pulse are measured at each time after a rest period using an automated device as it offers reduced potential for observer biases. AOBP was measured and measuring BP 3 times un-observed. We compared each BP parameter for identifying exact resting BP state.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significant difference between BC and AC systolic BP (135.37 ± 16.90 vs. 131.95 ± 16.40 mmHg, p = 0.015). However there was no difference in the BC and AC diastolic blood pressure (73.75 ± 11.85 vs. 74.42 ± 11.71 mmHg, p = 0.415). In the AOBP comparison, there was also significant difference (BC systolic AOBP vs. AC systolic AOBP, 125.17 ± 14.41 vs. 122.98 ± 14.09 mmHg, p = 0.006; BC diastolic ABOB vs. AC diastolic AOBP, 71.99 ± 10.49 vs. 70.99 ± 9.83, p = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, AC AOBP was most lowest representing resting state. Although AC BP was higher than BC AOBP, it might be used as alternative measurement for reducing whitecoat effect in the routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10480,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40885-021-00171-5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-021-00171-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: It is most important to measure blood pressure (BP) exactly in treating hypertension. Recent recommendations for diagnosing hypertension clearly acknowledge that an increase in BP attributable to the "whitecoat response" is frequently associated with manual BP recordings performed in community-based practice. However, there was no data about after-consult (AC) BP that could reduce whitecoat effect. So we evaluated before-consult (BC) and AC routine clinic BP and research based automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measured.
Methods: The study population consisted of 82 consecutive patients with hypertension between April 2019 and December 2019. We measured routine clinic BP and AOBP before and after see a doctor, respectively. Seated blood pressure and pulse are measured at each time after a rest period using an automated device as it offers reduced potential for observer biases. AOBP was measured and measuring BP 3 times un-observed. We compared each BP parameter for identifying exact resting BP state.
Results: There was significant difference between BC and AC systolic BP (135.37 ± 16.90 vs. 131.95 ± 16.40 mmHg, p = 0.015). However there was no difference in the BC and AC diastolic blood pressure (73.75 ± 11.85 vs. 74.42 ± 11.71 mmHg, p = 0.415). In the AOBP comparison, there was also significant difference (BC systolic AOBP vs. AC systolic AOBP, 125.17 ± 14.41 vs. 122.98 ± 14.09 mmHg, p = 0.006; BC diastolic ABOB vs. AC diastolic AOBP, 71.99 ± 10.49 vs. 70.99 ± 9.83, p = 0.038).
Conclusions: In our study, AC AOBP was most lowest representing resting state. Although AC BP was higher than BC AOBP, it might be used as alternative measurement for reducing whitecoat effect in the routine clinical practice.
背景:准确测量血压在高血压治疗中至关重要。最近的高血压诊断建议明确承认,“白大褂反应”引起的血压升高通常与社区实践中进行的手动血压记录有关。然而,没有关于咨询后血压(AC)可以减少白衣效应的数据。因此,我们评估会诊前(BC)和AC常规临床血压和基于研究的自动办公室血压(AOBP)测量。方法:研究人群包括2019年4月至2019年12月期间连续82例高血压患者。分别在就诊前后测量常规临床血压和AOBP。在休息一段时间后,每次使用自动化设备测量坐姿血压和脉搏,因为它减少了观察者偏差的可能性。测量AOBP,并在未观察的情况下测量BP 3次。我们比较了每个血压参数,以确定准确的静息血压状态。结果:BC组与AC组的收缩压差异有统计学意义(135.37±16.90 vs 131.95±16.40 mmHg, p = 0.015)。然而,BC和AC舒张压无差异(73.75±11.85比74.42±11.71 mmHg, p = 0.415)。在AOBP的比较中,也有显著差异(BC组收缩期AOBP vs AC组收缩期AOBP, 125.17±14.41 vs 122.98±14.09 mmHg, p = 0.006;BC舒张ABOB vs AC舒张AOBP, 71.99±10.49 vs 70.99±9.83,p = 0.038)。结论:在我们的研究中,AC AOBP最低,代表静息状态。虽然AC血压高于BC AOBP,但在常规临床实践中可作为减少白衣效应的替代指标。