Examining cannabis protective behavioral strategy use using multiple methods.

IF 0.9 Q3 Psychology Drugs and Alcohol Today Pub Date : 2019-10-23 Epub Date: 2019-03-06 DOI:10.1108/dat-10-2018-0061
Mark A Prince, Tiffany Jenzer, Whitney Brown, Eleftherios M Hetelekides, Rachel A Mumm, R Lorraine Collins
{"title":"Examining cannabis protective behavioral strategy use using multiple methods.","authors":"Mark A Prince,&nbsp;Tiffany Jenzer,&nbsp;Whitney Brown,&nbsp;Eleftherios M Hetelekides,&nbsp;Rachel A Mumm,&nbsp;R Lorraine Collins","doi":"10.1108/dat-10-2018-0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose –: </strong>Cannabis use among young adults is increasing, despite being associated with several negative consequences. Protective behavioral strategies (PBSs) are a potential mechanism of behavior change for reducing substance use, yet PBS use for cannabis is not well understood. The purpose of this paper is to further define and measure the PBS construct for cannabis.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach –: </strong>A community sample of cannabis users (n = 54) participated in eight focus groups discussing the use of PBSs. Participants completed surveys regarding demographics, cannabis use habits and cannabis problems. The authors also administered an existing measure of cannabis PBS and asked them to generate new or unique protective strategies that they had used or had heard of others using.</p><p><strong>Findings –: </strong>Thematic analysis of qualitative focus group data provided information about cannabis users' reasons for regulating cannabis use (e.g. health or legal problems, interpersonal) as well as strategies to moderate cannabis use or attenuate their risk for experiencing adverse consequences (e.g. distraction, existential/spiritual strategies). Analyses of quantitative survey data revealed that use of PBSs was negatively correlated with cannabis outcomes. Perceived helpfulness of strategies was an important predictor of decreased cannabis use and adverse consequences.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications –: </strong>Findings expand the understanding of the definition and measurement of strategies for regulating cannabis use and reducing related risk of experiencing adverse consequences.</p><p><strong>Originality/value –: </strong>This is the first study to examine cannabis-related PBS using both qualitative and quantitative methods, which provide insights into the definition of PBS and for future refinements of PBS measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":44780,"journal":{"name":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/dat-10-2018-0061","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dat-10-2018-0061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose –: Cannabis use among young adults is increasing, despite being associated with several negative consequences. Protective behavioral strategies (PBSs) are a potential mechanism of behavior change for reducing substance use, yet PBS use for cannabis is not well understood. The purpose of this paper is to further define and measure the PBS construct for cannabis.

Design/methodology/approach –: A community sample of cannabis users (n = 54) participated in eight focus groups discussing the use of PBSs. Participants completed surveys regarding demographics, cannabis use habits and cannabis problems. The authors also administered an existing measure of cannabis PBS and asked them to generate new or unique protective strategies that they had used or had heard of others using.

Findings –: Thematic analysis of qualitative focus group data provided information about cannabis users' reasons for regulating cannabis use (e.g. health or legal problems, interpersonal) as well as strategies to moderate cannabis use or attenuate their risk for experiencing adverse consequences (e.g. distraction, existential/spiritual strategies). Analyses of quantitative survey data revealed that use of PBSs was negatively correlated with cannabis outcomes. Perceived helpfulness of strategies was an important predictor of decreased cannabis use and adverse consequences.

Research limitations/implications –: Findings expand the understanding of the definition and measurement of strategies for regulating cannabis use and reducing related risk of experiencing adverse consequences.

Originality/value –: This is the first study to examine cannabis-related PBS using both qualitative and quantitative methods, which provide insights into the definition of PBS and for future refinements of PBS measurement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用多种方法检查大麻保护行为策略的使用。
目的:尽管大麻与一些负面后果有关,但年轻人中使用大麻的人数正在增加。保护性行为策略(PBSs)是减少物质使用的行为改变的潜在机制,但对大麻的PBS使用尚未得到很好的理解。本文的目的是进一步定义和测量大麻的PBS结构。设计/方法/方法-:大麻使用者的社区样本(n = 54)参加了讨论公共服务方案使用情况的八个焦点小组。参与者完成了关于人口统计、大麻使用习惯和大麻问题的调查。作者还对大麻PBS进行了现有的测量,并要求他们产生新的或独特的保护策略,这些策略是他们使用过的或听说过其他人使用的。调查结果-:对定性焦点小组数据的专题分析提供了关于大麻使用者管制大麻使用的原因(例如健康或法律问题、人际关系)以及适度使用大麻或减轻其遭受不利后果风险的战略(例如分心、存在/精神战略)的信息。定量调查数据分析显示,PBSs的使用与大麻结果呈负相关。感知策略的有用性是减少大麻使用和不良后果的重要预测因子。研究局限/影响:研究结果扩大了对管制大麻使用和减少相关不良后果风险战略的定义和衡量的理解。原创性/价值:这是第一个使用定性和定量方法检查大麻相关PBS的研究,这为PBS的定义和未来PBS测量的改进提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs and Alcohol Today
Drugs and Alcohol Today SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The misuse of drugs act – a user perspective More harm than good? Cannabis, harm and the misuse of drugs act Risk perception, health stressors and reduction in sharing cannabis products during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study From law to regulation: re-appraising the misuse of Drugs Act 1971 Fifty years of the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971: the legislative contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1