An Analysis of the Altria-Juul Labs Deal: Antitrust and Population Health Implications.

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Competition Law & Economics Pub Date : 2021-01-23 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1093/joclec/nhaa033
David T Levy, Luz María Sánchez-Romero, Clifford E Douglas, David T Sweanor
{"title":"An Analysis of the Altria-Juul Labs Deal: Antitrust and Population Health Implications.","authors":"David T Levy,&nbsp;Luz María Sánchez-Romero,&nbsp;Clifford E Douglas,&nbsp;David T Sweanor","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhaa033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On December 19, 2018, Altria announced an offer of $12.8 billion for Juul Labs, combining the largest U.S. cigarette manufacturer with the largest U.S. e-cigarette company. This deal is currently being challenged by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). We consider the antitrust implications. We also consider population health implications, which we argue are essential to a comprehensive analysis of the impact on consumers. Although the FTC antitrust investigation has focused on closed vaping systems, we argue that the relevant market is the broader nicotine delivery product market, which includes all vaping products along with tobacco products. With Altria having a large market share in the key nicotine delivery product submarkets and with important entry barriers, the merger potentially places Altria in a dominant position in the relevant market. In particular, competition in the vaping submarket is reduced, thereby likely to reduce the availability of less harmful alternatives to cigarettes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","volume":"17 2","pages":"458-492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318606/pdf/nhaa033.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaa033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

On December 19, 2018, Altria announced an offer of $12.8 billion for Juul Labs, combining the largest U.S. cigarette manufacturer with the largest U.S. e-cigarette company. This deal is currently being challenged by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). We consider the antitrust implications. We also consider population health implications, which we argue are essential to a comprehensive analysis of the impact on consumers. Although the FTC antitrust investigation has focused on closed vaping systems, we argue that the relevant market is the broader nicotine delivery product market, which includes all vaping products along with tobacco products. With Altria having a large market share in the key nicotine delivery product submarkets and with important entry barriers, the merger potentially places Altria in a dominant position in the relevant market. In particular, competition in the vaping submarket is reduced, thereby likely to reduce the availability of less harmful alternatives to cigarettes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥驰亚- juul实验室交易分析:反垄断和人口健康影响。
2018年12月19日,奥驰亚宣布以128亿美元收购美国最大的卷烟制造商Juul Labs,将其与美国最大的电子烟公司合并。这项交易目前正受到美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)的质疑。我们考虑反垄断的影响。我们还考虑了对人口健康的影响,我们认为这对于全面分析对消费者的影响至关重要。尽管联邦贸易委员会的反垄断调查主要集中在封闭的电子烟系统上,但我们认为相关的市场是更广泛的尼古丁输送产品市场,包括所有的电子烟产品和烟草产品。由于奥驰亚在关键的尼古丁输送产品子市场占有很大的市场份额,并且存在重要的进入壁垒,合并可能使奥驰亚在相关市场占据主导地位。特别是,电子烟子市场的竞争减少了,因此可能会减少危害较小的香烟替代品的供应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
26.70%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Requisite Legal Standard of the Digital Markets Act’s Designation Process Price Effects of Horizontal Mergers: A Retrospective on Retrospectives ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ABUSE OF DOMINANCE PROVISIONS MERGING LAGGARDS The Effective Use of Economics in the EU Digital Markets Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1